Educational adequacy and educational equality: a merging proposal

References

• Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2007). Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics, 117(4), 595–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. J. (1989). Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56(1), 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. J. (2000). Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism. Ethics, 110(2), 339–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. J. (2015). Equality of opportunity. In E. N. Zalta Ed., The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Bou-Habib, P., & Olsaretti, S. (2015). Autonomy and children’s well-being. In A. Bagattini & C. Macleod (Eds.), The nature of children’s well-being: Theory and practice (pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. (2014). The goods of childhood, children’s rights, and the role of parents as advocates and interpreters. In F. Baylis & C. Macleod (Eds.), Family-making: Contemporary ethical challenges (pp. 29–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H. (2002). School choice and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014). The place of educational equality in educational justice. In K. Meyer (Ed.), Education, justice and the human good: Fairness and equality in the education system (pp. 14–33). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., Ladd, H. F., Loeb, S., & Swift, A. (2016). Educational goods and values: A framework for decision makers. Theory and Research in Education, 14(1), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2006). Equality, priority, and positional goods. Ethics, 116(3), 471–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2008). Putting educational equality in its place. Education Finance and Policy, 3(4), 444–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2009a). Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26(2), 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2009b). Legitimate parental partiality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(1), 43–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casal, P. (2007). Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117(2), 296–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, M. (2001). Rawls and natural aristocracy. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 1(3), 239–259.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, M. (2006). Justice and legitimacy in upbringing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, M. (2007). The limits of equal opportunity. European Political Science, 6, 412–420.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, M. (2015). How much do we owe to children? In S. Hannan, S. Brennan, & R. Vernon (Eds.), Permissible progeny? The morality of procreation and parenting (pp. 246–264). New York, NY: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, M. (2018). Education. In S. Olsaretti (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of distributive justice (pp. 438–459). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, M., & Stevens, D. (2004). School choice and the burdens of justice. Theory and Research in Education, 2(2), 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2004). Expensive taste rides again. In J. Burley (Ed.), Dworkin and his critics: With replies by Dworkin (pp. 3–29). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2003). Equality, luck and hierarchy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(2), 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2004). Ronald Dworkin replies. In J. Burley (Ed.), Dworkin and his critics: With replies by Dworkin (pp. 339–350). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Engster, D. (2019). Equal opportunity and the family: Levelling up the Brighouse-Swift thesis. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 36(1), 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1983). Justice, equal opportunity, and the family. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1987). Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics, 98(1), 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A. (2015). The intrinsic goods of childhood and the just society. In A. Bagattini & C. Macleod (Eds.), The nature of children’s well-being: Theory and practice (pp. 35–52). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. (2004). Pursuing equal opportunities: The theory and practice of egalitarian justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C. (1988). Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal? Ethics, 98(3), 518–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, K. (2018). Education, sufficiency, and the relational egalitarian ideal. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(4), 759–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, C. (2010a). Justice, educational equality, and sufficiency. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36, 151–175.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, C. (2010b). Primary goods, capabilities and children. In H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns (Eds.), Measuring justice: Primary goods and capabilities (pp. 174–192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, A. (2006). Levelling the playing field: The idea of equal opportunity and its place in egalitarian thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2004). The concept of desert. In M. Clayton & A. Williams (Eds.), Social justice (pp. 186–200). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2013). Justice for earthlings: Essays in political philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin, A. (2007). Children, autonomy, and care. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(4), 536–553.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and partiality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsaretti, S. (2004). Liberty, desert and the market: A philosophical study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsaretti, S. (2006). Justice, luck, and desert. In J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig, & A. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political theory (pp. 436–449). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. (2000). Equality and priority? In M. Clayton & A. Williams (Eds.), The ideal of equality (pp. 81–125). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1982). Social unity and primary goods. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 159–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J. (1986). The morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117(4), 623–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. (1988). The significance of choice. In S. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner lectures on human values (Vol. 8, pp. 149–216). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. (2018). Why does inequality matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S. (2003). What is egalitarianism? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(1), 5–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemmel, C. (2011). Distributive and relational equality. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11(2), 123–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, G., & Brighouse, H. (2014). Redistributing education among the less advantaged: A problem for principles of justice? Social Philosophy & Policy, 31(1), 109–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segall, S. (2013). Equality and opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sher, G. (1979). Effort, ability, and personal desert. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(4), 361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, L. (2016). Just enough: Sufficiency as a demand of justice. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, S. V. (2004). Race, labor, and the fair equality of opportunity principle. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1643–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, S. V. (2010). Incentives, motives, and talents. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(2), 111–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A., & White, S. (2008). Political theory, social science, and real politics. In D. Leopold & M. Stears (Eds.), Political theory: Methods and approaches (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2009). Justice, luck, and the family: The intergenerational transmission of economic advantage from a normative perspective. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. O. Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success (pp. 256–276). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. S. (2004). Self-realization and the priority of fair equality of opportunity. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1(3), 333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Temkin, L. (2000). Equality, priority, and the levelling-down objection. In M. Clayton & A. Williams (Eds.), The ideal of equality (pp. 126–161). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warnick, B. R. (2015). Taming the conflict over educational equality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(1), 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weishart, J. E. (2014). Transcending equality versus adequacy. Stanford Law Review, 66, 477–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. (1994). The dishwasher’s child: Education and the end of egalitarianism. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (2006). Liberty, equality, and property. In J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig, & A. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political theory (pp. 488–506). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar