Everyday strategies for handling food safety concerns: a qualitative study of distrust, contradictions, and helplessness among Taiwanese women

References

• Afflerback, S., Carter, S. K., Anthony, A. K., & Grauerholz, L. (2013). Infant-feeding consumerism in the age of intensive mothering and risk society. Journal of Consumer Culture, 13(3), 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaszewski, A. (2005). Risk communication: Identifying the importance of social context. Health, Risk & Society, 7(2), 101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillergeau, E., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2016). Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: Evidence and examples from the Netherlands. Health, Risk & Society, 18(7–8), 407–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bánáti, D. (2011). Consumer response to food scandals and scares. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 22(2–3), 56–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L. (2004). Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite, 42(1), 21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, L., Kjaernes, U., Ganskau, E., Minina, V., Voltchkova, L., Halkier, B., & Holm, L. (2005). Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway. European Societies, 7(1), 103–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. A. (2011). Interviews. In A. A. Berger (Ed.), Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 135–152). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bildtgård, T. (2008). Trust in food in modern and late-modern societies. Social Science Information, 47(1), 99–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, D. G. (1995). Trustworthy government: Leadership and management strategies for building trust and high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, K. (2004). Food and health: Expanding the agenda for health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 467–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. H., & Chen, Y. N. (2012). People would rather believe the local government than the central government: The typology and the political consequences of political trust. Review of Social Sciences, 6(14), 15–57.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. F. (2007). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Quality and Preference, 18(7), 1008–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. F. (2008). Consumer trust in food safety—A multidisciplinary approach and empirical evidence from Taiwan. Risk Analysis, 28(6), 1553–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., & Wu, Y. C. (2007). Exploring the content and quality of food pollution news reports-a case study involving the 2005 reports on” Dioxin Duck’s Eggs” and” Malachite Green Groupers”. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. C., & Yu, S. H. (2016). Risk construction and communication of food safety issues: A comparison of news media and government. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 30, 179–220.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, K. T., & Liou, H. M. (2010). ‘System Destroys Trust?’—Regulatory institutions and public perceptions of food risks in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 96(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, S. W., & Lin, Y. S. (2015). Food safety- viewpoints from issues and systems. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 34(5), 548–556.
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2010). Top 10 consumer news of 2010. Retrieved from http://www.consumers.org.tw/unit412.aspx?id=1422
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2011). Top 10 consumer news of 2011. Retrieved from http://www.consumers.org.tw/unit412.aspx?id=1538
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2012). Top 10 consumer news of 2012. Retrieved from http://www.consumers.org.tw/unit412.aspx?id=1638
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2013). Top 10 consumer news of 2013. Retrieved from http://www.consumers.org.tw/unit412.aspx?id=1758
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2014). Top 10 consumer news of 2014. Retrieved from http://www.consumers.org.tw/unit412.aspx?id=1870
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2016). Top 10 consumer news of 2015. Retrieved from http://www.consumers.org.tw/contents/events_ct?id=26&page
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2017). Top 10 consumer news of 2016. Retrieved from http://consumers.org.tw/contents/events_ct?id=264
   Google Scholar
• Consumer’s Foundation Chinese Taipei. (2018). Where is food safety? Retrieved from https://www.consumers.org.tw/contents/events_ct?id=1247
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33(2), 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S. (2011). Food labels as boundary objects: How consumers make sense of organic and functional foods. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 179–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everts, J., & Jackson, P. (2009). Modernisation and the practices of contemporary food shopping. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(5), 917–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernqvist, F., & Ekelund, L. (2014). Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food–A review. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 340–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R., & De Vries, P. W. (2008). Everyday behaviour and everyday risk: An approach to study people’s responses to frequently encountered food related health risks. Health, Risk & Society, 10(4), 385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1988). An empirical test of the search, experience and credence attributes framework. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 239–244.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., & Salter, B. (2003). The changing governance of biotechnology: The politics of public trust in the agrifood sector. Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy, 1(4), 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Y. C. (2013). Taiwan social change survey: Year 6 of Round 4. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica Web site. Retrieved from https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=977
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2010). Qualitative data analysis. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin, & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice a discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 173–184). The Netherlands: The Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2009). Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon ‘risk’? Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 493–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., Draper, A., & Dowler, E. (2003). Short cuts to safety: Risk and’rules of thumb’ in accounts of food choice. Health, Risk & Society, 5(1), 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G. (2005). Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3), 369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunt, K. G. (1997). What’s in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., Ward, P., Coveney, J., & Meyer, S. (2012). Trust in the Australian food supply: Innocent until proven guilty. Health, Risk & Society, 14(3), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. W., & Hsu, M. L. (2011). Framing of scientific development and risks: A news analysis of genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 20, 143–179.
   Google Scholar
• Jevšnik, M., Hlebec, V., & Raspor, P. (2008). Consumers’ awareness of food safety from shopping to eating. Food Control, 19(8), 737–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M. (2011). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 103–119). CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Biro, A., & MacKendrick, N. (2009). Lost in the supermarket: The corporate-organic foodscape and the struggle for food democracy. Antipode, 41(3), 509–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., Delaney, L., Hudson, E. M., McGloin, A., & Wall, P. G. (2010). Public perceptions of the dioxin incident in Irish pork. Journal of Risk Research, 13(7), 937–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjærnes, U., Harvey, M., & Warde, A. (2007). Trust in food: A comparative and institutional analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. T. (2013). Elements of public trust in the American food system: Experts, organizations, and genetically modified food. Food Policy, 41, 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikas, S., Lindeman, M., Roininen, K., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2007). Food risk perceptions, gender, and individual differences in avoidance and approach motivation, intuitive and analytic thinking styles, and anxiety. Appetite, 48(2), 232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H., Hu, W., Maynard, L. J., & Goddard, E. (2013). US consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for country‐of‐origin‐labelled beef steak and food safety enhancements. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie, 61(1), 93–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Sense making: Qualitative data analysis and interpretation. Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 3, 241–281.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. M. (2009). The perception of risks associated with food-related hazards and the perceived reliability of information sources ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacKendrick, N., & Stevens, L. (2016). “Taking back a little bit of control”: Managing the contaminated body through consumption. Sociological Forum, 31(2), 310–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOWnews. (2013). Word of the year 2013: Fake. Retrieved from https://www.nownews.com/news/20131210/1047879
   Google Scholar
• Park, M. S., Kim, H. N., & Bahk, G. J. (2017). The analysis of food safety incidents in South Korea, 1998–2016. Food Control, 81, 196–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, P. L., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, A., & Messina, F. (2003). Attitudes towards organic foods and risk/benefit perception associated with pesticides. Food Quality and Preference, 14(8), 637–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SciTech Reports. (2015). Get to know food certificates. Retrieved from http://scitechreports.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/blog-post_97.html
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, L. L., Teret, S. P., & Brownell, K. D. (2010). The food industry and self-regulation: Standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkin, E., Meyer, S. B., Coveney, J., Webb, T., & Wilson, A. M. (2016). The process of making trust related judgements through interaction with food labelling. Food Policy, 63, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Introduction: Researching risk and everyday life. In J. Tulloch & D. Lupton (Eds.), Risk and everyday life (pp. 1–15). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Udn video. (2014). Word of the year 2014: Black. Retrieved from https://video.udn.com/news/242252
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. M., Schmidt, D. B., Pillo-Blocka, F., & Cairns, G. (2009). Exploring global consumer attitudes toward nutrition information on food labels. Nutrition Reviews, 67(suppl_1), S102–S106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, C. C. (2004). Food markets and the geography of everyday life: Globalizing Taipei as a living city of market diversity. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 55, 47–99.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. H., & Wei, C. H. (2014). The impact of perceived risk on the image of country-of-origin and willingness to purchase: Negative message as a moderator. Taiwanese Agricultural Economic Review, 19(2), 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L., Zhong, Y., Shan, L., & Qin, W. (2013). Public risk perception of food additives and food scares. The case in Suzhou, China. Appetite, 70, 90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, J., & Zhang, W. (2013). Understanding China’s food safety problem: An analysis of 2387 incidents of acute foodborne illness. Food Control, 30(1), 311–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, R. M., & Morris, J. (2001). Food safety risk: Consumer perception and purchase behaviour. British Food Journal, 103(3), 170–187.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2008). Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health, Risk & Society, 10(5), 439–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2016). ‘In-between’ and other reasonable ways to deal with risk and uncertainty: A review article. Health, Risk & Society, 18(7–8), 348–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar