Can political realism be action-guiding?

References

• Bertram, C. (1997). Political justification, theoretical complexity, and democratic community. Ethics, 107(4), 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1086/233760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906–944. https://doi.org/10.1086/293126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. (2018). Why I am an objectivist about ethics (and why you are too). In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), The ethical life: Fundamental reading in ethics and moral problems (4th ed., pp. 208–221). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, E., & Möller, N. (2018). Political legitimacy for our world: Where is political realism going? The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/694548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, C. (2007). Justice in ideal theory: A refutation. Political Studies, 55(4), 844–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, L. (2015). The political is political: Conformity and the illusion of dissent in contemporary political philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2012). Interpretative realism and prescriptive realism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2012.651883
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374001
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A. (2013). The feasibility constraint on the concept of justice. The Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2000). Two faces of liberalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2014). Contingency, confidence, and liberalism in the political thought of Bernard Williams. Social Theory and Practice, 40(4), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201440433
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2017). How to do realistic political theory (and why you might want to). European Journal of Political Theory, 16(3), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115577820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J. (2010). Realism, liberal moralism and a political theory of modus vivendi. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374004
   Google Scholar
• Horton, J. (2017). What might it mean for political theory to be more ‘realistic’? Philosophia, 45(2), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9799-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J. (2018). Modus vivendi and political legitimacy. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi (pp. 131–148). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jubb, R. (2015). The real value of equality. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1086/681262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. (2010). Modus vivendi liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2013). Justice for earthlings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2005). ‘Ideal theory’ as ideology’. Hypatia, 20(3), 165–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3811121
   Google Scholar
• Newey, G. (2001). After politics: The rejection of politics in contemporary liberal philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, J., & Rossi, E. (2017). Political realism as ideology critique. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1293908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515–572. DOI: 10.2307/2025790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1997). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. (2018). Can modus vivendi save liberalism from moralism? A critical assessment of John Gray’s political realism. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi (pp. 95–109). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., & Argenton, C. (2017). Libertarianism, capitalism, ideology: A reality check. working paper, available at https://bit.ly/2X4FZ1R
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(10), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12148
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2006). What do we want from a theory of justice? Journal of Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleat, M. (2013). Liberal realism: A realist theory of liberal politics. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleat, M. (2016). Realism, liberalism and non-ideal theory or, Are there two ways to do realistic political theory? Political Studies, 64(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2008). The value of philosophy in nonideal circumstances. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834322
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K.-C. (2012). Justice, institutions, and luck: The site, ground, and scope of equality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. (2009). On the apparent paradox of ideal theory. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(3), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, A. (2004). The nature of political theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, D. (2015). Against ideal guidance. The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/679495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. (G. Hawthorn, ed.). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar