The choice of efficiencies and the necessity of politics

References

• Anderson, E. (2006). The epistemology of democracy. Episteme, 3(1–2), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. (2017). The pipe dream of undemocratic liberalism. Journal of Democracy, 28(3), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. (2016). Experiments in distributive justice and their limits. Critical Review, 28 (3–4), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1254318
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G. (1989). Politics with romance: Towards a theory of democratic socialism. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. (2014). How smart is democracy? You can’t answer that question a priori. Critical Review, 26(1–2), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2014.907040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. (2016). Against democracy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1987). The constitution of economic policy. Science, 236(4807), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4807.1433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, B. (2011). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2010a). The constitution of equality: Democratic authority and its limits. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2010b). The uneasy relationship between democracy and capital. Social Philosophy and Policy, 27(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2012). Rational deliberation among experts and citizens. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 27–51). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeCanio, S. (2014). Democracy, the market, and the logic of social choice. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound: Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625008
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2013). Securities against misrule: Juries, assemblies, elections. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2009). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. (2008). Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? About what? Critical Review, 20(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810802503467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., & Spiekermann, K. (2018). An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. Oxford University Press doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823452.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. A. (2014). Against elections: The lottocratic alternative. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42(2), 135–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, J. (2006a). An adversarial ethic for business: Or when Sun-Tzu met the stakeholder. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9175-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, J. (2006b). The benefits of cooperation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34(4), 313–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufbauer, G. C. (2016). Investor-state dispute settlement. In C. Cimino-Isaacs & J. J. Schott (Eds.), Trans-pacific partnership: An assessment (pp. 197–212). Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, P. (2018). Efficiency or power? The rise of the shareholder-oriented joint stock corporation. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 25(1), 291–330. h ttps://d oi.org/org/1 0/gfth8p
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, S. T. (2015). Democracy despite ignorance: Questioning the veneration of knowledge in politics. Critical Review, 27(3–4), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2015.1111681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J., & Johnson, J. (2011). The priority of democracy: Political consequences of pragmatism. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landa, D., & Pevnick, R. (2020). Representative democracy as defensible epistocracy. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10/gg4hnt
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López-Guerra, C. (2011). The enfranchisement lottery. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X09372206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldoon, R. (2015). Expanding the justificatory framework of mill’s experiments in living. Utilitas, 27(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081400034X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1975). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. (1998). The market: Ethics, knowledge and politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. (2003). Hayekian political economy and the limits of deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. (2011). Robust political economy: Classical liberalism and the future of public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, M (2016). Robust political economy revisited: Response to critics. Critical Review, 28(3–4), 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1269424
   Google Scholar
• Pincione, G., & Tesón, F. R. (2006). Rational choice and democratic deliberation: A theory of discourse failure. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (1935). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Somin, I. (2013). Democracy and political ignorance: Why smaller government is smarter. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeule, A (2013). Collective wisdom and institutional design. In H. Landemore & J. Elster (Eds.). Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms (pp. 338–366). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar