Risk at the boundaries of social work: an editorial

References

• Alfandari, R., Taylor, B. J., Baginsky, M., Campbell, J., Helm, D., Killick, C., Mccafferty, P., Mullineux, J., Shears, J., Sicora, A., & Whittaker, A. Making sense of risk: Social work at the boundary between care and control. (2023). Health, Risk & Society, 25(1), 1–18. this issue. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2147904
   Google Scholar
• Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Meeuwsen, M. W., de Jong, N. M., Oort, F. J., Stams, G. J. J., & Hoeve, M. (2019). Risk factors for child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 145(5), 459. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L., & Cree, V. (2017). The risk paradigm and the media in child protection. In M. Connolly (Ed)., Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Child Protection (1st ed.). (pp. 15–28). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Gale, N. (2018). Developing a sociology of risk work in client-facing contexts: An editorial (Vol. 20). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers, C. (2018). ‘What is the headspace they are in when they are making those referrals?’exploring the lifeworlds and experiences of health and social care practitioners undertaking risk work within the prevent strategy. Health, Risk & Society, 20(1–2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2018.1437121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, H., & Townsend, J. (1992). Boundaries. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & Warner, J. (2018). Let’s stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of’child protection’. Families, Relationships and Societies, 7(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674316X14552878034622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, D. L. (1986). Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From moral certainty to rational inquiry in social work practice. Social Services Review, 60(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1086/644396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, N., Thomas, G. M., Thwaites, R., Greenfield, S., & Brown, P. (2016). Towards a sociology of risk work: A narrative review and synthesis. Sociology Compass, 10(11), 1046–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfreson, S. D., & Moriarty, L. J. (2006). Clinical versus actuarial judgments in criminal justice decisions: Should one replace the other. Federal probation, 70(2), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. (2007). Risk and social work practice. Australian Social Work, 60(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070701671131
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. (2014). Practitioner perspectives on risk: Using governmentality to understand contemporary probation practice. European Journal of Criminology, 11(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813495758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Work. (2022). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2013). Risk assessment and risk management. In M. Davies (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to social work (3rd Edition ed., pp. 333–342). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H., Parton, N., Walsh, M., & Waterson, J. (1997). Concepts of risk in relation to organizational structure and functioning within the personal social services and probation. Social Policy & Administration, 31(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Lindberg, K., Mørk, B. E., Nicolini, D., Raviola, E., & Walter, L. (2019). Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 704–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G., & Demir, I. (2021). Translating risk: How social workers’ epistemological assumptions shape the way they share knowledge. Health, Risk & Society, 23(1–2), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2021.1888892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, J. Personal narratives, public risk: Using Foucault’s ‘confessional’ to examine adult retrospective disclosures of childhood abuse. (2023). Health, Risk & Society, 25(1), 1–14. this issue. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2023.2166019
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., & Weston, S. Interrogating the deployment of ‘risk’ and ‘vulnerability’ in the context of early intervention initiatives to prevent child sexual exploitation. (2023). Health, Risk & Society, 25(1), 1–19. this issue. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2150750
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, J., Olaison, A., & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. ‘How shall we handle this situation?’ Social workers’ discussions about risks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Swedish elder care. (2023). Risk & Society, 25(1), 1–17. this issue. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2154323
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2019). Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for public health approaches to child protection. In B. Lonne, D. Scott, D. Higgins & T. I. Herrenkohl (Eds)., Re-vIsioning public health approaches for protecting children (pp. 65–78). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, M., & Mccarthy, M. Managing risk: Social workers’ intervention strategies in cases of domestic abuse against people with learning disabilities. (2023). Health, Risk & Society, 25(1), 1–16. this issue. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2143169
   Google Scholar
• Rode, N. (2017). Defining social work is a never-ending story. European Journal of Social Work, 20(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1185704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samant, A., Horowitz, A., Beiers, S., & Xu, K. (2021). Family surveillance by algorithm: The rapidly spreading tools few. Have Heard Of.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., & McKeown, C. (2013). Assessing and managing risk with people with physical disabilities: The development of a safety checklist. Health, Risk & Society, 15(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.764973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B., Spano, R., & Koenig, T. L. (2019). Back to Addams and Richmond: Was social work really divided house in the beginning. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 46(2), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• van der Put, C. E., Assink, M., & van Solinge, N. F. B. (2017). Predicting child maltreatment: A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of risk assessment instruments. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J., & Sharland, E. (2010). Editorial to risk and social work: Critical perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2006). Social work in a risk society: Social and political perspectives. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar