Managing risk: social workers’ intervention strategies in cases of domestic abuse against people with learning disabilities

References

• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2000). Risk society revisited: theory, politics and research programmes. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond (pp. 211–229). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2014). Risk and vulnerability discourses in health. In L. Beddoe & J. Maidment (Eds.), Social work practice for promoting health and wellbeing: critical issues (pp. 51–62). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, A. (2020). Social Work Law (5th) ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braye, S., Orr, D., & Preston-Shoot, M. (2017). Autonomy and protection in self-neglect work: the ethical complexity of decision-making. Ethics and Social Welfare, 11(4), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2017.1290814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Gale, N. (2018). Theorising risk work: Analysing professionals’ lifeworlds and practices. Professions and Professionalism, 8(1), e1988–e1988. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1988
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social Constructionism (2nd) ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, I., & Drakeford, M. (2005). Scandal, social policy and social welfare. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Care Act, c.23. (2014). (Eng.). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. (2020). Still getting away with murder: disability hate crime in england. Inclusion London.
   Google Scholar
• Clawson, R., & Fyson, R. (2017). Forced marriage of people with learning disabilities: A human rights issue. Disability & Society, 32(6), 810–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1320271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, L. (2018November3). The Care Act 2014 overview. Luke Clements. Retrieved 27 June, 2022. http://www.lukeclements.co.uk/resources/care-act-2014-overview-guide/
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2000). No secrets: Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/194272/No_secrets__guidance_on_developing_and_implementing_multi-agency_policies_and_procedures_to_protect_vulnerable_adults_from_abuse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC). (2022). Care and Support Statutory Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/care-act-statutory-guidance/care-and-support-statutory-guidance
   Google Scholar
• Diaconescu, M. (2015). Burnout, secondary trauma and compassion fatigue in social work. Revista de Asistenta Sociala, 3, 57–63. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=300984
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., & Robb, M. (2016). Working with women with a learning disability experiencing domestic abuse: How social workers can negotiate competing definitions of risk. British Journal of Social Work, 46(3), 773–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domestic Abuse Act 2021.(c.17). (Eng.). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2021/17/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and Blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H., & Harpur, P. (2016). Intellectual disabilities, domestic violence and legal engagement. Disability & Society, 31(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1167673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. C., Clare, I. C., & Holland, A. J. (2008). To empower or to protect? Constructing the ‘vulnerable adult’ in English law and public policy. Legal Studies, 28(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00085.x
   Google Scholar
• Fahmy, E., Williamson, E., & Pantazis, C. (2016). Evidence and policy review – domestic violence and poverty. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, A. (1994). Sexual abuse in adults with learning disabilities: part 1: a review of the literature. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(2), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1994.tb00115.x
   Google Scholar
• Fyson, R., & Cromby, J. (2013). Human rights and intellectual disabilities in an era of ‘choice’. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(12), 1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01641.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyson, R., & Kitson, D. (2007). Independence or protection–does it have to be a choice? Reflections on the abuse of people with learning disabilities in Cornwall. Critical Social Policy, 27(3), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018307078850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. (2007). Risk and social work practice. Australian Social Work, 60(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070701671131
   Google Scholar
• Hester, M. (2011). The Three Planet Model: Towards an Understanding of Contradictions in Approaches to Women and Children’s Safety in Contexts of Domestic Violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, L., Khemka, I., Golden, H., & Chatzistyli, A. (2013). Views and values of developmental disabilities and domestic violence/sexual assault support professionals regarding the prevention and handling of situations of abuse. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollomotz, A. (2009). Beyond ‘vulnerability’: An ecological model approach to conceptualising risk of sexual violence against people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2021November1). Istanbul Convention: 5th progress report 2021 (accessible web version). Retrieved. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/istanbul-convention-implementation-progress-report-2021/istanbul-convention-5th-progress-report-2021-accessible-web-version 11 July, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2022). Domestic abuse statutory guidance. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1089015/Domestic_Abuse_Act_2021_Statutory_Guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. (2005). On ‘risk work’: Professional discourse, accountability, and everyday action. Health, Risk & Society, 7(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570500229820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jew, T., Duggal, S., Carr, S., Ercolani, M., Glasby, J., Kinghorn, P., Millar, R., Newbigging, K., Tanner, D., & Afentou, N. (2019). IMPLEMENTING THE CARE ACT 2014: Building social resources to prevent, reduce or delay needs for care and support in adult social care in England. University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2014). The story of Baby P: Setting the record straight. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, social policy and welfare. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association (LGA) and Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS). (2020). Making Safeguarding Personal Outcome Framework. 11 July, 2022. https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/25.155%20Making%20Safeguarding%20Personal%20Outcomes%20Framework_03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). Risk (2nd) ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery, M. (2012). Social work and personalisation. British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, K. (2017). Choosing to live with harm? A presentation of two case studies to explore the perspective of those who experienced adult safeguarding interventions. Ethics and Social Welfare, 11(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2017.1280069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (2019). ‘All I wanted was a happy life’: The struggles of women with learning disabilities1 to raise their children while also experiencing domestic violence. Journal of gender-based Violence, 3(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868019X15475690594298
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., Bates, C., Triantafyllopoulou, P., Hunt, S., & Milne Skillman, K. (2019). “Put bluntly, they are targeted by the worst creeps society has to offer”: Police and professionals’ views and actions relating to domestic violence and women with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., Hunt, S., & Milne‐Skillman, K. (2017). ‘I know it was every week, but I can’t be sure if it was every day: Domestic violence and women with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, S. (2011). Ethical Decision making in situations of self-neglect and squalor among older people. Ethics & Social Welfare, 5(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.546179
   Google Scholar
• Mental Capacity Act 2005 (c.9). (Eng). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G. (2005). Employment, Individualisation and insecurity: rethinking the risk society perspective. The Sociological Review, 53(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00506x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of National Statics. (2019). Disability and Crime UK. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/disability/bulletins/disabilityandcrimeuk/2019#domestic-abuse
   Google Scholar
• Peckham, N. G. (2007). The vulnerability and sexual abuse of people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2006.00428
   Google Scholar
• Peckover, S. (2014). Domestic abuse, safeguarding children and public health: Towards an analysis of discursive forms and surveillant techniques in contemporary UK policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1770–1787. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penhale, B., Brammer, A., Morgan, P., Kingston, P., & Preston-Shoot, M. (2017). The Care Act 2014: A new legal framework for safeguarding adults in civil society. The Journal of Adult Protection, 19(4), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-06-2017-0024
   Google Scholar
• Pestka, K., & Wendt, S. (2014). Belonging: Women living with intellectual disabilities and experiences of domestic violence. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.902358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard-Jones, L. (2018). “Adults at risk”: “vulnerability” by any other name? The Journal of Adult Protection, 2(10), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-07-2017-0029
   Google Scholar
• Quarmby, K. (2008). Getting away with murder: Disabled people’s experiences of hate crime in the UK. Report for Disability Now. UK Disabled People’s Council and SCOPE.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, R., Banks, C., McLaughlin, H., Bellamy, C., & Thackray, D. (2016). Is domestic abuse an adult social work issue? Social Work Education, 35(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1140733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., Huber, M., & Gaskell, G. (2006). A theory of risk colonisation: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society, 35(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500465865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D., & Cabrita Gulyurtlu, S. S. (2014). A scoping review of personalisation in the UK: Approaches to social work and people with learning disabilities. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE). (2018). Gaining access to an adult suspected to be at risk of neglect or abuse . https://www.scie.org.uk/safeguarding/adults/practice/gaining-access
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, N., Miller, P., Richardson Foster, H., & Thomson, G. (2011). A Stop-Start Response: Social Services’ Interventions with Children and Families Notified following Domestic Violence Incidents. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2009). Rethinking coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1509–1525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209347452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter-Brice, A., Cox, R., Priest, H., & Thompson, F. (2012). What do women with learning disabilities say about their experiences of domestic abuse within the context of their intimate partner relationships? Disability & Society, 27(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.659460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2006). Social work in a risk society: Social and political perspectives. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wigham, S., Hatton, C., & Taylor, J. L. (2011). The effects of traumatising life events on people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2010.534576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar