Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: Alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology

References

• Arnall , A. H. 2003 . Future Technologies, Today's Choices: Nanotechnology, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. A report for the Greenpeace Environmental Trust , London : Greenpeace .
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield , D. , Collins , K. , Fry , C. and Munton , R. 2001 . Deliberation and inclusion: Vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance? . Environment and Planning C , 19 : 501 – 513 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Embassy . 2006 . Nanotechnology Update: France , Paris : British Embassy . Accessed 15 September 2006, available at www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front/TextOnly?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1153387506734&to=true
   Google Scholar
• Charles , D. 2001 . Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food , Cambridge, MA : Perseus Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , J. C. 2006 . Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology , Washington, DC : Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies .
   Google Scholar
• Defra . 2006 . UK Voluntary Reporting Scheme for Engineered Nanoscale Materials , London : Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs .
   Google Scholar
• DTI . 2005 . Response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering Report: “Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties” , London : HM Government .
   Google Scholar
• EC . 2004 . Towards a European Strategy on Nanotechnology , Brussels : European Commission .
   Google Scholar
• EC . Some Figures about Nanotechnology R&D in Europe and Beyond . European Commission staff working paper . December 8th 2005 . Brussels : European Commission .
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation . 2006 . Nanomedicine: An ESF – European Medical Research Councils (EMRC) Forward Look Report , Strasbourg : European Science Foundation .
   Google Scholar
• ETC . 2002 . No small matter! Communiqué, 76 , Winnipeg : ETC Group .
   Google Scholar
• ETC . 2003 . The Big Down: From Genomes to Atoms , Winnipeg : ETC Group .
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell , G. , Ten Eyck , T. , Jackson , J. and Veltri , G. 2005 . Imagining nanotechnology: Cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States . Public Understanding of Science , 14 : 81 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove-White , R. , Macnaghten , P. and Wynne , B. 2000 . Wising Up: The Public and New Technologies , Lancaster : Centre for the Study of Environmental Change .
   Google Scholar
• Guston , D. and Sarewitz , D. 2002 . Real-time technology assessment . Technology in Society , 24 : 93 – 109 .
   Google Scholar
• Hullmann , A. 2006 . Who is winning the global nanorace? . Nature Nanotechnology , 1 : 81 – 83 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff , S. 2005 . Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States , Princeton : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kearnes , M. , Macnaghten , P. and Wilsdon , J. 2006 . Governing at the Nanoscale: People, Policies and Emerging Technologies , London : Demos .
   Google Scholar
• Lynch , M. 2000 . Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge . Theory, Culture & Society , 17 : 26 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten , P. , Kearnes , M. and Wynne , B. 2005 . Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences?” . Science Communication , 27 : 1 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macoubrie , J. 2005 . Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government , Washington, DC : Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies .
   Google Scholar
• Madison Area Citizen Consensus Conference . 2005 . Report of the Madison Area Citizen Consensus Conference on Nanotechnology , Madison : Madison Area Citizen Consensus Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Maynard , A. 2006 . Nanotechnology: A Research Strategy for Addressing Risk , Washington, DC : Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies .
   Google Scholar
• Merrill Lynch . 2004 . Nanotechnology: Introducing the Merrill Lynch Nanotech Index , New York : Merrill Lynch . A Merrill Lynch Industry Report
   Google Scholar
• Munich Re . 2002 . Nanotechnology – What is in Store for Us? , Munich : Munich Re .
   Google Scholar
• NanoJury . 2005 . NanoJury UK: Our Provisional Recommendations , London : NanoJury UK . Available at www.greenpeace.org.uk/contentlookup.cfm?CFID=1044260&CFTOKEN=&ucidparam=20050926143910
   Google Scholar
• Nature . 2004 . Going public . Nature , 431 : 883
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann , A. Converging Technologies: Shaping the Future of European Societies . A report by the High Level Expert Group on Foresighting the New Technology Wave . Brussels : European Commission .
   Google Scholar
• OECD . Building Co-operation, Co-ordination and Communication . Report of the OECD Workshop on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials . December 7 – 9 2005 , Washington, DC. Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development .
   Google Scholar
• Renn , O. and Roco , M. 2006 . Nanotechnology Risk Governance , Geneva : International Risk Governance Council .
   Google Scholar
• Rip , A. Constructive technology assessment of nanotechnology . Presentation to the European Workshop on Social and Economic Issues of Nanotechnologies and Nanosciences, European Commission . April 14 – 15 2004 , Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Rip A. Misa T. J. Schot J. (1995) Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment London Pinter
   Google Scholar
• Roco , M. 2003 . Broader societal issues of nanotechnology . Journal of Nanoparticle Research , 5 : 181 – 189 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roco M. Bainbridge W. S. Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. NSET Workshop Report Arlington National Science Foundation 2001
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society/RAE . 2004 . Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties , London : Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering .
   Google Scholar
• Schummer , J. 2004a . Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology . Scientometrics , 59 : 425 – 465 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schummer , J. 2004b . ‘Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology’: Meanings, Interest Groups, and Social Dynamics . Techné , 8 : 56 – 87 .
   Google Scholar
• Small Talk . 2006 . Small Talk: Project Report , London : Think-Lab .
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe , J. 2006 . A People's Inquiry on Nanotechnology and the Environment , London : Demos .
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Re . 2004 . Nanotechnology: Small Matter, Many Unknowns , Zurich : Swiss Re .
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO . 2006 . The Ethics and Politics of Nanotechnology , Paris : United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation .
   Google Scholar
• US Congress . 2006 . Research on Environmental and Safety Impacts of Nanotechnology: What are the Federal Agencies Doing? Hearing of the House Committee on Science, 21 September 2006. Available at www.house.gov/science/webcast/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Van Amerom , M. and Rip , A. Actor-strategies and actor constellations in the Nanotech Risk Debate . Presentation to the EASST Conference . August 23 – 26 2006 . University of Lausanne .
   Google Scholar
• Vogel , V. and Baird , B. Nanobiotechnology . Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop . October , Washington, DC..
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon , J. and Willis , R. 2004 . See-through Science: why public engagement needs to move upstream , London : Demos .
   Google Scholar
• Wynne , B. 2001 . Expert discourses of risk and ethics on genetically manipulated organisms: the weaving of public alienation . Politeia , 62 : 51 – 76 .
   Google Scholar