Risk resistance: constructing home birth as morally responsible on an online discussion group

References

• Akrich, M., Leane, M., Roberts, C., & Nunes, J. A. (2014). Practising childbirth activism: A politics of evidence. BioSocieties, 9(2), 129–152. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2014.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, N. Å. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. M. (2010). Home birth matters – For all women. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 19(1), 8–11. doi:10.1624/105812410X482329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attard, A., & Coulson, N. S. (2012). A thematic analysis of patient communication in Parkinson’s disease online support group discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 500–506. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (1999). Research in midwifery – The relevance of a feminist theoretical framework. Australian College of Midwives Incorporated Journal, 12(2), 6–10. doi:10.1016/S1031-170X(99)80013-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bisits, A. A. (2016). Risk in obstetrics - Perspectives and reflections. Midwifery, 38, 12–13. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelke, M., Martinsson, A.-K., Lendahls, L., & Oscarsson, M. (2016). Using the Internet as a source of information during pregnancy: A descriptive cross-sectional study in Sweden. Midwifery, 40, 187–191. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, D., Bennett, C., McFarlin, B., & Freeze, R. (2009). Staying home to give birth: Why women in the United States choose home birth. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 54(2), 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brailey, S., Jarrett, P., Luyben, A., & Poat, A. (2015). Swimming against the tide: Women’s experience of choosing a homebirth in Switzerland. British Journal of Midwifery, 23(11), 780–788. doi:10.12968/bjom.2015.23.11.780
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society (2013). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. In INF2006/1.2013 (Ed.). Leicester: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public%20files/inf206-guidelines-for-internet-mediated-research.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brocklehurst, P., Hardy, P., Hollowell, J., Linsell, L., Macfarlane, A., McCourt, C., … Stewart, M. (2011). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 343(7840), d7400. doi:10.1136/bmj.d7400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick, M. L. (2016). Home birth: The wholeness of absence. Health Communication, 31(3), 379–381. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.950928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Shoveller, J., Chabot, C., & LaMontagne, A. D. (2013). Risk, resistance and the neoliberal agenda: Young people, health and well-being in the UK, Canada and Australia. Health, Risk & Society, 15(4), 333–346. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.796346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caron-Flinterman, J. F., Broerse, J. E. W., & Bunders, J. F. G. (2005). The experiential knowledge of patients: A new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2575–2584. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. J., & Foster, D. (2014). Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 68–83. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.86385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, G. (2006). British maternal mortality in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(11), 559–563. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.11.559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheyney, M. J. (2008). Homebirth as systems-challenging praxis: Knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qualitative Health Research, 18(2), 254–267. doi:10.1177/1049732307312393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. H., & Raymond, J. M. (2011). How the Internet is giving birth (to) a new social order. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 937–957. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.582132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. doi:10.1111/jcom.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. (1994). Wellness as virtue: Morality and the pursuit of health. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 18(3), 385–401. doi:10.1007/BF01379232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K. (2014). Risk in pregnancy and birth: Are we talking to ourselves? Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 481–493. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.957262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Chisholm, A., Malouf, R., Rowe, R., & Hollowell, J. (2017). What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(103). doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Sandall, J., & Fulop, N. J. (2014). To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 51–67. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.859231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Risk, pregnancy and childbirth: What do we currently know and what do we need to know? An editorial. Health, Risk & Society, 14(6), 503–510. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.709486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H. G., & Homer, C. S. E. (2013). ‘Motherbirth or childbirth’? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery, 29(2), 167–173. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. E. (2004). Birth as an American rite of passage (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Crespigny, L., & Savulescu, J. (2014). Homebirth and the future child. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(12), 807–812. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. (R. Hurley, Trans.) New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought (pp. 32–50). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1987). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality, Vol. 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). On the government of the living. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. The essential works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 1 (pp. 81–85). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsdottir, H. K., & Benner, B. E. (2014). ‘Knowledge is power’: Risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 7–21. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.866216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2016). Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification”. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 80–108. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, B. W., O’Connell, M., Augustson, E. M., Wen-Ying, S. C., Shaikh, A. R., & Finney, R. L. J. (2011). Realizing the promise of Web 2.0: Engaging community intelligence. Journal of Health Communication, 16(Sup1), 10–31. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.589882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliman, R. (2011). Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of ‘climategate’ for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism, 12(7), 832–846. doi:10.1177/1464884911412707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holten, L., & De Miranda, E. (2016). Women’s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: An exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system’. Midwifery, 38, 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H. (2012). Discourse analysis: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katz Rothman, B. (2014). Pregnancy, birth and risk: An introduction. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.876191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. G. E. (2009). The political philosophy of Michel Foucault. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kouper, I. (2010). The pragmatics of peer advice in a Live Journal community. Language@Internet, 7, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Leap, N. (2009). Woman-centred or women-centred care: Does it matter? British Journal of Midwifery, 17(1), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Macvarish, J., & Bristow, J. (2010). Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk & Society, 12(4), 293–300. doi:10.1080/13698571003789732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., Lee, E., & Macvarish, J. (2015). Growing better brains? Pregnancy and neuroscience discourses in English social and welfare policies. Health, Risk & Society, 17(1), 15–29. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.994479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk: A sociological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999a). Risk. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999b). Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 59–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). The social worlds of the unborn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., & Tulloch, J. (2002). ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), 113–124. doi:10.1080/13698570220137015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacrida, C., & Boulton, T. (2012). Women’s perceptions of childbirth “choices”: Competing discourses of motherhood, sexuality and selflessness. Gender and Society, 26(5), 748–772. doi:10.1177/0891243212452630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J., Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2004). Management consultant talk: A cross-cultural comparison of normalizing discourse and resistance. Organization, 11(4), 539–564. doi:10.1177/1350508404044061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Centre for Health Statistics (2014). Trends in out-of-hospital births in the United States, 1990–2012. Retrieved November 06, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db144.htm
   Google Scholar
• NICE. (2014). Intrapartum care: Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Clinical guideline 190 – Methods, evidence and recommendations. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health.
   Google Scholar
• NVivo. (2015). QSR International Pty Ltd (Version 11.1.0).
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2015). Statistical bulletin: Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2014. Retrieved October 08, 2015, from http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2015-10-08
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovska, K., Watts, N., Sheehan, A., Bisits, A., & Homer, C. (2017). How do social discourses of risk and danger influence women’s choices for vaginal breech birth? A qualitative study of women’s experiences. Health, Risk & Society, 19(1–2), 19–37. doi:10.1080/13698575.2016.1256378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, Á., Shan, L., McConnon, Á., Marcu, A., Raats, M., Wall, P., & Barnett, J. (2014). Strategies for dismissing dietary risks: Insights from user-generated comments online. Health, Risk & Society, 16(4), 308–322. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.919993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1986). Foucault and the imagination of power. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 149–156). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, Risk & Society, 14(2), 207–221. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.661041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communciation: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, S. (2010). Homebirth advocacy on the Internet. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(1), 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, I., Nordström, B., & Edberg, A.-K. (2006). A qualitative study of women’s experiences of home birth in Sweden. Midwifery, 22(4), 348–355. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2005.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striley, K., & Field-Springer, K. (2016). When it’s good to be a bad nurse: Expanding risk orders theory to explore nurses’ experiences of moral, social and identity risks in obstetrics units. Health, Risk & Society, 18(1–2), 77–96. doi:10.1080/13698575.2016.1169254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2000). Risk and welfare. In P. Taylor-Gooby (Ed.), Risk, trust and welfare (pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Viisainen, K. (2000). The moral dangers of home birth: Parents’ perceptions of risks in home birth in Finland. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(6), 792–814. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2002). Essential antenatal, perinatal and postpartum care: Training modules. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/131521/E79235.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zielinski, R., Ackerson, K., & Low, L. K. (2015). Planned home birth: Benefits, risks, and opportunities. International Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 361–377. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S55561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar