The impact of technology on pregnancy and childbirth: creating and managing obstetrical risk in different cultural and socio-economic contexts

References

• Akrich, M., & Pasveer, B. (2000). Multiplying obstetrics: Techniques of surveillance and forms of coordination. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 21, 63–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Galiani, S. (2018). Hospital Birth. In N. Hopwood, R. Flemming, & L. Kassell (Eds.), Reproduction: Antiquity to the present day (pp. 553–566). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2008). Conceiving risk, bearing responsibility: Fetal alcohol syndrome and the diagnosis of moral disorder. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2016). From rationalities to lifeworlds: Analysing the everyday handling of uncertainty and risk in terms of culture, society and identity. Health, Risk & Society, 18(7–8), 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge ? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. J., & Foster, D. (2014). Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., Fishman, J. R., Fosket, J. R., Mamo, L., & Shim, J. K. (2000). Technosciences et nouvelle biomédicalisation : Racines occidentales, rhizomes mondiaux. Sciences sociales et santé, 18(2), 11–42.
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, K. (2014). Risk in pregnancy and birth: Are we talking to ourselves? Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 481–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. E., & Sargent, C. F. (Eds.). (1997). Childbirth and authoritative knowledge. Crosscultural perspectives. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillaway, H., & Brubaker, S. J. (2006). Intersectionality and childbirth: How women from different social locations discuss epidural use. Race, Gender & Class, 13(3/4), 16–41.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, S. (2009). Gênero, saúde maternal e o paradoxo perinatal. RevBras Crescimento Desenvolvimento Humano, 19(2), 313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1995). The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology and Human Values, 20(4), 408–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faya Robles, A. (2019). Health regulations and social experiences of ‘high-risk’ pregnancies among young working-class women in Brazil. Health, Risk & Society, 1–22. In this volume.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. D., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giritli Nygren, K., & Olofsson, O. (2014). Intersectional approaches in health‐risk research: A critical review. Sociology Compass, 8(9), 1112–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Ivry, T., Takaki-Einy, R., & Murotsuki, J. (2019). What disasters can reveal about techno-medical birth: Japanese women’s stories of childbirth during the 11 March, 2011 earthquake. Health, Risk & Society, 1–21. In this volume.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1997). Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In R. E. Davis-Floyd, C. F. Sargent, & R. Rapp (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 55–79). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2015). Pluralist risk cultures: The sociology of childbirth in Vanuatu. Health, Risk & Society, 17(5–6), 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, J. W. (1986). Brought to bed: Childbearing in America, 1750 to 1950. New York: NY University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Löwy, I. (2018). Tangled diagnosis. Prenatal testing, women and risk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999). Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maffi, I., & Gouilhers, S. (2019). Conceiving of risk in childbirth: Obstetric discourses, medical management and cultural expectations in Switzerland and Jordan. Health, Risk & Society, 1–22. In this volume.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, C. (2005). Explaining caesarean section in Salvador da Bahia, Brazil. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(2), 215–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, P. (2015). Lamaze: An international history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, J. (2019). Buying reassurance: Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing among pregnant women of advanced maternal age in China. Health, Risk & Society, 1–19. In this volume.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quagliariello, C. (2019). Birth models in and between Italy and Senegal: A cross-cultural inquiry on the risks related to childbirth and birth technologies. Health, Risk & Society, 1–19. In this volume.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. (1998). Refusing prenatal diagnosis: The meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(1), 45–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. F. S. (2012). Scars of nation: Surgical penetration and the Ecuadorian state. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 17(2), 215–237.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. (2014). Pregnancy, birth and risk: An introduction. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. (2006). The institutional origins of risk: A new agenda for risk research. Health, Risk & Society, 8(3), 215–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, Risk & Society, 14(2), 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topçu, S. (2019). Caesarean or vaginarean epidemics? Techno-birth, risk and obstetric practice in Turkey. Health, Risk & Society, 1–23. In this volume.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert/lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity. Towards a new ecology (pp. 44–83). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar