Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption

References

• Ackerman, L. (2013). Mobile health and fitness applications and information privacy. San Diego, CA: Privacy Rights Clearing House.
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Jeangros, C. (2011). Surveillance of risks in everyday life: The agency of pregnant women and its limitations. Social Theory & Health, 9(4), 419–436. doi:10.1057/sth.2011.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K. (2014). Risk in pregnancy and birth: Are we talking to ourselves? Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 481–493. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.957262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declercq, E., Sakala, C., Corry, M., Applebaum, S., & Herrlich, A. (2013). Listening to mothers III: Pregnancy and birth. New York: Childbirth Connection.
   Google Scholar
• Dembosky, A. (2013, July 17 2014). Pregnancy apps raise fresh privacy concerns. The Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1c560432-2782-11e3-ae16-00144feab7de.html#axzz37gHqmHO7
   Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, E., & Dancey, D. (2013). Smartphone medical applications for women’s health: What is the evidence-base and feedback? International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/782074
   Google Scholar
• Dickerman, C., Christensen, J., & Kerl-McClain, S. B. (2008). Big breasts and bad guys: Depictions of gender and race in video games. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(1), 20–29. doi:10.1080/15401380801995076
   Google Scholar
• Doty, J. L., & Dworkin, J. (2014). Online social support for parents: A critical review. Marriage & Family Review, 50(2), 174–198. doi:10.1080/01494929.2013.834027
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 357–378). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frissen, V., Lammes, S., De Lange, M., De Mul, J., & Raessens, J. (Eds). (2015). Playful identities: The ludification of digital media cultures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, L., Miller, M., & Fletcher, A. (2013). Online healthy lifestyle support in the perinatal period: What do women want and do they use it? Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(4), 313–318. doi:10.1071/PY13039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, L., Miller, M., & Lester, L. (2014). Reaching perinatal women online: The healthy you, healthy baby website and app. Journal of Obesity. doi:10.1155/2014/573928
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. (2005). On ‘risk work’: Professional discourse, accountability, and everyday action. Health, Risk & Society, 7(3), 293–307. doi:10.1080/13698570500229820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckvale, K., Prieto, J., Tilney, M., Benghozi, P.-J., & Car, J. (2015). Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: A cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Medicine, 13(1). Retrieved September 6, 2015, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahns, R.-G. (2014, September 16) The 8 drivers and barriers that will shape the mHealth app market in the next 5 years. research2guidance. Retrieved from http://mhealtheconomics.com/the-8-drivers-and-barriers-that-will-shape-the-mhealth-app-market-in-the-next-5-years/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2014). “Maternal devices”, social media and the self-management of pregnancy, mothering and child health. Societies, 4(2), 330–350. doi:10.3390/soc4020330
   Google Scholar
• Kraschnewski, L. J., Chuang, H. C., Poole, S. E., Peyton, T., Blubaugh, I., Pauli, J., & Reddy, M. (2014). Paging “Dr. Google”: Does technology fill the gap created by the prenatal care visit structure? Qualitative focus group study with pregnant women. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6), e147. Retrieved from http://www.jmir.org/2014/6/e147/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, C. (2010). On a trip to the womb: Biotourist metaphors in fetal ultrasound imaging. Women’s Studies in Communication, 33(2), 138–153. doi:10.1080/07491409.2010.507577
   Google Scholar
• Landsman, G. (2009). Reconstructing motherhood and disability in the age of ‘perfect’ babies: Lives of mothers and infants and toddlers with disabilities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littler, J. (2013). The rise of the ‘yummy mummy’: Popular conservatism and the neoliberal maternal in contemporary British culture. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(2), 227–243. doi:10.1111/cccr.2013.6.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. (2000). Corporeographies’ of pregnancy: ‘bikini babes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(4), 453–472. doi:10.1068/d234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. (2005). Maternities: Gender, bodies and space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2012). ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3), 329–340. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.657612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). The social worlds of the unborn. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2014a). Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1344–1359. doi:10.1111/soc4.12226
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2014b). Apps as artefacts: Towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. Societies, 4(4), 606–622. doi:10.3390/soc4040606
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015a). Health promotion in the digital era: A critical commentary. Health Promotion International, 30(1), 174–183. doi:10.1093/heapro/dau091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015b). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., & Jutel, A. (2015). ‘It’s like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 128–135. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., & Thomas, G. M. (2015). Playing pregnancy: The ludification and gamification of expectant motherhood in smartphone apps. M/C Journal, 18(5). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/1012
   Google Scholar
• Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). (2014). Medical device stand-alone software including apps. London: The Stationery Office (TSO).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. (2001). Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. M., & Georges, E. (1997). Cross-cultural cyborgs: Greek and Canadian women’s discourses on fetal ultrasound. Feminist Studies, 23(2), 373–401. doi:10.2307/3178405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. (2013). Making ‘postmodern’ mothers: Pregnant embodiment, baby bumps and body image. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Neiterman, E. (2012). Doing pregnancy: Pregnant embodiment as performance. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35(5), 372–383. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Higgins, A., Murphy, O. C., Egan, A., Mullaney, L., Sheehan, S., & Turner, M. J. (2014). The use of digital media by women using the maternity services in a developed country. Irish Medical Journal, 107(10), 313–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peyton, T., Poole, E., Reddy, M., Kraschnewski, J., & Chuang, C. (2014). Every pregnancy is different: Designing mHealth for the pregnancy ecology. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 577–586.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2014). Understanding digital health as public pedagogy: A critical framework. Societies, 4(2), 296–315. Retrieved from http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/2/296
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, F., & Jones, C. (2014). Women’s engagement with mobile device applications in pregnancy and childbirth. The Practising Midwife, 17(1), 23–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodger, D., Skuse, A., Wilmore, M., Humphreys, S., Dalton, J., Flabouris, M., & Clifton, V. L. (2013). Pregnant women’s use of information and communications technologies to access pregnancy-related health information in South Australia. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(4), 308–312. doi:10.1071/PY13029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhl, L. (1999). Liberal governance and prenatal care: Risk and regulation in pregnancy. Economy and Society, 28(1), 95–117. doi:10.1080/03085149900000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K., Gome, G., Richards, D., & Caldwell, P. H. Y. (2015). How trustworthy are apps for maternal and child health? Health and Technology, 4(4), 329–336. doi:10.1007/s12553-015-0099-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneviratne, S., Seneviratne, A., Mohapatra, P., & Mahanti, A. (2015). Your installed apps reveal your gender and more! Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 18(3), 55–61. doi:10.1145/2721896
   Google Scholar
• Statista. (2015a, June 26). Cumulative number of apps downloaded from the Apple App Store from July 2008 to June 2015 (in billions). Statista Inc. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/263794/number-of-downloads-from-the-apple-app-store/
   Google Scholar
• Statista. (2015b, June 26). Number of apps available in leading app stores as of May 2015. Statista Inc. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/276623/number-of-apps-available-in-leading-app-stores/.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J.-A. (2010). Mothering, guilt and shame. Sociology Compass, 4, 310–321. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1751-9020
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2008). The public life of the fetal sonogram: Technology, consumption and the politics of reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornham, H. (2008). It’s a boy thing. Feminist Media Studies, 8(2), 127–142. doi:10.1080/14680770801980505
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, N., Hainey, K., Liu, A., Poulton, A., Peek, M., Kim, J., & Nanan, R. (2014). An emerging model of maternity care: Smartphone, midwife, doctor? Women and Birth, 27(1), 64–67. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S., & Brewis, J. (2004). Matter over mind? Examining the experience of pregnancy. Sociology, 38(2), 219–236. doi:10.1177/0038038504040860
   Google Scholar
• Weir, L. (2006). Pregnancy, risk, and biopolitics: On the threshold of the living subject. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yetisen, A. K., Martinez-Hurtado, J., da Cruz Vasconcellos, F., Simsekler, M. C. E., Akram, M. S., & Lowe, C. R. (2014). The regulation of mobile medical applications. Lab on a Chip, 14(5), 833–840. doi:10.1039/c3lc51235e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar