Accessibility, pluralism, and honesty: a defense of the accessibility requirement in public justification

References

• Audi, R. (1997). Wolterstorff on religion, politics, and the liberal state. In R. Audi & N. Wolterstorff (Eds.), Religion in the public square: The place of religious convictions in political debate (pp. 121–144). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Audi, R. (2011). Democratic authority and the separation of church and state. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardon, A. (2018). Two misunderstandings about public justification and religious reason. Law and Philosophy, 37, 639–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingham, P. (2016). Convergence justification within political liberalism—a defence. Res Publica (liverpool, England), 22, 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, C. (2014). Coercion and public justification. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 13, 189–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1997). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., & Richardson, H. (2010). Liberalism, deliberative democracy, and “Reasons that all can accept”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 253–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonotti, M. (2017). Partisanship and political liberalism in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonotti, M., & Barnhill, A. (n.d.). Are healthy eating policies consistent with public reason? Journal of Applied Philosophy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12318
   Google Scholar
• Carey, B. (2018). Public reason—honesty, not sincerity. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 26, 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, J. (1994). The myth of ownership: Toward an egalitarian theory of ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1996). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 407–438). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle, C. (2002). Religious conviction in liberal politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. (1996). Justificatory liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. (2010). The place of religious belief in public reason liberalism. In M. S. Dimovia-Cookson & P. Stirk (Eds.), Multiculturalism and moral conflict (pp. 19–37). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. (2011). The order of public reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G., & Vallier, K. (2009). The roles of religious conviction in a publicly justified polity: the implications of convergence, asymmetry and political institutions. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35, 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thomson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde, C. (2013). Justificatory secularism. In G. D’Costa, M. Evans, T. Modood, & J. Rivers (Eds.), Religion in a liberal state: Cross-disciplinary reflections. (pp. 164–186). Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C. (2017). Religion. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. (1999). The moral basis of political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 96, 599–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. (2015). Political liberalism: Its motivation and goals. In D. Sobel, P. Vallentyre, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 63–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, A. (2011). Public reason and political community. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (2003). Utilitarianism and on liberty (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Munzer, S. R. (1990). A theory of property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B. (n.d.). Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1448046
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39, 3–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quong, J. (2011). Liberalism without perfection. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quong, J. (2014). On the idea of public reason. In J. Mandle & D. A. Reidy (Eds.), A companion to Rawls (pp. 265–280). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, M. (2011). The sincerity of public reason. Journal of Political Philosophy, 19, 375–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. (1993). On the edge of anarchy: Locke, consent, and the limits of society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stilz, A. (2015). The value of self-determination. In D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 98–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. (2004). Public reason and precluded reasons. Fordham Law Review, 72, 2073–2088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrasher, J. (2016). The ethics of legislative vote trading. Political Studies, 64, 614–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (2014). Liberal politics and public faith. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (2016). In defense of the asymmetric convergence model of public justification—A reply to Boettcher. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19, 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (2017). On Jonathan Quong’s sectarian political liberalism. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 11, 175–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (2018). Public Justification. In E. N. Zalta Ed., The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justification-public/
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (n.d.). The duties of political officials in a minimally secular state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/japp.12349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1988). The right to private property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weithman, P. (1995). Contractualist liberalism and deliberative democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24, 314–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weithman, P. (2010). Why political liberalism? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. (2019). Conjecture and the division of justificatory labour: A comment on Clayton and Stevens. Res Publica (liverpool, England), 25, 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. (n.d.). Public reason and structural coercion: In defense of the coercion account as the ground of public reason. Social Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar