Negotiating risky bodies: childbirth and constructions of risk

References

• Annandale, E., 1988. How midwives accomplish natural birth: managing risk and balancing expectation. Social problems, 35 (2), 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bogg, L., et al., 2010. Dramatic increase of Cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Social science & medicine, 70, 1544–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, D., et al., 2009. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. Journal of midwifery & women’s health, 54, 119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 2005. Habitus. In: J. Hillier and E. Rooksby, eds. Habitus: a sense of place. Aldershot: Ashgate, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bradby, B., 1998. Like a video: the sexualisation of childbirth in Bolivia. Reproductive health matters, 6 (12), 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., et al., 2007. Caesarean birth: consumption, safety, order and good mothering. Social science & medicine, 65, 1192–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. and Foster, D., 2013. Technologies of gender and childbirth choices: home birth, elective caesarean and white femininities in South Africa. Feminism & psychology, 23 (3), 317–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheyney, M., 2008. Homebirth as systems-challenging praxis: knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qualitative health research, 18, 254–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheyney, M., 2011. Reinscribing the birthing body: homebirth as ritual performance. Medical anthropology quarterly, 25 (4), 519–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R., 2003. Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. and Sargent, C., eds., 1997. Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, A., 2012. Shifting maternal responsibilities and the trajectory of blame in northern Ghana. In: L. Fordyce and A. Maraesa, eds. Risk, reproduction, and narratives of experience. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, S. and Chacham, A., 2004. ‘The cut above’ and ‘the cut below’: the abuse of caesareans and episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil. Reproductive health matters, 12, 100–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douché, J. and Carryer, J., 2011. Caesarean section in the absence of need: a pathologising paradox for public health? Nursing inquiry, 18 (2), 143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, N., 2005. Birthing autonomy: women’s experiences of planning home births. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, N. and Murphy-Lawless, J., 2006. The instability of risk: women’s perspectives on risk and safety in childbirth. In: A. Symon, ed. Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, J., Staff, L., and Creedy, D., 2010. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery, 26, 394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. and Worts, D., 1999. Revisiting the critique of medicalized childbirth: a contribution to the sociology of birth. Gender & society, 13 (3), 326–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E., 1989. Sexual subversions: three French feminists. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, B., 2005. Risky business: framing childbirth in hospital settings. Journal of medical humanities, 26 (1), 23–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helén, I., 2004. Technics over life: risk, ethics and the existential condition in high-tech antenatal care. Economy & society, 33 (1), 28–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., 1997. Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In: R. Davis-Floyd and C. Sargent, eds. Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Karlström, A., et al., 2011. Behind the myth – few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of obstetrical factors. Midwifery, 27 (5), 620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelhä, M., 2009. Too old to become a mother? Risk constructions in 35+ women’s experiences of pregnancy, child-birth, and postnatal care. Nordic journal of feminist & gender research, 17 (2), 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, C., et al., 2003. Who’s choosing caesarean section? British journal of midwifery, 11 (6), 391.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, P., 2001. Blessed events: religion and home birth in America. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knaak, S., 2010. Contextualising risk, constructing choice: breastfeeding and good mothering in risk society. Health, risk & society, 12 (4), 369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornelsen, J., 2005. Essences and imperatives: an investigation of technology in childbirth. Social science & medicine, 61, 1495–1504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankshear, G., Ettore, E., and Mason, D., 2005. Decision-making, uncertainty and risk: exploring the complexity of work processes in NHS delivery suites. Health, risk & society, 7 (4), 361–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., 2000. The politics of breastfeeding: assessing risk, dividing labor. Signs, 25 (2), 407–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrie, T., de Jager, M., and Hofmeyr, J., 2001. High cesarean section rates for pregnant medical practitioners in South Africa. International journal of gynecology & obstetrics, 72 (1), 71–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., 2007a. Health, morality and infant feeding: British mothers experiences of formula milk use in the early weeks. Sociology of health & illness, 29 (7), 1075–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., 2007b. Infant feeding in risk society. Health, risk & society, 9 (3), 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., 2008. Living with risk in the age of ‘intensive motherhood’: maternal identity and infant feeding. Health, risk & society, 10 (5), 467–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, H., et al., 2008. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery, 26, 163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., 1999a. Risk. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. ed., 1999b. Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., ed., 1999c. Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. In Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge University Press, 59–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., 2008. You feel so responsible’: australian mothers’ concepts and experiences related to promoting the health and development of their young children. In: H. Zoller and M. Dutta, eds. Emerging perspectives in health communication: meaning, culture, and power. New York: Routledge, 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., 2011. ‘The best thing for the baby’: mothers’ concepts and experiences related to promoting their infants’ health and development. Health, risk & society, 13 (7–8), 637–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., 2012. ‘Precious cargo’: foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical public health, 22 (3), 329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J., 1998. The adolescent ‘unfinished body’: reflexivity and HIV/AIDS risk. Body & society, 4 (2), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J., 2002a. ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, risk & society, 4 (2), 113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J., 2002b. Risk is part of your life’: risk epistemologies among a group of Australians. Sociology, 36 (2), 317–334.
   Google Scholar
• Lyerly, A., 2006. Shame, gender, birth. Hypatia, 21 (1), 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, M., 2006. Gender expectations: natural bodies and natural births in the new midwifery in Canada. Medical anthropology quarterly, 20 (2), 235–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie Bryers, H. and van Teijlingen, E., 2010. Risk, theory, social and medical models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery, 26 (5), 488–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., 1987. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, C., Bick, D., and Weaver, J., 2004. Caesarean section: perceived demand. British journal of midwifery, 12 (7), 412–413.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K., Amir, L., and Davey, M., 2011. Maternal bodies and medicines: a commentary on risk and decision-making of pregnant and breastfeeding women and health professionals. BMC public health, 11 (5), S5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. and Shriver, T., 2012. Women’s childbirth preferences and practices in the United States. Social science & medicine, 75, 709–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, S., Kornelsen, J., and Hutton, E., 2009. Decision-making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories. Journal of midwifery & women’s health, 54 (4), 373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., 2003. Expertise and forms of knowledge in the government of families. Sociology of health & illness, 51 (4), 433–462.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., 2004. Risk, maternal ideologies, and infant feeding. In: J. Germov and L. Williams, eds. A sociology of food and nutrition. Oxford University Press, 242–258.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, N. and Moodley, J., 2009. Rising rates of caesarean sections: an audit of caesarean sections in specialist private practice. South African family practice, 51 (3), 254–258.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I., 1992. Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Possamai-Inesedy, A., 2006. Confining risk: choice and responsibility in childbirth in a risk society. Health sociology review, 15, 406–414.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., 1997. Discourse and critical social psychology. In: T. Ibanez and L. Iniguez, eds. Critical social psychology. London: Sage, 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Root, R. and Browner, C., 2001. Practices of the pregnant self: compliance with and resistance to prenatal norms. Culture, medicine & psychiatry, 25, 195–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothberg, A. and Macleod, H., 2005. Private-sector caesarean sections in perspective. South African medical journal, 95 (4), 257–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, B., 1982. In labor: women and power in the birthplace. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhl, L., 1999. Liberal governance and prenatal care: risk and regulation in pregnancy. Economy & society, 28 (1), 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., 2011. The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: a tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociology of health & illness, 33 (7), 987–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M. and Alaszewski, A., 2012. Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, risk & society, 14 (2), 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, C., et al., 2010. ‘Lending the space’: midwives perceptions of birth space and clinical risk management. Midwifery, 26, 526–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Oka, V., 2012. Bodies of risk: constructing motherhood in a Mexican public hospital. Social science and medicine, 75, 2275–2282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V., Devane, D., and Murphy-Lawless, J., 2012. Risk in maternity care: a concept analysis. International journal of childbirth, 2 (2), 126–135.
   Google Scholar
• South African Demographic and Health Survey. 2003, 2007. Department of Health, Medical Research Council. Pretoria: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Tshibangu, K., et al., 2002. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector – 3-year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital. South African medical journal, 92 (12), 956–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J. and Lupton, D. eds., 2003. Risk and everyday life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Viisainen, K., 2000. The moral dangers of home birth: parents’ perceptions of risks in home birth in Finland. Sociology of health & illness, 22 (6), 792–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar