Violence and the materiality of power

References

• Allen, A. (1999). The power of feminist theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A. (2002). Power, subjectivity, and agency: Between Arendt and Foucault. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 10(2), 131–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition (2nd. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanonich.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1990). On revolution. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyash, M. M. (2013). The paradox of political violence. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(3), 342–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernasconi, R. (1996). The double face of the political and the social: Hannah Arendt and America’s racial divisions. Research in Phenomenology, 26, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (2012). Hannah Arendt’s reflections on violence and power. IRIS, 3(5), 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2009). Reason in philosophy: Animating ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, K. (2007). Violence and power: A critique of Hannah Arendt on the `political’. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33(3), 343–372.
   Google Scholar
• Bufacchi, V. (2005). Two concepts of violence. Political Studies Review, 3(2), 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1992). Hannah arendt: a reinterpretation of her political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511521300
   Google Scholar
• Capers, I. B. (2009). Policing, race, and place. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 44(1), 43–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, M. (2017). State racism, state violence, and vulnerable solidarity. In N. Zack (Ed.), The oxford handbook of philosophy and race (pp. 352–362). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, S. (2014). Hobbes and the question of power. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52(1), 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, C. J. (2009). Hannah Arendt’s critique of violence. Thesis Eleven, 97(1), 26–45.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2015). Noumenal power. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality Vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, E., & Hutchings, K. (2008). On politics and violence: Arendt Contra Fanon. Contemporary Political Theory, 7(1), 90–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gines, K. T. (2014). Hannah Arendt and the Negro question. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1977). Hannah Arendt’s communications concept of power. Social Research, 44(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen, B. (2000). Critique of violence: Between poststructuralism and critical theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: social construction and social critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. R. (2000). De-Facing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, A. (2017). The concept of violence in the work of Hannah Arendt. Continental Philosophy Review, 50(2), 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan (Revised student ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1991). The critique of power: reflective stages in a critical social theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, J. (2003). All power to the people! Hannah Arendt’s theory of communicative power in a racialized democracy. In R. Bernasconi & S. Cook (Eds.), Race and racism in continental philosophy (pp. 249–267). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kautzer, C. (2019). Political violence and race: A critique of Hannah Arendt. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 21(3). doi:10.7771/1481-4374.3551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, A. (1994). Promises, promises: The abyss of freedom and the loss of the political in the work of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory, 22(2), 297–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1984). On the methods of long-distance control: vessels, navigation and the portuguese route to india. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 234-63). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984. 32 doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Luban, D. (2014). Torture, power, and law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.) New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marquez, X. (2012). Spaces of appearance and spaces of surveillance. Polity, 44(1), 6–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, J. (1998). Hannah Arendt: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (2009). Rawls on race/race in Rawls. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 47(S1), 161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon democracy: political power in the age of oil. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Niedermeier, S. (2013). Violence, visibility, and the investigation of police torture in the American South, 1940–1955. In J. Martschukat & S. Niedermeier (Eds.), Violence and visibility in modern history (pp. 91–112). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Oksala, J. (2012). Foucault, politics, and violence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passerin d’Entrèves, M. (1989). freedom, plurality, solidarity: Hannah Arendt’s theory of action. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 15(4). 317–350.
   Google Scholar
• Rolnick, A. D. (2019). Defending white space: Race and self-defense. Cardozo Law Review, 40(4), 1639–1722.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter: Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S. (2015). Architectural exclusion: Discrimination and segregation through physical design of the built environment. Yale Law Journal, 124(6), 1934–2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, T. E. (1990). The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Y. (2018). Machiavelli and the orders of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108635578
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. L. (2013). The “vicarious play” of lynching melodramas: Cinema and mob violence in the United States, 1895–1905. In J. Martschukat & S. Niedermeier (Eds.), Violence and visibility in modern history (pp. 113–135). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2002). Power, violence, and legitimacy: A reading of Hannah Arendt in an age of police brutality and humanitarian intervention. In M. Minow (Ed.), Breaking the cycles of hatred: Memory, law, and repair (pp. 260–287). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar