References
- Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie- ANSD. (2012). Enquête Démographique et de Santé à Indicateurs Multiples au Sénégal 2010-2011 (pp. 482 p). Dakar, Senegal: ANSD.
- Akrich, M., & Pasveer, B. (1996). Comment la naissance vient aux femmes. Les techniques de l’accouchement en France et aux Pays-Bas. Paris: Broché.
- Alaszewski, A. (2015). Anthropology and risk: Insights into uncertainty, danger and blame from other cultures. A review essay. Health, Risk & Society, 17(3–4), 205–225.
- Albrow, M., & King, E. (1990). Globalization, knowledge and society. London: Sage.
- Alkire, B. C., Vincent, J. R., Burns, C. T., Metzler, I. S., Farmer, P. E., Meara, J. G., & Dietz, H. P. (2012). Obstructed labor and caesarean delivery: The cost and benefit of surgical intervention. PLoS ONE, 7(4), 1–10.
- Aronowitz, R. (2015). Risky medicine. our quest to cure fear and uncertainty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Barker, K. K. (1998). A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalisation of pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 47(8), 1067–1076.
- Beck, U. (2003). La société du risque: Sur la voie d’une autre modernité. Paris: Flammarion.
- Bessett, D. (2010). Negotiating normalization: The perils of producing pregnancy symptoms in prenatal care. Social Science & Medicine, 71(2), 370‑377.
- Boholm, A., & Corvellec, H. (2011). A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175–190.
- Brown, P. (2015). Theorising uncertainty and risk across different modernities: Considering insights from ‘non-North-Western’ studies. Health, Risk & Society, 17(3–4), 185–195.
- Brown, P. (2016). From rationalities to lifeworlds: Analysing the everyday handling of uncertainty and risk in terms of culture, society and identity. Health, Risk & Society, 18(7–8), 335–347.
- Brown, P. (2017). Theories of uncertainty and risk across different modernities. London: Routledge.
- Bryant, J., Porter, M., Tracy, S. K., & Sullivan, E. A. (2007). Caesarean birth: Consumption, safety, order, and good mothering. Social Science & Medicine, 65(6), 1192–1201.
- Carricaburu, D. (2005). De la gestion technique du risque à celle du travail: L’accouchement en hôpital public. Sociologie Du Travail, 47(2), 245–262.
- Carricaburu, D. (2007). De l’incertitude de la naissance au risque obstétrical: Les enjeux d’une définition. Sociologie Et Sociétés, 39(1), 123–144.
- Carricaburu, D., Castra, M., & Cohen, P. (2010). Risques et pratiques médicales. Rennes: Presses de l’EHESP.
- Clarke, A., Fishman, J. R., Fosket, J. R., Mamo, L., & Shim, J. K. (2000). Technosciences et nouvelle biomédicalisation: Racines occidentales, rhizomes mondiaux. Sciences Sociales Et Santé, 18(2), 11–42.
- Davis-Floyd, R. (1992). The technocratic body and the organic body: Cultural models for women’s birth choices. The Anthropology of Science and Technology, 9, 59–93.
- Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 75(1), 5–23.
- Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). (2017). Sénégal. Enquête Démographique et de Santé Continue (EDS- Continue 2016). https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR331/FR331.pdf
- Desmond, N. (2015). Engaging with risk in non-Western settings: An editorial. Health Risk & Society, 17(3), 1–9.
- Diop, M. C. (2008). Le Sénégal des migrations. Mobilités, identités et sociétés. Paris: Karthala.
- Diouf, M. (1994). Sénégal. Les ethnies et la nation. Paris: L’Harmattan.
- Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Douglas, M. (1970). Witchcraft, confessions and accusations. London: Tavistock Publications.
- Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Duden, B. (1991). Der Frauenleib als öffentlicher Ort: Vom Missbrauch des Begriffs Leben. Hamburg/Zürich: Luchterhand.
- Duden, B. (2002). Die Gene im Kopf, der Fötus im Bauch. Historisches zum Frauenkörper. Hannover: Offizin Verlag.
- Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
- Favret-Saada, J. (1980). Deadly words: Witchcraft in the bocage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Faye, A. (2010). Facteurs déterminants le lieu d’accouchement chez des femmes ayant bénéficié au moins d’une consultation prénatale dans une structure sanitaire (Sénégal). Revue D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, 58(5), 323–329.
- Foucault, M. (1963). Naissance de la clinique: Une archéologie du regard médical. Paris: PUF.
- Gardey, D. (2013). Writing the history of the relations between medicine, gender and the body in the twentieth century: A way forward? Clio, 27, 1–22.
- Gaskin, I. M. (1977). Spiritual Midwifery. Tennessee: Book Publishing Company.
- Gouilhers-Hertig, S. (2010). Le suivi de la grossesse par les sages-femmes: Vers une ‘autonomie raisonnée’ des femmes enceintes. In D. Manaï, C. Burton-Jeangros, & B. Elger (Eds.), Risques et informations autour du suivi de la grossesse: Droit, éthique et pratiques sociales (pp. 213–243). Bern: Stämpfli.
- Illich, I. (1975). Némésis médicale. L’expropriation de la santé. Paris: Edition Seuil.
- Jacques, B. (2007). Sociologie de l’accouchement. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Jaffré, Y. (2012). Towards an anthropology of public health priorities: Maternal mortality in four obstetric emergency services in West Africa. Anthropologie Sociale, 20(1), 3–18.
- Jordan, B. (1997). Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In R. E. Davis-Floyd, C. F. Sargent, & R. Rapp (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 55–79). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Kaufmann, J. C. (1992). La Trame conjugale. Analyse du couple par son linge. Paris: Nathan.
- Kingma, E. (2014). Naturalism about heath and disease: Adding nuance for progress. The Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 39(6), 590–608.
- Knibiehler, Y. (2007). Accoucher: Femmes, sages-femmes et médecins depuis le milieu du XXe siècle. Rennes: Presses de l’ENSP.
- Lane, K. (1995). The medical model of the body as a site of risk: A case study of childbirth. In J. Gabe (Ed.), Medicine, health and risk: Sociological approaches (pp. 53–72). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Lane, K. (2015). Pluralist risk cultures: The sociology of childbirth in Vanuatu. Health, Risk & Society, 17(5–6), 349–367.
- Lazarus, E. S. (1994). What do women want? Issue of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 8(1), 25–46.
- Lupton, D. (2006). Sociology and risk. In M. Gabe & S. Walklate (Eds.), Beyond the risk society: Critical reflections on risk and human security (pp. 11–24). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Martin, E. (1987). The women in the body. A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Miller, D. (1998). Material cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Morris, T. (2013). Cut it out. The C-section epidemic in America. New York, NY: New York University Press.
- National Institute of Statistical Studies (ISTAT). (2014). Gravidanza, parto e allattamento al seno. Retrieved from http://www.istat.it/it/files/2014/12/gravidanza.pdf
- Ndeye, F. N. (2015). L’assistance médicale à l’accouchement au Sénégal (Thèse en Démographie). Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.
- Oakley, A. (1980). Women confined, toward a sociology of childbirth. London: Martin Robertson.
- Odent, M. (1984). Birth Reborn. New York, NY: Random House.
- Olivier de Sardan, J. P., & Jaffré, Y. (2003). Une médecine inhospitalière. Les difficiles relations entre soignants et soignés dans cinq capitales d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Paris: Karthala.
- Organization, World Health, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank. (2015). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015 - Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank (pp. 15). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
- Quagliariello, C. (2017). L’accouchement naturel contre l’hôpital moderne? Une étude de cas en Italie. Anthropologie & Santé, 15, 1–22.
- Rothman, B. K. (2016). A bun in the oven: How the food and birth movements resist industrialization. New York, NY: New York University Press.
- Sarda, G. (2011). Artificially maintained scientific controversies, the construction of maternal choice and caesarian section rates. Social Theory & Health, 9, 166–182.
- Sow, I. (2009). Divination, Marabout, Destin aux sources de l’imaginaire. Dakar: IFAN.
- Van Dijk, W., Faber, M. J., Tanke, M. A. C., Jeurissen, P. P. T., & Westert, G. P. (2016). Medicalisation and overdiagnosis: What society does to medicine. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(11), 619–622.
- Welch, H., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2011). Overdiagnosed. Making people sick in the pursuit of health. Boston: Bacon Press.
- World Health Organisation. (1996). Safe motherhood. Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/63167/1/WHO_FRH_MSM_96.24.pdf
- World Health Organisation. (2018). WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf?sequence=1
- World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank. (2015). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015 - Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank (pp. 15). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.