Rethinking the knowledge-attitudes model and introducing belief in human evolution: examining antecedents of public acceptability of human gene editing

References

• Allum, N., Sibley, E., Sturgis, P., & Stoneman, P. (2014). Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513492485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, M., & Diogo, R. (2019). Human enhancement: Genetic engineering and evolution. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2019(1), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoz026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Kim, E., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2009). Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507087304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Traill, W., Yee, W. M. S., Lusk, J. L., Jaeger, S. R., House, L. O., M, J. L., Jr, Valli, C., & Moore, M. (2006). Perceptions of the risks and benefits of genetically-modified foods and their influence on willingness to consume. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section C, 3(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/16507540600733900
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, C., Featherstone, J. D., Robbins, M., & Barnett, G. A. (2021). Examining the relationship between gene editing knowledge, value predispositions, and general science attitudes among U.S. farmers, scientists, policymakers, and the general public. Journal of Science Communication, 20(02), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20020202
   Google Scholar
• Ceasar, S. A., Rajan, V., Prykhozhij, S. V., Berman, J. N., & Ignacimuthu, S. (2016). Insert, remove or replace: A highly advanced genome editing system using CRISPR/Cas9. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (Bba)-molecular Cell Research, 1863(9), 2333–2344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-F., & Li, H.-L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18(4), 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., & Zhang, X. (2021). Changing social representations and agenda interactions of gene editing after crises: A network agenda-setting study on Chinese social media. Social Science Computer Review, 40(5), 1133–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439321998066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Factors influencing people’s acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge. Health Expectations, Naturalness, and Social Trust. Science Communication, 32(4), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009358919
   Google Scholar
• Cormick, C. (2007). Public attitudes towards GM crops and foods. Agricultural Science, 20(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.81114271321
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, C., Nicol, D., Bruce, G., Walshe, J., Treleaven, T., & Tuch, B. (2019). Predicting public attitudes toward gene editing of germlines: The impact of moral and hereditary concern in human and animal applications. Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., & Ledford, H. (2018). Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry. Nature, 563(7733), 607–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07545-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., & Reardon, S. (2015). Chinese scientists genetically modify human embryos. Nature, 22, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17378
   Google Scholar
• Delhove, J., Osenk, I., Prichard, I., & Donnelley, M. (2020). Public acceptability of gene therapy and gene editing for human use: A systematic review. Human Gene Therapy, 31(1–2), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2019.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2020). Predictors of public attitudes toward controversial science 1979–1990. Journal of Risk Research, 23(10), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1646313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, J., Bauer, M., Gaskell, G., Midden, C., Liakopoulos, M., & Scholten, L. (2000). Two cultures of public understanding of science and technology in Europe. In M. Dierkes & C. von Grote(Eds.), Between understanding and trust (pp. 101–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, C., Hoban, T., & Woodrum, E. (2000). Technology and morality: Influences on public attitudes toward biotechnology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 13(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-000-1003-0
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed., pp. xviii, 717). Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997). Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 22(1), 98–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., Fischler, C., Hampel, J., Jackson, J., Kronberger, N., Mejlgaard, N., Revuelta, G., Schreiner, C., Torgersen, H., & Wagner, W. (2006). Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Final report on Eurobarometer, 64(3), 1–85. http://goldenrice.org/PDFs/Eurobarometer_2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2011). The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 751–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510365246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G., Søndergaard, H. A., & Scholderer, J. (2004). How can we know what we like when we don’t understand it? Consumer attitude formation towards complex technical issues. International Conference on Research in Advertising, Oslo, Norge.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halstead, I., & Lewis, G. J. (2020). Understanding opposition to human gene editing: A role for pathogen disgust sensitivity? Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2020.12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., & Nadelson, L. S. (2012). A global perspective of the variables associated with acceptance of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(3), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0423-0
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Leong, A. D., Looi, J., Chen, L., Pang, N., & Tandoc, E. (2019). Science literacy or value predisposition? A meta-analysis of factors predicting public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy. Environmental Communication, 13(4), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, E. L., Kohl, P., Scheufele, D. A., Clifford, S., Shao, A., Xenos, M. A., & Brossard, D. (2020). Enhanced threat or therapeutic benefit? Risk and benefit perceptions of human gene editing by purpose and heritability of edits. Journal of Risk Research, 25(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1806911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedwab, A., Vears, D. F., Tse, C., & Gyngell, C. (2020). Genetics experience impacts attitudes towards germline gene editing: A survey of over 1500 members of the public. Journal of Human Genetics, 65(12), 1055–1065. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-0810-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerck, D., & Sweeney, J. C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozubek, J. (2017, January 9). How Gene Editing Could Ruin Human Evolution. TIME Ideas. https://time.com/4626571/crispr-gene-modification-evolution/
   Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8
   Google Scholar
• McCaughey, T., Sanfilippo, P. G., Gooden, G. E. C., Budden, D. M., Fan, L., Fenwick, E., Rees, G., MacGregor, C., Si, L., Chen, C., Liang, H. H., Baldwin, T., Pébay, A., & Hewitt, A. W. (2016). A global social media survey of attitudes to human genome editing. Cell Stem Cell, 18(5), 569–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. R. (2002). Finding Darwin’s God: A scientist’s search for common ground between God and evolution. Journal of the History of Biology, 35(1), 181–183. https://philpapers.org/rec/MILFDG
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, W., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (2004). Public attitudes toward agrobiotechnology: The mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness, and outrage. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 26(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00170.x
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. A. (2010). Examining the interaction of acceptance and understanding: How does the relationship change with a focus on macroevolution? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0194-4
   Google Scholar
• Pandya, J. (2019, June 9). Evolution or extinction: Where will the gene editing revolution take us. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/06/09/evolution-or-extinction-where-will-the-gene-editing-revolution-take-us/
   Google Scholar
• Park, H.-J. (2001). The creation-evolution debate: Carving creationism in the public mind. Public Understanding of Science, 10(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.3109/a036864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E., & Ohm, J. Y. (2014). Factors influencing the public intention to use renewable energy technologies in South Korea: Effects of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Energy Policy, 65, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R., Kahane, G., & Savulescu, J. (2012). Evolution, genetic engineering, and human enhancement. Philosophy & Technology, 25(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0091-6
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, S. H. (2001). Misplaced faith: Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Science Communication, 23(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, K. M., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2020). Of society, nature, and health: How perceptions of specific risks and benefits of genetically engineered foods shape public rejection. Environmental Communication, 14(7), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1710227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rughiniş, C. (2011). A lucky answer to a fair question: Conceptual, methodological, and moral implications of including items on human evolution in scientific literacy surveys. Science Communication, 33(4), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011408927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., & Slovic, P. (2004). Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00526.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., Howell, E. L., Rose, K. M., Brossard, D., & Hardy, B. W. (2017). US attitudes on human genome editing. Science, 357(6351), 553–554. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan3708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Harris Poll. (2005). Nearly Two-thirds of US Adults Believe Human Beings Were Created by God. https://faunalytics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Citation588.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The President’s Council on Bioethics. (2003). Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of happiness. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/research/pbc/reports/beyondtherapy/
   Google Scholar
• Traill, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M. S., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., Moore, M., & Morrow, J. L. J. (2004). Categories of GM risk-benefit perceptions and their antecedents. Agbioforum, 7(4), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.037
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3621–3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., & Malson, J. (2020). Science, God, and nature: A textual and frequency analysis of Facebook comments on news articles about agricultural and environmental gene editing. Environmental Communication, 14(7), 1004–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1761853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfson, A. (2020, November 20). With CRISPR, humans can create their own evolutionary future. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/with-crispr-humans-can-create-their-own-evolutionary-future/2020/11/19/a18aa022-234c-11eb-a688-5298ad5d580a_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Hobbs, J. E. (2020). Supporters or opponents: Will cultural values shape consumer acceptance of gene editing? Journal of Food Products Marketing, 26(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2020.1715316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Chen, A., & Zhang, W. (2021). Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies: Multiple discourses of gene editing on social media. Public Understanding of Science, 30(5), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520987754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar