Does collective unfreedom matter? Individualism, power and proletarian unfreedom

References

• Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1995). A note on freedom and flexibility. In K. Basu, P. K. Pattanaik, & K. Suzumura (Eds.), Choice, welfare, and development: A Festschrift in honour of Amartya K. Sen (pp. 7–16). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bossert, W. (1997). Opportunity sets and individual well-being. Social Choice and Welfare, 14(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P. K., & Xu, Y. (1994). Ranking opportunity sets: An axiomatic approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 63(2), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1994.1045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruin, B. D. (2009). Liberal and republican freedom*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(4), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, I. (1999). A measure of freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, I. (2005). The quality of freedom. Philosophical Review, 114(4), 551–553. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-114-4-551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, I. (2009). How are power and unfreedom related. In C. Laborde & J. W. Maynor (Eds.), Republicanism and political theory (pp. 58–82). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (1981). Illusions about private property and freedom. In J. Mepham & D. Ruben (Eds.), Issues in marxist philosophy (Vol. iv). Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (1988). History, Labour, and Freedom: Themes from Marx. Oxford: Clarendon Press
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2011a). Capitalism, freedom and the proletariat. In M. Otsuka (Ed.), On the currency of Egalitarian justice, and other essays in political philosophy (pp. 147–165). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2011b). Freedom and money. In M. Otsuka (Ed.), On the currency of Egalitarian justice, and other essays in political philosophy (pp. 166–200). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (2011). Republican freedom, rights, and the coalition problem. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10388380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, A. (2011). Labor and republican liberty. Constellations, 18(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2011.00644.x
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, A. (2012). Debt, freedom, and inequality. Philosophical Topics, 40(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20124019
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, A. (2013). Labor republicanism and the transformation of work. Political Theory, 41(4), 0090591713485370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591713485370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (1988). Against Cohen on proletarian unfreedom. Social Philosophy and Policy, 6(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500002697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hees, M. V. (1998). On the analysis of negative freedom. Theory and Decision, 45(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004938512267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hees, M. V. (2004). Freedom of choice and diversity of options: Some difficulties. Social Choice and Welfare, 22(1), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0285-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hees, M. V. (2012). Legal reductionism and freedom. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, K. M. (2013). “If you tickle us….”: How corporations can be moral agents without being persons. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 47(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-013-9391-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindriks, F. (2008). The freedom of collective agents*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindriks, F. (2014). How autonomous are collective agents? Corporate rights and normative individualism. Erkenntnis, 79(S9), 1565–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9629-6
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, L.-P. (2010). Kant on the right to freedom: A defense. Ethics, 120(4), 791–819. https://doi.org/10.1086/653687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klemisch-Ahlert, M. (1993). Freedom of choice: A comparison of different rankings of opportunity sets. Social Choice and Welfare, 10(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N. (2019). Being under the power of others. In Y. Elazar & R. Genevieve (Eds.), Republicanism and the future of democracy (pp. 94–114). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. H. (2003). The quality of freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. H. (2009). Liberty and domination. In C. Laborde & J. Maynor (Eds.), Republicanism and political theory (pp. 31–57). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (1996). Social freedom: The responsibility view. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C., & Maynor, J. (2009). Republicanism and political theory. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, G. (2012). Invigilating republican liberty. The Philosophical Quarterly, 62(247), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. (2003). Liberal and republican conceptions of freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230510001702693
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., & White, S. (2020). Radical republicanism: Recovering the tradition’s popular heritage. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., & Valentini, L. (2016). Freedom as independence. Ethics, 126(4), 1043–1074. https://doi.org/10.1086/686006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. (2010). A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the modern world. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, C. (2005). The indeterminacy of republican policy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(1), 67–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). Constraints on Freedom. Ethics, 94(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/292510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (2019). Moving up without losing your way: The ethical costs of upward mobility. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, J. (2019). A socialist republican theory of freedom and government. European Journal of Political Theory, 147488511984760. online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119847606
   Google Scholar
• Nehring, K., & Puppe, C. (1999). On the multi-preference approach to evaluating opportunities. Social Choice and Welfare, 16(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhouser, F. (1993). Freedom, dependence, and the general will. The Philosophical Review, 102(3), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, R. J. (1987). Free and equal: A philosophical examination of political values. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, T. (2020). Socialist republicanism. Political Theory, 48(5), 548–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591719876889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parijs, P. V. (1997). Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pattanaik, P. K., & Xu, Y. (1990). On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Recherches Économiques de Louvain/Louvain Economic Review, 56(3/4), 383–390.
   Google Scholar
• Pattanaik, P. K., & Xu, Y. (1998). On preference and freedom. Theory and Decision, 44(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004924211553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattanaik, P. K., & Xu, Y. (2000). On diversity and freedom of choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 40(2), 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2003). Agency-freedom and option-freedom. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803154003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2006). Freedom in the market. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 5(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x06064218
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2007a). A republican right to basic income. Basic Income Studies, 2(2).
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2007b). Free persons and free choices. History of Political Thought, 28(4), 709–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2011). The instability of freedom as noninterference: The case of Isaiah Berlin. Ethics, 121(4), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1086/660694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2013). Two republican traditions. In A. Niederberger & P. Schink (Eds.), Republican democracy: Liberty, law and politics (pp. 169–204). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2014). Just freedom: A moral compass for a complex world. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Puppe, C. (1996). An axiomatic approach to “preference for freedom of choice”. Journal of Economic Theory, 68(1), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripstein, A. (2010). Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, W. C. (2019). Marx’s social republic: Political not metaphysical. Historical Materialism, 27(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. E. (2000). Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2016). Kant, freedom as independence, and democracy. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1086/685448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, -J.-J. (1754). Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among mankind. In S. Dunn (Ed.), The social contract and the first and second discourses (2002nd ed.). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, -J.-J. (1762). The social contract. In S. Dunn (Ed.), The social contract and the first and second discourses (2002nd ed.). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. T. (2016). Abilities and the sources of unfreedom. Ethics, 127(1), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1086/687335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. T. (2017). An unresolved problem: Freedom across lifetimes. Philosophical Studies, 174(6), 1413–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. T. (2018). Domination without inequality? Mutual domination, republicanism, and gun control. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 46(2), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1988). Freedom of choice: Concept and content. European Economic Review, 32(2–3), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1991). Welfare, preference and freedom. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1–2), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(91)90087-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom (1st. ed.). Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Shnayderman, R. (2012). Liberal vs. republican notions of freedom. Political Studies, 60(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00900.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W. (2017). The impossibility of republican freedom. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 45(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (2012). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, H. (1873). Social statics; Or, the conditions essential to human happiness specified, & the first of them developed. D. Appleton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H. (1977). The structure of a set of compossible rights. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(12), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, H. (1983). How free: Computing personal liberty. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 15, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100002769
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H. (1994). An essay on rights. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sudgen, R. (1998). The metric of opportunity. Economics and Philosophy, 14(2), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100003874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talisse, R. B. (2014). Impunity and domination: A puzzle for republicanism. European Journal of Political Theory, 13(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885112463657
   Google Scholar
• Vrousalis, N. (2015). The Political Philosophy of G. A. Cohen: Back to Socialist Basics. Bloomsbury Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar