‘You don’t know what’s going on in there’: a discursive analysis of midwifery hospital consultations

References

• Adolfsson, A., Larsson, P. G., Wijma, B., & Bertero, C. (2004). Guilt and emptiness: Women’s experiences of miscarriage. Health Care for Women International, 25(6), 543–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alaszewski, A. (2009). Information about health risks. In B. Heyman, M. Shaw, A. Alaszewski, & M. Titterton (Eds.), Risk, safety and clinical practice: Healthcare through the lens of risk (pp. 123–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569008.003.06
   Google Scholar
• Australian College of Midwives. (2016). Midwifery philosophy. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from https://www.midwives.org.au/midwifery-philosophy
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, C., Zadoroznyj, M., Hallgrimsdottir, H., Treloar, A., & Taylor, K. (2010). Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 71(3), 475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaaka, G., & Schauer Eri, T. (2008). Doing midwifery between different belief systems. Midwifery, 24(3), 344–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). Sussex: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. K. (2010). Beyond control: Body and self in women’s childbearing narratives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(7), 993–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. J., & Foster, D. (2013). Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, F., Dahlen, H. G., & Homer, C. S. E. (2014). Conflicting contexts: Midwives’ interpretation of childbirth through photo elicitation. Women and Birth, 27(2), 126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Sandall, J., & Fulop, N. J. (2014). To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. (2004). Risk ritual and the management of control and anxiety in medical culture. Health: an Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 8(4), 505–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darra, S., & Murphy, F. (2016). Coping and help in birth: An investigation into “normal” childbirth as described by new mothers and their attending midwives. Midwifery, 40, 18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75(S1), S5–S23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georges, E. (1997). Fetal ultrasound imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge in Greece. In R. Davis-Floyd & C. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 91–112). Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, D. (2000). Normal labour: A concept analysis. Journal of Advance Nursing, 31(2), 418–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsdottir, H. K., & Benner, B. E. (2014). “Knowledge is power”: Risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, S., Humphreys, E., & Kennedy, C. (2016). Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women and Birth, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, B. (2009a). The concept of risk. In B. Heyman, M. Shaw, A. Alaszewski, & M. Titterton (Eds.), Risk, safety and clinical practice: Healthcare through the lens of risk (pp. 15–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569008.003.01
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, B. (2009b). The social construction of health risks. In B. Heyman, M. Shaw, A. Alaszewski, & M. Titterton (Eds.), Risk, safety and clinical practice: Healthcare through the lens of risk (pp. 37–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569008.003.02
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, C. (2005). Re-birthing: Report of the review of maternity services in Queensland. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, R., Newburn, M., & Macfarlane, A. (2002). Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 324(7342), 892–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. P. (2010). The problem of normal birth. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 55(3), 199–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999). Risk: Key ideas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2012). “Precious cargo”: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3), 329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (Vol. 1 pp. 59). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie Bryers, H., & van Teijlingen, E. (2010). Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery, 26(5), 488–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markens, S., Browner, C. H., & Mabel Preloran, H. (2010). Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(1), 37–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthias, M. S. (2010). The impact of uncertainty on decision making in prenatal consultations: Obstetricians’ and midwives’ perspectives. Health Communication, 25(3), 199–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuter, R. F., Gallois, C., Segalowitz, N. S., Ryder, A. G., & Hocking, J. (2015). Overcoming language barriers in healthcare: A protocol for investigating safe and effective communication when patients or clinicians use a second language. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Queensland Government. (2012). Pregnancy health record. Retrieved from: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/…/pregancy_rec.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. J. (2015). “I think it’s self-preservation”: Risk perception and secrecy in early pregnancy. Health, Risk & Society, 17(5–6), 329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall, J., Hatem, M., Devane, D., Soltani, H., & Gates, S. (2009). Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: Continuity, normality and safety. Midwifery, 25(1), 8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M. (2011). The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: A tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(7), 987–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M. (2016). The fear factor of risk – Clinical governance and midwifery talk and practice in the UK. Midwifery, 38, 14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, Risk & Society, 14(2), 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. S., Doucerain, M. M., Meuter, R. F., Zhao, Y., Hocking, J., & Ryder, A. G. (2016). Comprehending adverbs of doubt and certainty in health communication: A multidimensional scaling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, C., Licqurish, S., Rolls, C., & Hopkins, F. (2010). “Lending the space”: Midwives perceptions of birth space and clinical risk management. Midwifery, 26(5), 526–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wagner, V. (2016). Risk talk: Using evidence without increasing fear. Midwifery, 38, 21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 9(3), 335–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2000). A discourse-dynamic approach to the study of subjectivity in health psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 547–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1996). Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
   Google Scholar