Basic human needs: abstraction, indeterminacy and the political account of need

References

• Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alkire, S. (2005). Needs and capabilities. In S. Reader (Ed.), The philosophy of need (pp. 229–251). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braybrooke, D. (1987). Meeting needs. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, G. (1998). Morally important needs. Philosophia, 26(1–2), 165–178. 10.1007/BF02380064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, G. (2002). Are there any defensible indigenous rights? Contemporary Political Theory, 1(3), 285–305. 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300052.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, G. (2009). Global justice: A cosmopolitan account. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, D. (1992). The right to an adequate standard of living: Justice, autonomy, and the basic needs. Social Philosophy & Policy, 9(1), 231–261. 10.1017/S0265052500003666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, D. (1995). Morality, normativity, and society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, D. (1998). Equality, justice and the basic needs. In G. Brock (Ed.), Necessary goods: Our responsibilities to meet others’ needs (pp. 113–134). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, D. (2005). International justice and the basic needs principle. In G. Brock & H. Brighouse (Eds.), The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism (pp. 39–54). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, H. (2010). Understanding human need: Social issues, policy and practice. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L. (1993). Thinking about human need. New Left Review, 201, 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2011). Why we need needs-based justifications of human rights. Journal of International Political Theory, 7(1), 103–115. 10.3366/jipt.2011.0008.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1998). Necessity and desire. In G. Brock (Ed.), Necessary goods: Our responsibilities to meet others’ needs (pp. 19–32). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 385–411. 10.1177/1474885110374001.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development: From economism to human development. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. (2003). The political philosophy of needs. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, A. (1993). A theory of needs revisited. Thesis Eleven, 35(1), 18–35. 10.1177/072551369303500103
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. (1993). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, M., Owen, D., Hoover, J., Woodford, C., Finlayson, A., Stears, M., & Honig, B. (2014). Humanism from an agonistic perspective: Themes from the work of Bonnie Honig. Contemporary Political Theory, 13(2), 168–217. 10.1057/cpt.2013.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2014). Towards a theory of cultural evaluation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(2), 145–167. 10.1080/13698230.2012.680753.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2001). Principles of social justice (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2012). Grounding human rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15(4), 407–427. 10.1080/13698230.2012.699396.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. C. (2012). The ethics of need: Agency, dignity, and obligation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political Theory, 9(3), 327–352. 10.1177/009059178100900304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. (2002). Needs, agency and welfare rights. In C. Wellman (Ed.), Rights and duties (pp. 157–176). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, S. (2005). Aristotle on necessities and needs. In S. Reader (Ed.), The philosophy of need (pp. 113–136). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, S. (2006). Does a basic needs approach need capabilities?. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 337–350. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00259.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader, S. (2007). Needs and moral necessity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, A. (2010). The politics of need. In D. Celermajer, V. Karalis, & A. Schaap (Eds.), Power, judgment and political evil: In conversation with Hannah Arendt (pp. 157–170). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schuppert, F. (2013). Distinguishing basic needs and fundamental interests. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(1), 24–44. 10.1080/13698230.2011.583532.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1995). Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siebel, M., & Schramme, T. (2020). Need-based justice from the perspective of philosophy. In S. Traub & B. Kittel (Eds.), Need-based distributive justice (pp. 21–58). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, K. (1981). On human needs: Open and closed theories in a Marxist perspective. Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, K. (1993a). A theory of human need. New Left Review, 197, 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, K. (1993b). The thick and thin of human needing. In G. Drover & P. Kerans (Eds.), New approaches to welfare theory (pp. 69–81). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, K. (2007). Conceptualizing needs in the context of consumer politics. Journal of Consumer Policy, 29(4), 355–372. 10.1007/s10603-006-9017-y.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, G. (1987). Needs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, D. (1998). Needs, values, truth: Essays in the philosophy of value (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar