Living alongside hazardous factories: risk, choice and necessity

References

• Bailly, A., 1996. A la découverte des Etats-Unis. L’espace géographique, 4, 289–290.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., 2004. Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience or fair pollution. Environment international, 30, 827–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P., and Pidgeon, P., 2006. Situating local experience of risk: peripherality, marginality and place identity in the UK foot and mouth disease crisis. Geoforum, 37, 844–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudon, R., 1997. The art of self-persuasion: the social explanation of false beliefs. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R., 2001. The origin of values: sociology and philosophy of beliefs. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R., 2003a. Raison, bonnes raisons. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R., 2003b. Beyond rational choice theory. Annual review of sociology, 29, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, J., Moffatt, S., and Dunn, C., 2001. ‘Even the birds round here cough’: stigma, air pollution and health in Teeside. Health and place, 7, 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, R., 2003. Les Métamorphoses de la question sociale: Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. and Godard, F., 1974. Monopolville. L‘entreprise, l‘Etat et l‘urbain. Paris: EPHE.
   Google Scholar
• Cavailhès, J., 2005. Le prix des attributs du logement. Economie et statistique, 381, 91–123. 
   Google Scholar
• Charles, L., et al., 2007. Les multiples facettes des inégalités écologiques. Développement durable et territoire, dossier 9: Inégalités écologiques, inégalités sociales. Available from: http://developpementdurable.revues.org/document3892.html [Accessed 28 August 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Chauvier, E., 2007. Populations précaires et environnement à risques industriels: préjugés, non dits et enjeux implicites de l’action publique. Socio-logos, 2. Available from: http://socio-logos.revues.org/document387.html [Accessed 28 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Coanus, T., Duchêne, F., and Martinais, E., 2007. L’industrie chimique et ses riverains: une relation ambivalente. Le cas de la grande région lyonnaise. Annales des mines, responsabilité et environnement, 48, 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Coing, H. and Ferry-Bercoff, R., 1973. La planification urbaine à Dunkerque. Paris: Rapport de synthèse, Beture.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P.R., 2003. Risky business? Relying on empirical studies to assess environmental justice. In: G.R. Visgilio and D.M. Whitelaw, eds. Our backyard, a quest for environmental justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littefield, 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, Y., 2008. The Concise encyclopedia of statistics. Heidelberg: Springer Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., 1992. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavski, A., 1984. Risk and culture, an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. and Scotson, J.L., 1994. The established and the outsiders: a sociological enquiry into community problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 2009. Reason and rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emelianoff, C., 1999. La ville durable, un modèle émergent. Géoscopie du réseau européen des villes durables. Thesis. Université d’Orléans.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F., 1891. The condition of the working class in England in 1844. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischoff, B., et al., 1978. How safe is safe enough: a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy sciences, 9, 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanquart, H., 2012. An unwelcome user? Or how to negotiate the use of a risky space. Journal of risk research, 15, 1261–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanquart, H., Hellequin, A.-P., and Vallet, P., 2006, Un village bien tranquille…Vivre à Mardyck, à proximité d’usines « Seveso », rapport de contrat DDE.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C., 2003. La fabrique des risques. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, CXIV, 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gjernes, T., 2008. Perception of risk and uncertainty among Sámi women involved in reindeer herding in Northern Norway. Health, risk & society, 10 (5), 505–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimer, C.A., 1988. Social structure, psychology, and the estimation of risk. Annual review of sociology, 14, 491–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., et al., 2008. Risk, framing and everyday life: epistemological and methodological reflections from three socio-cultural projects. Health, risk and society, 10 (5), 421–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., et al., 2010. Researching risk: narrative, biography, subjectivity. Forum qualitative Socialforsschung/Forum qualitative social research, 11 (1), art 20. Available from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1001201.
   Google Scholar
• INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques), 1999. Recensement Général de la Population. Available from: http://www.recensement-1999.insee.fr/. 
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., 1982. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laigle, L. and Oelher, V., 2004. How to integrate social and environmental aspects in housing and urban policies: some experiences from France and Germany. In: N. Marchettini, C.A. Brebbia, E. Tiezzi and L.C. Wadhwa, eds. The sustainable city III, urban regeneration and sustainability. Ashurst Lodge, UK: WIT Press, 443–452.
   Google Scholar
• Laigle, L. and Tual, M. 2007. Conceptions des inégalités écologiques dans cinq pays européens: quelle place dans les politiques de développement urbain durable? Développement Durable et Territoire, Dossier 9: Inégalités écologiques, inégalités sociales. Available from: developpementdurable.revues.org/document4262.html [Accessed 2 September 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., 2008a. Environmental injustice in France. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51 (1), 55–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., 2008b. La distribution des risques environnementaux: méthodes d’analyse et données françaises. Population (English Edition), 4, 711–729.
   Google Scholar
• Leroy, P., 2001. La sociologie de l’environnement en Europe. Nature, sciences, sociétés, 9 (1), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lins Hamelin, C., 2002. Beyond relativism: Raymond Boudon, cognitive rationality and critical realism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., 2001. Environmental justice analysis: theories, methods and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 2005. Risk: a sociological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Lussault, M., 2000. La ville des géographes. In: T. Paquot, M. Lussault, and S. Body-Gendrot, eds. La ville et l’urbain. L’état des savoirs. Paris: La Découverte, Syros.
   Google Scholar
• Massard-Guilbaud, G., 2002. De la ‘part du milieu’ à l’histoire de l’environnement. Le mouvement social, 200, 64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K., et al., 2010. From the familiar to the extraordinary: local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 35, 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretti-Watel, P., 2000. Sociologie du risque. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Piattelli Palmarini, M., 1995. La réforme du jugement ou comment ne plus se tromper. Paris: Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. and Beattie, J., 1998. The psychology of risk and uncertainty. In: P. Calow, ed. Handbook of environmental risk assessment and management. Oxford: Blackwell, 289–318.
   Google Scholar
• Ratouis, O. and Segaud, M., 1996. Dunkerque: un rapport exemplaire entre agglomeration et Etat? Dunkerque: Institut des mers du Nord, Plan Urbain/MELT.
   Google Scholar
• Ratouis, O. and Segaud, M., 2000. Vers une maîtrise d’ouvrage territorial, les projets urbains du littoral Nord Pas-de-Calais entre aménagement et développement. Dunkerque: Institut des mers du Nord, Plan Urbain/MELT.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. and Anderson, C.A., 1982. Shortcomings in the attribution process: on the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments. In: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, eds. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., and Roth, C., 2000. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk analysis, 20 (3), 353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H., 1982. Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., 1995. Explaining risk perception: an empirical and quantitative evaluation of cultural theory. (Rhizikon: Risk Research Report No. 22), Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics, Center for Risk Research.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., 1987. Perception of risk. Science, 4799, 280–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoczkowski, W., 1999. Des hommes, des dieux et des extraterrestres. Ethnologie d‘une croyance moderne. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Teuber, A., 1990. Justifying risk. Daedalus, journal of the American academy of arts and sciences, 119 (4), 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J. and Lupton, D., 2003. Risk and everyday life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S., et al., 2001. Environmental risk and (re)action air quality, health and civic involvement in an urban industrial neighbourhood. Health and place, 7, 163–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., et al., 2005. Industrial pollution and social deprivation: evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to environmental inequality. Local environment, 10 (4), 361–377.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1949. The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, L., 1990. Le phénomène urbain comme mode de vie. In: Y. Grafmeyer and I. Joseph, eds. L’Ecole de Chicago. Naissance de l’Ecologie Urbaine. Paris: Aubier, 255–281. 
   Google Scholar
• Zonabend, F., 1993. The Nuclear Peninsula. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarterook, I. 2010, Les risques de pollutions industriels sur le territoire Dunkerquois: des perceptions à la concertation, Les cahiers de la sécurité industrielle, Toulouse, 2010-7.
   Google Scholar