Interrogating the deployment of ‘risk’ and ‘vulnerability’ in the context of early intervention initiatives to prevent child sexual exploitation

References

• Alwang, J., Siegel, P., Jorgensen, B., & Steen, L. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines. In Social protection discussion papers and notes 23304. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Baillergeau, E. (2016). Talking about risk-taking with potentially ‘problematic’ risk-takers: A study of preventive interactions under high uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 19(10), 1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1154092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellis, M. A., Hale, G., Bennett, A., Chaudry, M., & Kilfoyle, M. (2000). Ibiza uncovered: Changes in substance use and sexual behaviour amongst young people visiting an international night-life resort. International Journal of Drug Policy, 11(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(00)00053-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2013). A theory of governance. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billingham, L., & Irwin-Rogers, K. (2021). The terrifying abyss of insignificance: Marginalisation, mattering and violence between young people. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(5), 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1178
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. (2013). Conceputalising risk and need: The rise of actuarialism and the death of welfare? Practitioner assessment and intervention in the youth offending service. Youth Justice, 13(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480212474732
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Social Work. (2017) Constructing a Definition of Vulnerability – Attempts to Define and Measure. [Retrieved 27th July 2021], fromhttps://www.basw.co.uk/resources/constructing-definition-vulnerability-–-attempts-define-and-measure
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2011). “Vulnerability”: handle with care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.597165
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (2015). Vulnerability and young people: Care and social control in policy and practice. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & Sanders, T. (2017). Pragmatic, progressive, problematic: Addressing vulnerability through a local street sex work partnership initiative. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, L., & Deakin, J. (2021). What we talk about when we talk about vulnerability and youth crime: A narrative review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 58(3), 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101605
   Google Scholar
• CAGE. (2018). The science of pre-crime: The secret radicalisation study underpinning prevent.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R. (1991). From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality (pp. 281–299). Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. (2012). Reconceptualising hate crime victimisation through the lens of vulnerability and difference. Theoretical Criminology, 16(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612439432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmas, H., & Srivastava, J. (2019) Public health approaches in policing: A discussion paper. Coventry: College of Policing.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, A. (2016). All of us are vulnerable, but some are more vulnerable than others: The political ambiguity of vulnerability studies: An Ambivalent Critique. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 17(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2016.1153896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M., & Hindess, B. (1998). Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Degenhardt, T., & Bourne, M. (2018). When risks meet: The dance of experience, professional expertise and science in border security technology and development. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 20(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818811896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2018) Policing 4.0: Deciding the Future of UK Policing. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/public-sector/deloitte-uk-future-of-policing.pdf [Retrieved 11th June 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., Clare, I., & Holland, A. (2008). To Empower or to Protect? Constructing the “Vulnerable Adult” in English Law and Public Policy. Legal Studies, 28(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00085.x
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B. (2009). Vulnerability: Questioning the Certainties in Social Work and Health. International Social Work, 52(4), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872809104251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2010) ‘The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State’, Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 10-130.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2012) ‘“Elderly” as Vulnerable: Rethinking the Nature of Individual and Societal Responsibility’, Emory Legal Studies Research Paper, No 12-224.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. (2007). Crime, Victimisation and Vulnerability. In S. Walklate (Ed.), Handbook of Victims and Victimisation (pp.91–118). Willian Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2009). Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon ‘risk’? Health, Risk and Society, 11(6), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903329474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grierson, J. (2019) ‘My son was terrified: How Prevent alienates UK Muslims’, The Guardian, January 27.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, R., & Ford, M. (2018). Young people, violence and knives: Revisiting the evidence and policy discussions. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, 3, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2020). Ageing and universal beneficial vulnerability. In D. Bedford & J. Herring (Eds.), Embracing Vulnerability (pp. 63–78). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2015) PM unveils tough new measures to tackle child sexual exploitation. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-unveils-tough-new-measures-to-tackle-child-sexual-exploitation [Retrieved 18th May 2018]
   Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2017) State of Policing: The Annual Assessment of Policing in England and Wales. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-content/uploads/state-of-policing-2016.pdf [Retrieved 11th June 2021]
   Google Scholar
• HM Prison and Probation Service. (2017). A Process Evaluation of the Structured Risk Guidance for Extremist Offenders. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2016) Home Secretary’s College of Policing Speech on Vulnerability. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/home-secretarys-college-of-policing-speech-on-vulnerability [Retrieved 27th July 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Jay, A. (2014) Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham, 1997-2013. https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham [Retrieved 11 January]
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2001). The Post Welfare State and the Government of Youth at Risk. Social Justice, 28(4), 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Khaleeli, H. (2015) ‘You worry they could take your kids: Is the Prevent strategy demonising Muslim schoolchildren?’ The Guardian, September 23.
   Google Scholar
• Know About CSE. (2015) Parents and Carers. http://knowaboutcse.co.uk/parents/ [Retrieved 11th January 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Leviner, P., & Sardiello, T. (2018) The Swedish Ban on Corporal Punishment of Children in a Multicultural Context – Conflicting Logics in the Social Services, Stockholm Faculty of Law Research Paper Series, No 53.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M., & Dean, C. (2015). The development of structured guidelines for assessing risk in extremist offenders. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000035
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, P., & Dietz, T. (2008). Structure, Agency and Environment: Toward an Integrated Perspective on Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 39(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Munro, V., & Scoular, E. (2012). Abusing Vulnerability? Contemporary Law and Policy Responses to Sex Work in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies, 20(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mythen, G. (2014). The Risk Society: Crime, Security and Justice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G. (2020). Against the Odds? Unravelling the Paradoxes of Risk Prevention in Counter Radicalisation Strategy. In J. Pratt & J. Thompson (Eds.), Criminal Justice, Risk and the Revolt Against Uncertainty (pp. 167–189). Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., & Baillergeau, E. (2021). Considering strategies designed to counter radicalisation: Comparative reflections on approaches in the United Kingdom and Belgium. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(5), 1133–1152. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1197
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., & Walklate, S. (2006). Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Crime Agency. (2017). Are you Worried about Online Sexual Abuse or the Way Someone has been Communicating with you Online? https://www.ceop.police.uk/safety-centre/[Retrieved 1 June 2017]
   Google Scholar
• NPCC. (2018) National Policing Vulnerability Knowledge and Practice Programme (VKPP) Briefing. https://whatworks.college.police.uk/Research/Documents/VKPP_Briefing.pdf [Retrieved 1st June 2021]
   Google Scholar
• NPCC. (2020). National Vulnerability Action Plan (NVAP) Revised 2020-22 v2.
   Google Scholar
• NSPCC. (2019) Online Abuse: Facts and Statistics, available at https://www.nspcc.org.uk/preventing-abuse/child-abuse-and-neglect/online-abuse/facts-statistics/ [Retrieved 11th January 2019]
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. M., & Waddell, S. (2015). What works to prevent gang involvement, youth violence and crime. In A Rapid Review of Interventions Delivered in the UK and Abroad. Early Intervention Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Office, H., & Javid, S. (2018) Home Office Announces New Measures to Tackle Serious Violence. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-announces-new-measures-to-tackle-serious-violence [accessed 9th January 2019]
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, G., & Clarke-Pearson, K., & and Council on Communications and Media. (2011). The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents and Families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P. (1992). Risk, Power and Crime Prevention. Economy and Society, 21(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149200000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J., Gasser, U., Simun, M., & Barnes, R. (2009). ‘Youth, Creativity, and Copyright in the Digital Age’. International Journal of Learning & Media, 1(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0022
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2010). “From Dangerousness to Risk”: The Growing Importance of Screening and Surveillance Systems for Safeguarding and Promoting the Well-being of Children. Health, Risk and Society, 12(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903508697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph, N., Birks, M., & Chapman, Y. (2015). The Methodological Dynamism of Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915611576
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (2nd) ed.). Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., Huber, M., & Gaskell, G. (2006). A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society, 35(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500465865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland, E. (2006). Young people, risk taking and risk making: Some thoughts for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 36(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2002). Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, S. (2018). Owning Risk: Sex Worker Subjectivities and the Reimagining of Vulnerability and Victimhood. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(6), 1462–1479. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, S. (2012). Critically reflecting on being a ‘at risk’ and ‘a risk’ in vulnerable people policing. In I. Bartkowiak-Théron & N. Asquith (Eds.), Policing Vulnerability (pp. 20–32). Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Gabe, J. (2003). Partners in Health, Partners in Crime: Exploring the Boundaries of Criminology and Sociology of Health and Illness. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trebilcock, J., & Weston, S. (2020). Mental Health and Offending: Care, Coercion and Control. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, J. (2014). Attitude Before Method: Disability in Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment. Disasters, 38(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2020). The contested concept of vulnerability - A literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., & Mythen, G. (2011). Beyond risk theory: Experiential knowledge and “knowing otherwise”. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811398456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., & Mythen, G. (2015). Contradictions of Terrorism: Security, Risk and Resilience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walley, P., & Adams, M. (2019). An evaluation of demand management practices in UK police forces. https://www.open.ac.uk/centres/policing/sites/www.open.ac.uk.centres.policing/files/files/News/An%20Evaluation%20of%20Demand-Management-Practices-in-UK-Final-report.pdf [accessed 11th June 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S., Kerr, J., & Tomkins, C. (2017, November). A Process Evaluation of the Structured Risk Guidance for Extremist Offenders. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.
   Google Scholar
• Werth, R. (2017). Individualising Risk: Moral Judgement, Professional Knowledge and Affect in Parole Evaluations. British Journal of Criminology, 57(4), 808–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, S. (2014). The origins of conflict in dependent drug treatment: Lessons for partnership working. British Journal of Community Justice, 12(1), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, S. (2016). The everyday work of the drug treatment practitioner: The influence and constraints of a risk-based agenda. Critical Social Policy, 36(4), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316632666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, S., & Mythen, G. (2021). ‘Disentangling practitioners’ understandings of child sexual exploitation: The risks of assuming otherwise?’. Criminology & Criminal Justice: the International Journal of Policy and Practice, 22(5), 774–789. Available at Onlinefirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211031336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wishart, G. (2003). The Sexual Abuse of People with Learning Difficulties: Do we Need a Social Model Approach to Vulnerability. The Journal of Adult Protection, 5(3), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/14668203200300021
   Google Scholar
• Zedner, L. (2007). Pre-Crime and Post-Criminology? Theoretical Criminology, 7(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480607075851
   Google Scholar
• Zedner, L. (2010). Pre-Crime and Pre-Punishment: A Health Warning. Criminal Justice Matters, 81(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2010.505409
   Google Scholar