Risk in pregnancy and birth: are we talking to ourselves?

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2011). Planned home birth: Committee Opinion No. 476. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 117, 425–428.
   Google Scholar
• Annandale, E. (1989). The malpractice crisis and the doctor-patient relationship. Sociology of Health and Illness, 11(1), 1–23. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep10843996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arney, W. R. (1982). Power and the profession of obstetrics (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1999). World risk society (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béhague, D. P., Kanhonou, L. G., Filippi, V., Lègonou, S., & Ronsmans, C. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu and transformative agency: A study of how patients in Benin negotiate blame and accountability in the context of severe obstetric events. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30, 489–510. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01070.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2002). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., & Crawford, P. (2003). The clinical governance of the soul: ‘Deep management’ and the self-regulating subject in integrated community mental health teams. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 67–81. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00008-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., Porter, M., Tracy, S. K., & Sullivan, E. A. (2007). Caesarean birth: Consumption, safety, order and good mothering. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 1192–1201. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, H. (2007). Birth dirt. In M. Kirkham (Ed.), Exploring the dirty side of women’s health (pp. 9–29). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N. D. (2005). Drug-using women as criminal perpetrators drug-using women as criminal perpetrators? Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. J., & Foster, D. (2014). Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 68–83. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.863852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Sandall, J., & Fulop, N. J. (2014). To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 51–67. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.859231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Risk, pregnancy and childbirth: What do we currently know and what do we need to know? An editorial. Health, Risk & Society, 14(6), 503–510. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.709486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H. G., Jackson, M., & Stevens, J. (2011). Homebirth, freebirth and doulas: Casualty and consequences of a broken maternity system. Women and Birth : Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 24(1), 47–50. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2010.11.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1990). The role of obstetrical rituals in the resolution of cultural anomaly. Social Science and Medicine, 31(2), 175–189. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90060-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1994). The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1125–1140. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90228-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1993). Changing childbirth: Report of the expert maternity group. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Donnison, J. (1988). Midwives and medical men (2nd ed.). London: Historical Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1996). Natural symbols (2nd ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). Right of death and power over life (from the history of sexuality, Vol. 1). In R. Paul (Ed.), The foucault reader (pp. 258–272). London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J. (1997). Is there life after foucault? Texts, frames and differends. In A. Petersen & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault health and medicine (1st ed., pp. 31–50). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991a). Modernity and self identity: Self and society in the late modern age (Vol. 1). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991b). Modernity and self-identify: Self and society in the late modern age (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsdottir, H. K., & Benner, B. E. (2014). ‘Knowledge is power’: Risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 7–21. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.866216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, R., & Inglin, S. (2014). ‘I don’t think it’s risky, but…’: Pregnant women’s risk perceptions of maternal drinking and smoking. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 22–35. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.863851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., & Wood, B. (2000). Scientific-bureaucratic medicine and UK health policy. Review of Policy Research, 17(4), 25–42. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00955.x
   Google Scholar
• Jette, S., Vertinsky, P., & Ng, C. (2014). Balance and biomedicine: How chinese-canadian women negotiate pregnancy-related ‘risk’ and lifestyle directives. Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 494–511. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.942603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, S., & Lawler, S. (2008). Identity: Sociological perspectives. (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Macvarish, J., & Bristow, J. (2010). Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk & Society, 12(4), 293–300. doi:10.1080/13698571003789732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppo, A., Hecksher, D., & Tryggvesson, K. (2014). Why take chances? Advice on alcohol intake to pregnant and non-pregnant women in four Nordic countries. Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 512–529. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.957659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1997). Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 373–381. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00353-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999a). Risk. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (Ed.). (1999b). Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2012). ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.657612
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, T. (2014). Changing childbirth oral history seminar transcript (17 October 2013). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (2005). Making sense of motherhood: A narrative approach (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., & McClean, S. (2014). Pregnancy, risk perception and use of complementary and alternative medicine. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 101–116. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.867014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCT/RCM/RCOG. (2007). Making normal birth a reality: Consensus statement from the maternity care working party. NCT/RCM/RCOG. Retrieved from http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/JointStatmentNormalBirth2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., Zinn, J. O., Griffin, G., Nygren, K. G., Cebulla, A., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2014). The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: Intersectional risk theory. Health, Risk & Society, 16(5), 417–430. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.942258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew, M. J., Homer, C. S. E., Downe, S., McFadden, A., Muir, N., Prentice, T., & ten Hoope-Bender, P. (2014). An executive summary for the lancet’s series “midwifery.” Lancet. Retrieved from http://download.thelancet.com/flatcontentassets/series/midwifery/midwifery_exec_summ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, E. H., & Turner, B. S. (2001). Sexual, intimate or reproductive citizenship? Citizenship Studies. doi:10.1080/13621020120085289
   Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Stewart, M. (2014). Time, risk and midwife practice: The vaginal examination. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 84–100. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.874549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengel, C. (2014). The risk of being “too honest”: Drug use, stigma and pregnancy. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 36–50. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.868408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loon, J. (2002). Risk and technological culture: Towards a sociology of virulence. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Loon, J. (2014). Remediating risk as matter–energy–information flows of avian influenza and BSE. Health, Risk & Society, 16(5), 444–458. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.936833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggington, B., & Lafrance, M. N. (2014). ‘I think he is immune to all the smoke I gave him’: How women account for the harm of smoking during pregnancy. Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 530–546. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.951317
   Google Scholar