Conceiving of risk in childbirth: obstetric discourses, medical management and cultural expectations in Switzerland and Jordan

References

• Abushaikha, L. (2007). Methods of coping with labour pain used jordanian women. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 18(1), 35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abushaikha, L., & Oweis, A. (2005). Labour pain experience and intensity: A Jordanian perspective. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 11(1), 33–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alaszewski, A., & Brown, P. (2007). Risk, uncertainty and knowledge. Health, Risk & Society, 9(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaszewski, P. A., & Burgess, A. (2007). Risk, time and reason. Health, Risk & Society, 9(4), 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D. R. (2002). Managing motherhood, managing risk: Fertility and danger in West Central Tanzania. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alzyoud, F., Khoshnood, K., Alnatour, A., & Oweis, A. (2018). Exposure to verbal abuse and neglect during childbirth among Jordanian women. Midwifery, 58, 71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadouny, V. (1994). Infrastructural development under the British Mandate. In E. Rogan & T. Tell (Eds.), Village, steppe and state: The social origins of modern Jordan (pp. 128–161). London: British Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. (1995). The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness, 17(3), 393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, L., Kornelsen, J., Longman, J., Robin, S., Kruske, S., Kildea, S., & Morgan, G. (2016). Reconceptualising risk: Perceptions of risk in rural and remote maternity service planning. Midwifery, 38, 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisits, A. (2016). Risk in obstetrics – Perspectives and reflections. Midwifery, 38, 12–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan-Lovis, E., & De Vries, R. G. (2014). The baddest births in town. Atrium, 12(4), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. (2003). The cultural nature of risk: Can there be an anthropology of uncertainty? Ethnos, 68(2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brailey, S., Jarrett, P., Luyben, A., & Poat, A. (2015). Swimming against the tide: Women’s experience of choosing a homebirth in Switzerland. British Journal of Midwifery, 23(11), 780–788.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., Porter, M., Tracy, S. K., & Sullivan, E. A. (2007). Caesarean birth: Consumption, safety, order, and good mothering. Social Science & Medicine, 65(6), 1192–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton-Jeangros, C., Cavalli, S., Gouilhers, S., & Hammer, R. (2013). Between tolerable uncertainty and unacceptable risks: How health professionals and pregnant women think about the probabilities generated by prenatal screening. Health, Risk & Society, 15(2), 144–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carricaburu, D. (2007). De l’incertitude de la naissance au risque obstétrical: Les enjeux d’une définition. Sociologie Et Sociétés, 39(1), 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Caton, D. (1999). What a blessing she had chloroform: The medical and social response to the pain of childbirth from 1800 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. J., & Foster, D. (2014). Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. (2006). Worst cases: Terror and catastrophe in the popular imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. (2008). Thinking about Worst-Case Thinking. Sociological Inquiry, 78(2), 154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K. (2014). Risk in pregnancy and birth: Are we talking to ourselves? Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 481–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Homer, C., Bisits, A., Sandall, J., & Bick, D. (2016). Reconceptualising risk in childbirth. Midwifery, 38, 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Risk, pregnancy and childbirth: What do we currently know and what do we need to know? An editorial. Health, Risk & Society, 14(6), 503–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csordas, T. J. (1993). Somatic modes of attention. Cultural Anthropology, 8(2), 135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H. (2016). The politicisation of risk. Midwifery, 38, 6–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75(Supplement 1), S5–S23.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2003). Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Bel-Air, F. (2013). Mariage tardif et célibat au Moyen-Orient: Quels enjeux? In B. Drieskens (Ed.), Les métamorphoses du mariage au Moyen-Orient (pp. 119–150). Beyrouth: Presses de l’Ifpo.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, C. (1991). The seed and the soil: Gender and cosmology in Turkish village society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, N. (2015). Engaging with risk in non-Western settings: An editorial. Health, Risk & Society, 17(3–4), 196–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, H. (2003). The place of birth: Childbearing and kinship in Calcutta middle-class families. Medical Anthropology, 22(4), 303–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavski, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favre, A. (2009). Moi, Adeline, accoucheuse. Sierre; Lausanne: Monographic.
   Google Scholar
• Faya Robles, A. (2019). Health regulations and social experiences of ‘high-risk’ pregnancies among young working-class women in Brazil. Health, Risk & Society, In this volume.
   Google Scholar
• Ferndale, D., Meuter, R. F., Watson, B., & Gallois, C. (2017). ‘You don’t know what’s going on in there’: A discursive analysis of midwifery hospital consultations. Health, Risk & Society, 19(7–8), 411–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (2000). Medical uncertainty revisited. In G. L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, & S. C. Scrimshaw (Eds.), The handbook of social studies in health and medicine (pp. 409–425). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• FSO, Swiss Federal Statistical Office. (2013). 2010 European Perinatal health Report. Switzerland average overall with a few exceptions. Retrieved from: https://www.europeristat.com/images/PR_Switzerland_english.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FSO, Swiss Federal Statistical Office. (2016). La santé reproductive. Retrieved from: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/sante/etat-sante/reproductive.html
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In A. Giddens, U. Beck, & L. Scott (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Good, B. J. (1994). Medicine, rationality, and experience: An anthropological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gouilhers-Hertig, S. (2014). Vers une culture du risque personnalisée. Choisir d’accoucher à domicile ou en maison de naissance en Suisse. Socio-Anthropologie, 29, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Gouilhers-Hertig, S. (2017). Gouverner par le risque : Une ethnographie comparée des lieux d’accouchement en Suisse romande (Thèse de doctorat en sociologie). Université de Genève, Genève.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsdottir, H. K., & Benner, B. E. (2014). ‘Knowledge is power’: Risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, R., & Burton-Jeangros, C. (2013). Tensions around risks in pregnancy: A typology of women’s experiences of surveillance medicine. Social Science & Medicine, (93), 55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, R., & Inglin, S. (2014). ‘I don’t think it’s risky, but … ’: Pregnant women’s risk perceptions of maternal drinking and smoking. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 22–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanselmann, V., & von Greyerz, S. (2013). Accouchements par césarienne en Suisse. Rapport en réponse au postulat Maury Pasquier (08.3935). Berne: Office fédéral de la santé publique.
   Google Scholar
• Hatamleh, R., Shaban, I. A., & Homer, C. (2013). Evaluating the experience of Jordanian women with maternity care services. Health Care for Women International, 34(6), 499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helén, I. (2002). Risk and anxiety: Polyvalence of ethics in high-tech antenatal care. Critical Public Health, 12(2), 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, B. (2009). Values and health risks. In B. Heyman, M. Shaw, A. Alaszewski, & M. Titterton (Eds.), Risk, safety and clinical practice health care through the lens of risk (pp. 59–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, B. (2013). Health care through the ‘lens of risk’: Reflections on the recent series of four special issues. Health, Risk & Society, 15(8), 615–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, B., Alaszewski, A., Shaw, M., & Titterton, M. (2009). Risk, safety and clinical practice: Health care through the lens of risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, B., Hundt, G., Sandall, J., Spencer, K., Williams, C., Grellier, R., & Pitson, L. (2006). On being at higher risk: A qualitative study of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies. Social Science & Medicine, 62(10), 2360–2372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1978). Birth in four cultures: A crosscultural investigation of childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. Prospects Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufert, P., & O’Neil, J. (1993). Analysis of a dialogue on risks in childbirth: Clinicians, epidemiologists, and Inuit women. In S. Lindenbaum & M. M. Lock (Eds.), Knowledge, power, and practice: The anthropology of medicine and everyday life (pp. 32–54). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufert, P., & O’Neil, J. (1990). Cooptation and control: The reconstruction of inuit birth. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 4(4), 427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khresheh, R., Homer, C., & Barclay, L. (2009). A comparison of labour and birth outcomes in Jordan with WHO guidelines: A descriptive study using a new birth record. Midwifery, 25(6), e11–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildea, S. (2006). Risky business: Contested knowledge over safe birthing services for Aboriginal women. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 387–396.
   Google Scholar
• Kukla, R. (2010). The ethics and cultural politics of reproductive risk warnings: A case study of California’s Proposition 65. Health, Risk & Society, 12(4), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (1995). The medical model of the body as a site of risk : A case study of childbirth. In J. Gabe (Ed.), Medicine, health and risk: Sociological approaches (pp. 53–72). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2015). Pluralist risk cultures: The sociology of childbirth in Vanuatu. Health, Risk & Society, 17(5–6), 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankshear, G., Ettorre, E., & Mason, D. (2005). Decision-making, uncertainty and risk: Exploring the complexity of work processes in NHS delivery suites. Health, Risk & Society, 7(4), 361–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, S. R., & Norwitz, E. R. (2009). Ethics and “Cesarean delivery on maternal demand.” Seminars in Perinatology, 33(6), 405–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Macvarish, J., & Bristow, J. (2010). Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk & Society, 12(4), 293–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1993). Risk as moral danger: The social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. International Journal of Health Services, 23(3), 425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2011). ‘The best thing for the baby’: Mothers’ concepts and experiences related to promoting their infants’ health and development. Health, Risk & Society, 13(7–8), 637–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2012a). Medicine as culture: Illness, disease and the body. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2012b). “Precious cargo”: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3), 329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). Risk. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maffi, I. (2012a). Géographie du corps féminin et pratiques de la naissance en Jordanie. Une ethnographie du milieu obstétrical. Genre, Sexualité Et Société, 8, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Maffi, I. (2012b). L’accouchement est-il un événement? Regards croisés sur les définitions médicales et les expériences intimes des femmes en Jordanie et en Suisse. Mondes Contemporains, (2), 53–80.
   Google Scholar
• Maffi, I. (2012c). Women, health and the state in the middle east: The politics and culture of childbirth in Jordan. New York: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Maffi, I. (2016). The detour of an obstetric technology: Active management of labour across cultures. Medical Anthropology, (35), 17–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (2011). Annual statistical book. Amman (Jordan): Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. M. (2001). Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, K. I. S., Shaban, I., Homer, C., & Creedy, D. (2014). Women’s satisfaction with hospital-based intrapartum care: A Jordanian study. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 6(3), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Lawless, J. (1992). Reading birth and death through obstetric practice. The Canadian Journal of Irish Studies, 18(1), 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Health at a glance 2013. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/health_glance-2013-en
   Google Scholar
• Possamai-Inesedy, A. (2006). Confining risk: Choice and responsibility in childbirth in a risk society. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 406–414.
   Google Scholar
• Reiger, K., & Dempsey, R. (2006). Performing birth in a culture of fear: An embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 364–373.
   Google Scholar
• Rifai, R. A. (2014). Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: Analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012. Global Health, Science and Practice, 2(2), 195–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudrum, S. (2017). Pregnancy and birth in the global South: A review of critical approaches to sociocultural risk illustrated with fieldwork data from northern Uganda. Health, Risk & Society, 19(1–2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, C., & Bascope, G. (1996). Ways of knowing about birth in three cultures. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 10(2), 213–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Save the Children. (2014). La situation des mères dans le monde 2014. Retrieved from: https://assets.savethechildren.ch/downloads/french_report_pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scamell, M. (2011). The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: A tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(7), 987–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M. (2014). Childbirth within the risk society. Sociology Compass, 8(7), 917–928.
   Google Scholar
• Scamell, M. (2016). The fear factor of risk – Clinical governance and midwifery talk and practice in the UK. Midwifery, 38, 14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, Risk & Society, 14(2), 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., Altaweli, R., & McCourt, C. (2017). Sarah’s birth. How the medicalisation of childbirth may be shaped in different settings: Vignette from a study of routine intervention in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Women and Birth, 30(1), e39–e45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmied, V., & Lupton, D. (2001). The externality of the inside: Body images of pregnancy. Nursing Inquiry, 8(1), 32–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaban, I. A., Hatamleh, R., Khresheh, R., & Homer, C. (2011). Childbirth practices in Jordanian public hospitals: Consistency with evidence-based maternity care? International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 9(1), 25–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner, J., & Maude, R. (2016). The tensions of uncertainty: Midwives managing risk in and of their practice. Midwifery, 38, 35–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonbol, -A. E.-A. (2003). Women of the Jordan: Islam, labor, and the law. Syracuse, N.Y: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabet, P. (1998). La construction sociale de l’inégalité des sexes: Des outils et des corps. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2000). Risk, trust and welfare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Buchbinder, M. (2010). Patients-in-waiting: Living between sickness and health in the genomics era. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(4), 408–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topçu, S. (2019). Caesarean or vaginarean epidemics? Techno-birth, risk and obstetric practice in Turkey. Health, Risk & Society, In this volume.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London [etc.]: Sage Publ.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2015). World fertility patterns, 2015. United Nations. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/fertility/world-fertility-patterns-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2014. A study on early marriage in Jordan. Amman: Author. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/mena/UNICEFJordan_EarlyMarriageStudy20141.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2015). Levels & trends in child mortality, report 2015. Author. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Child_Mortality_Report_2015_Web_8_Sept_15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Hollen, C. (2003a). Birth on the threshold: Childbirth and modernity in South India. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hollen, C. (2003b). Invoking Vali: Painful technologies of modern birth in South India. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 17(1), 49–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassy, C. (2006). From a genetic innovation to mass health programmes: The diffusion of Down’s Syndrome prenatal screening and diagnostic techniques in France. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 63(8), 2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viisainen, K. (2000). The moral dangers of home birth: Parents’ perceptions of risks in home birth in Finland. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22(6), 792–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuille, M. (1998). Accouchement et douleur: Une étude sociologique. Lausanne: Ed. Antipodes.
   Google Scholar
• Vuille, M. (2015). L’invention de l’accouchement sans douleur, France 1950-1980. Travail, Genre Et Sociétés, (34), 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1987). Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. California Management Review, XXIX, (2), 112–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (2005). Framing the fetus in medical work: Rituals and practices. Social Science & Medicine, 60(9), 2085–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C., Sandall, J., Lewando-Hundt, G., Heyman, B., Spencer, K., & Grellier, R. (2005). Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 61(9), 1983–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar