Facts, principles, and global justice: does the ‘real world’ matter?

References

• Carens, J. (1987). Aliens and citizens: The case for open borders. Review of Politics, 49(2), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500033817
   Google Scholar
• Carens, J. (2013). The ethics of immigration. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2003). Facts and principles. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(3), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing justice and equality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, E., & Moller, N. (2019). How practices do not matter. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1403130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2011). Human nature and the limits (if any) of political philosophy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(3), 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2017). Methodological moralism in political philosophy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1293353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, C. (2007). Justice in ideal theory: A refutation. Political Studies, 55(4), 844–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, S. (2013). The ethics of immigration: Self-determination and the right to exclude. Philosophy Compass, 8(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12019
   Google Scholar
• Fine, S. (2016). Immigration and discrimination. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration in political theory: The ethics of movement and citizenship (pp. 125–150). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, S. (2017). Migration, political philosophy, and the real world. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(6), 719–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1231793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A. (2013). The feasibility constraint on the concept of justice. Philosophical Quarterly, 62(252), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12058
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2012). Political realism and fact-sensitivity. Res Publica, 19(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-012-9199-x
   Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, J., & Dare, T. (2017). The philosophical use and misuse of science. Metaphilosophy, 48(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford-Smith, H., & Gilabert, P. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leader-Maynard, J., & Worsnip, A. (2018). Is there a distinctively political normativity? Ethics, 128(4), 756–787. https://doi.org/10.1086/697449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2019). What Mr. Spock told the earthlings: The aims of political philosophy, action-guidingness, and fact-dependence. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1403127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1993). In defence of nationality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 10(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1993.tb00058.x
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1997). On nationality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2002). Two ways to think about justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 1(1), 5–28. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1177%2F1470594X02001001001
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2008a). Political philosophy for earthlings. In D. Leopold & M. Stears (Eds.), Political theory: Methods and approaches. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2008b). A response. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 11(4), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230802415961
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2013). Justice for earthlings: Essays in political philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2016a). In what sense must political philosophy be political? Social Philosophy & Policy, 33(1–2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052516000339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2016b). How ‘realistic’ should global political theory be? Some reflections on the debate so far. Journal of International Political Theory, 12(2), 217–233. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1177%2F1755088215626940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2016c). Strangers in our midst: The political philosophy of immigration. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2019). Doing political philosophy. In D. Butt, S. Fine, & Z. Stemplowska (Eds.), Political philosophy here and now: Essays in honour of David Miller. Oxford University Press. [In press].
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2005). ‘Ideal theory’ as ideology. Hypatia, 20(3), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00493.x
   Google Scholar
• Parr, T. (2018). How to identify disadvantage: Taking the envy test seriously. Political Studies, 66(2), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717720377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. (2008). Cohen to the rescue! Ratio, 21(4), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2008.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. (2016). Facts, principles, and (real) politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(2), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9647-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(10), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12148
   Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A. (2008). Justice and the priority of politics to morality. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A. (2016). How practices matter. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scavenius, T. (2019). Fact-sensitive political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1403119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2006). What do we want from a theory of justice? Journal of Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemplowska, Z. (2008). What’s ideal about ideal theory? Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834320
   Google Scholar
• Stemplowska, Z., & Swift, A. (2012). Ideal and non-ideal theory. In D. Estlund (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political philosophy (pp. 373–390). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stemplowska, Z., & Swift, A. (2018). Dethroning democratic legitimacy. In D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy: Volume 4 (pp. 3–27). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2008). The value of philosophy in non-ideal circumstances. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834322
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654–665.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2007). In the beginning was the deed. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (2011). Ethics and public policy: A philosophical inquiry. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (2015). Political philosophy and the real world of the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(4), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypi, L. (2012). Facts, principles, and the third man. Études Socialistes/Socialist Studies, 8(1), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.18740/S47595
   Google Scholar