Health condition and risk attitude in the Dutch population: an exploratory approach

References

• Alaszewski, A., & Burgess, A. (2007). Risk, time and reason. Health, Risk & Society, 9(4), 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Jilke, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2014). Economic strain and perceptions of social cohesion in Europe: Does institutional trust matter? European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 559–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apouey, B, & Clark, A. E. (2015). Winning big but feeling no better? the effect of lottery prizes on physical and mental health. Health Economics, 24(5), 516–538. doi: 10.1002/hec.v24.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 84(2), 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Bansback, N., Harrison, M., Sadatsafavi, M., Stiggelbout, A., & Whitehurst, D. G. T. (2016). Attitude to health risk in the Canadian population: A cross-sectional survey. CMAJ Open, 4(2), E284–E291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beauchamp, J., Cesarini, D., & Johannesson, M. (2015). The psychometric and empirical properties of measures of risk preferences. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2614973
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., & Lutter, M. (2012). Why the poor play the lottery: Sociological approaches to explaining class-based lottery play. Sociology, 47(6), 1152–1170.
   Google Scholar
• Bellante, D., & Green, C. A. (2004). Relative risk aversion among the elderly. Review of Financial Economics, 13, 269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsang, E., & Dohmen, T. (2015). Risk attitude and cognitive aging. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 112, 112–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 1171–1178. doi:10.2307/2532457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83(1), 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 87, 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Scribner, R., & Farley, T. (2000). A structural model of health behavior: A pragmatic approach to explain and influence health behaviors at the population level. Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 146–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X., Hartog, J., & Sun, Y. (2010). Can we measure individual risk attitudes in a survey? Iza, (4807), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitude: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkers, B., Melenberg, B., & Van Soest, A. (2001). Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: A large sample approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22(2), 165–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T. A. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2(2), 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohlich, K. L., & Potvin, L. (2008). Transcending the known in public health practice: The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galizzi, M. M., Miraldo, M., & Stavropoulou, C. (2016). In sickness but not in wealth: Field evidence on patients risk preferences in financial and health domains. Medical Decision Making, 36(4), 503–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, S., & Goldstein, I. (2007). The positive effects of biased self-perceptions in firms. Review of Finance, 11(3), 453–496.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, S., Heaton, J. B., & Odean, T. (2011). Overconfidence, compensation contracts, and capital budgeting. Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1735–1777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., Vesely, S., & Chang, M.-H. (2000). Health risk aversion, health risk affinity, and socio-economic position in the USA: The demographics of multiple risk. Health, Risk & Society, 2(3), 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanoch, Y., Johnson, J. G., & Wilke, A. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment: An application to risk-taking behavior. Psychological Science, 17(4), 300–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, J., & Hilbe, J. (2012). Generalized linear models and extensions (3rd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, B. (2013). Health care through the “lens of risk”: Reflections on the recent series of four special issues. Health, Risk & Society, 15(8), 615–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauriola, M., Russo, P. M., Lucidi, F., Violani, C., & Levin, I. P. (2005). The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 45–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., … Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 8(2), 75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a Just World. In The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion (pp. 9–30). Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Lönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitz, G., & Wichardt, P. C. (2015). Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 119, 254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, W. G., Basu, A., & Mullahy, J. (2005). Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. Journal of Health Economics, 24(3), 465–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Fernández, J., Ariza-Cardiel, G., Polentinos-Castro, E., Gil-Lacruz, I., Gómez-Gascón, T., & Domínguez-Bidagor, J. (2016). Risk-taking attitudes of people who seek health care : An exploratory approach through lottery games using generalized estimating equations. Revista Española De Salud Publica, 90, e1–e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 42, 109–142.
   Google Scholar
• Nobre, L. H. N., Grable, J. E., Da Silva, W. V., & Da Veiga, C. P. (2016). A cross cultural test of financial risk tolerance attitudes: Brazilian and American similarities and differences. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 314–322.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Trust in government. In Government at a glance (pp. 158–160). Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/gov_glance-2015-50-en.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., & Hong, J. H. (2012). Citizens’ trust in government and their willingness-to-pay. Economics Letters, 115(3), 345–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., & Rashid, S. (2011). The white (male) effect and risk perception: Can equality make a difference? Risk Analysis, 31(6), 1016–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlke, J., Strasser, S., & Vieider, F. M. (2015). Responsibility effects in decision making under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(2), 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. L. (2007). Affect and financial decision-making: How neuroscience can inform market participants. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(2), 70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B., & Gibson, R. (1992). Risk perception. In The Royal Society (Ed.), Risk: Analysis, perception and management (pp. 89–134). London: Report of a Royal Society Study Group.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2008). Concepts of risk : An interdisciplinary review. part 1: Disciplinary risk concepts. Gaia Ecological Perspectives For Science And Society, 17(1), 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, A. B., Tsai, J. S., & Downs, S. M. (2003). Variations in risk attitude across race, gender, and education. Medical Decision Making, 23(6), 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. S., & Wu, S. (2004). Portfolio choice and health status. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(3), 457–484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (1998). Trust and Sociability. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(4), 391–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., & Earle, T. C. (2005). Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. E., & Keeney, R. L. (2005). Your money or your life: A prescriptive model for health, safety, and consumption decisions. Management Science, 51(9), 1309–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2006). Trust, risk and health care reform. Health, Risk & Society, 8(2), 97–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teppa, F., & Vis, C. (2012). The CentERpanel and the DNB household survey: Methodological aspects. Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department .
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valois, R. F, Kerr, J. C, Hennessy, M, DiClemente, R. J, Brown, L. K, Carey, M. P, & Romer, D. (2015). Perceived Difficulty Of Performing Selected Hiv/aids Preventive Behaviors and Life Satisfaction: Is There a Relationship for African American Adolescents? Aids and Behavior, 19(7), 1288–1297. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0900-2
   Google Scholar
• Von Rosenbladt, B., & Stocker, A. (2005). Testerhebung zum SOEP 2006 “Persönlichkeit und Alltag”, Verhaltensexperimente, Retest-Studie. 2014 December 1. Retrieved from http://www.diw.de/documents/dokumentenarchiv/17/diw_01.c.44447.de/meth_2006_re.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warshawsky-Livne, L., A’wad, F., Shkolnik-Inbar, J., & Pliskin, J. S. (2012). A note on the relationship between health-risk attitude and monetary-risk attitude. Health, Risk & Society, 14(4), 377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, R., & Hanna, S. D. (2005). The effect of gender and marital status on financial risk tolerance. Journal of Personal Finance, 4(1), 66–85.
   Google Scholar
• Zanin, L. (2017). Education and life satisfaction in relation to the probability of social trust: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 925–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2008). Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health, Risk & Society, 10(5), 439–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2015). Towards a better understanding of risk-taking: Key concepts, dimensions and perspectives. Health, Risk & Society, 17(2), 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar