The function of the ideal in liberal democratic contexts

References

• Aligica, P. D. (2014). Institutional diversity and political economy: The Ostroms and beyond. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., & Steurer, R. (2014). Multi-level governance of climate change adaptation through regional partnerships in Canada and England. Geoforum, 51, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbio, N. (1987). The future of democracy: A defence of the rules of the game. (R. Bellamy, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2011). The New British policy style: From a British to a Scottish political tradition? Political Studies Review, 9(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2002). If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re so Rich? Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, S., Harding, M., & Reschovsky, A. (2019). Twenty years of tax autonomy across levels of government: Measurement and applications. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism No. 29.
   Google Scholar
• Enderlein, H., Wälti, S., & Zürn, M. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook on multi-level governance. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, T., Downe, J., Guarneros-Meza, V., & Martin, S. (2014). The multi-level governance of wales: Layer cake or Marble cake? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(2), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (1998). Debate: Liberalism, equality, and fraternity in Cohen’s critique of rawls. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. F. (2016). The Tyranny of the ideal: Justice in a diverse society. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (1995). Political ideals and political practice. British Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007055
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2000). Two faces of liberalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(02), doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, J. (2010). Realism, liberal moralism and a political theory of modus vivendi. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374004
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. (2009). The Limits of Practical Possibility*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jubb, R. (2012). Tragedies of non-ideal theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 11(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885111430611
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawford-Smith, H. (2013). Understanding political feasibility. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. M. (2017). The captured economy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, R. G., & Lancaster, K. (1956). The General Theory of Second Best. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckled-Garcia, S. (2008). On the very idea of cosmopolitan justice: Constructivism and international agency. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(3), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00281.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidner, R. (1993). Why did the swedish model fail? Socialist Register, 29 https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5630/2528.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and partiality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019) . OECD multi-level governance studies: Making decentralisation work: A Handbook for policy-makers.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V. (1972). Polycentricity. Workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2005). Multi-level governance and democracy. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 75–93). Oxford Univerisity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlins, M. D., & Culyer, A. J. (2004). National institute for clinical excellence and its value judgments. British Medical Journal, 329(7459), 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2008). Ideal theory in theory and practice. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 341–362. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834321
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. (2010). Ideal and Nonideal theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, H. (2013). Liberalism, neutrality and exploitation. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 12(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X13496065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2008). The value of philosophy in nonideal circumstances. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 363–387. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834322
   Google Scholar
• UK Government website. (2021). Departments, agencies and public bodies. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. (2017). The natural duty of justice in non-ideal circumstances: On the moral demands of institution building and reform. European Journal of Political Theory, 20(1), doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885117742094.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeule, A. (2016). Law’s abnegation: From law’s empire to the administrative state. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vibert, F. (2007). The rise of the unelected: Democracy and the new separation of powers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2004). Law and disagreement. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, D. (2015). Political ideals and the feasibility frontier. Economics and Philosophy, 31(3), 447–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267115000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar