Verb production tasks in the measurement of communicative abilities in aphasia

REFERENCES

• Aftonomos, L. B., Steele, R. D., Appelbaum, J. S., & Harris, V. M. (2001). Relationships between impairment-level assessments and functional-level assessments in aphasia: Findings from LCC treatment programmes. Aphasiology, 15(10–11), 951–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggujaro, S., Crepaldi, D., Pistarini, C., Taricco, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2006). Neuro-anatomical correlates of impaired retrieval of verbs and nouns: Interaction of grammatical class, imageability and actionality. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19(3), 175–194. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arévalo, A. (2002, May). Teasing apart actions and objects: A picture-naming study. Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 14(2). Retrieved from http://crl.ucsd.edu/newsletter/14–2/article.html
   Google Scholar
• Aten, J. L., Caligiuri, M. P., & Holland, A. L. (1982). The efficacy of functional communication therapy for chronic aphasic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47(1), 93–96. doi:10.1044/jshd.4701.93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakheit, A. M., Carrington, S., Griffiths, S., & Searle, K. (2005). High scores on the Western Aphasia Battery correlate with good functional communication skills (as measured with the Communicative Effectiveness Index) in aphasic stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(6), 287–291. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16040530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, M. I., Maruszewski, M., & Urrea, D. (1969). Variation of stimulus context and its effect on word-finding ability in aphasics. Cortex, 5, 351–365. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5374220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Bamyaci, E., Hsu, C.-J., Lee, J., Yarbay Duman, T., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 652–673. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S., Maas, E., & Rispens, J. (2003). Assessing comprehension and production of verbs and sentences: The Verb and Sentence Test (VAST). Aphasiology, 17(1), 49–73. doi:10.1080/02687030244000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Jonkers, R. (1998). Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(11), 951–969. doi:10.1080/02687039808249463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Van Zonneveld, R. (2004). Broca’s aphasia, verbs and the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 198–202. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00432-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. D., Davies, K. G., Hermann, B. P., & Walters, G. (2000). Confrontation naming after anterior temporal lobectomy is related to age of acquisition of the object names. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 83–92. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00047-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Burton, M. W., & Mitchum, C. C. (2002). Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: Their effects are independent. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 353–371. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56(1), 107–137. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Greenwood, A., Grassly, J., & Hickin, J. (2008). Bridging the gap: Can impairment-based therapy for anomia have an impact at the psycho-social level? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43(4), 390–407. doi:10.1080/13682820701608001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2000). Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and Language, 72(3), 246–309. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, M., & Chiat, S. (2003). Noun–verb dissociations: A multi-faceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2), 231–250. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00017-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R. H. (1971). Effects of trial time and inter-trial interval on naming by aphasic subjects. Journal of Communication Disorders, 3(4), 289–301. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(71)90035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. (2012). On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 502. doi:10.1037/a0026748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlomagno, S., Nassimbeni, S., Zannino, G., Trifelli, E., Grattarola, C., & Razzano, C. (2013). Il Communicative Activities in Daily Life (CADL-2). Dati normativi della versione in lingua italiana [Normative data of the Italian version]. Logopedia e communicazione, 3(9), 285–304. Retrieved from http://www.erickson.it/Riviste/Pagine/Scheda-Numero-Rivista.aspx?ItemId=40582
   Google Scholar
• Carlomagno, S., Pandolfi, M., Labruna, L., Colombo, A., & Razzano, C. (2001). Recovery from moderate aphasia in the first year poststroke: Effect of type of therapy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(8), 1073–1080. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11494187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, G. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1989). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Thematic relations (pp. 263–300). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, C. R., Chen, G., Pieters, T. A., & Tandon, N. (2014). Category specific spatial dissociations of parallel processes underlying visual naming. Cerebral Cortex, 24(10), 2741–2750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1311–1337. doi:10.1080/02687030902756439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corina, D. P., Gibson, E. K., Martin, R., Poliakov, A., Brinkley, J., & Ojemann, G. (2005). Dissociation of action and object naming: Evidence from cortical stimulation mapping. Human Brain Mapping, 24(1), 1–10. doi:10.1002/hbm.20063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, H. K., Hinckley, J. J., Winkelseth, M., Carry, L., Walley, J., Bardach, L., … Sheimo, D. (1993). Quantifying connected speech samples of adults with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology, 7(2), 155–163. doi:10.1080/02687039308249503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaldi, D., Ingignoli, C., Verga, R., Contardi, A., Semenza, C., & Luzzatti, C. (2011). On nouns, verbs, lexemes, and lemmas: Evidence from the spontaneous speech of seven aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 25(1), 71–92. doi:10.1080/02687031003637114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90(11), 4957–4960. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.11.4957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380(11), 499–505. doi:10.1038/380499a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniele, A., Giustolisi, L., Silveri, M. C., Colosimo, C., & Gainotti, G. (1994). Evidence for a possible neuroanatomical basis for lexical processing of nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia, 32(11), 1325–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Aguiar, V., Paolazzi, C., & Miceli, G. (2015). tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: The role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics. Cortex, 63, 296–316. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., & Kauschke, C. (2003). Acquisition and loss of nouns and verbs: Parallel or divergent patterns? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 213–229. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00015-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D. B., Fix, S., Parrish, T. B., & Thompson, C. K. (2009). Argument structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(2), 196–215. doi:10.1016/j.neuroling.2008.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Segal, J. B., Lombrozo, T., & Kutas, M. (2000). Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain, 123(12), 2252–2566. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11099456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finocchiaro, C., Basso, G., Giovenzana, A., & Caramazza, A. (2010). Morphological complexity reveals verb-specific prefrontal engagement. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(6), 553–563. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finocchiaro, C., & Miceli, G. (2002). Verb actionality in aphasia: Data from two aphasic subjects. Folia Linguistica, 36(3–4), 335–357. doi:10.1515/flin.2002.36.3-4.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., & Holland, A. L. (1989). Functional communication in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(4), 535–540. doi:10.1044/jshd.5404.535
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fucetola, R., Tabor Connor, L., Perry, J., Leo, P., Tucker, F., & Corbetta, M. (2006). Aphasia severity, semantic, and depression predict functional communication in acquired aphasia. Aphasiology, 20(5), 449–461. doi:10.1080/02687030500390177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, E., & Goldfarb, R. (2005). Grammatical category ambiguity in aphasia. Brain and Language, 95, 293–303. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination booklet. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Stuss, D. T. (1979). Naming to picture versus description in three aphasic subgroups. Cortex, 15, 199–211. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/477337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goral, M., & Kempler, D. (2009). Training verb production in communicative context: Evidence from a person with chronic non‐fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(12), 1383–1397. doi:10.1080/02687030802235203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (1998). The basic elements of argument structure. MIT Working papers in linguistics, 32, 73–118. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/~linguistics/events/tributes/hale/papers/Ch.1_Basic_Elements.3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J., Jr., Berndt, R. S., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction. Nature, 316(6027), 439–440. doi:10.1038/316439a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1–3), 181–204. doi:10.1080/01690960400002117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture-naming tasks provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology, 22(2), 184–203. doi:10.1080/02687030701262613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Representation of grammatical knowledge in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 369–407. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1980). Communicative Abilities in Daily Living (CADL). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A., Frattali, C., & Fromm, D. (1998). Communication Activities of Daily Living (CADL-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L., Frattali, C., & Fromm, D. (1999). CADL-2 Communication Activities of Daily Living: Examiner’s manual. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., & Willmes, K. (1983). The Aachen Aphasia Test. Advances in Neurology, 42, 291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. J. (2001). Social validity of changes in informativeness and efficiency of aphasic discourse following linguistic specific treatment (LST). Brain and Language, 78(1), 115–127. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkers, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2007). Action naming in anomic aphasic speakers: Effects of instrumentality and name relation. Brain and Language, 102(3), 262–272. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. C., Hallowell, B., Code, C., Amstrong, E., Roberst, P., Pound, C., & Katz, L. (2000). A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(2), 303–314. doi:10.1080/136828200247205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayama, T. (2012). The guidelines for awake craniotomy: Guidelines Committee of The Japan Awake Surgery Conference. Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 52, 119–141. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/52/3/52_3_119/_pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., Rudrauf, D., Manzel, K., & Tranel, D. (2012). Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex, 48(7), 826–848. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000). Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. Analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors. Brain and Language, 73(3), 347–392. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western Aphasia Battery. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805–825. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2464719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubrano, V., Filleron, T., Démonet, J. F., & Roux, F. E. (2014). Anatomical correlates for category-specific naming of objects and actions: A brain stimulation mapping study. Human Brain Mapping, 35(2), 429–433. doi:10.1002/hbm.22189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., Contardi, A., & Pinna, G. D. (2002). Verb-noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: The role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language, 444(81), 432–444. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mätzig, S., Druks, J., Masterson, J., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Noun and verb differences in picture-naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex, 45(6), 738–758. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Laudanna, A., Burani, C., & Capasso, R. (1994). Batteria per l’analisi dei deficit afasici [Battery for the Evaluation of Aphasic Disorders]. Rome: CEPSAG.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, C., Nocentini, U., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs. Aphasiology, 2(3/4), 351–358. doi:10.1080/02687038808248937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36(3), 447–492. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90079-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20(2), 207–220. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6204813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 705–714. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33(10), 1281–1303. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8552229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 57–78. doi:10.1080/02643290342000122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Review: Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/02687030444000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582. doi:10.1038/nrn1706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Neininger, B., Elbert, T., Mohr, B., Rockstroh, B., Koebbel, P., & Taub, E. (2001, May). Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke, 32(7), 1621–1626.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2009). Spatiotemporal signatures for large-scale synfire chains for speech processing as revealed by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 19(1), 79–88. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rofes, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Martínez-Ferreiro, S. (2014). Conditional and future tense impairment in non-fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(1), 99–115. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.850650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofes, A., De Witte, E., Mariën, P., & Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Object naming may overestimate patients’ language performance after neuro-oncological surgery: A case study. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie, 18(S01), 59–63. Retrieved from rjh.ub.rug.nl/sstp/article/download/11250/8753
   Google Scholar
• Rofes, A., & Miceli, G. (2014). Language mapping with verbs and sentences in awake surgery: A review. Neuropsychology Review, 24(2), 185–199. doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9258-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, S. A., van Rooij, D., Lindemann, O., Willems, R. M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The function of words: Distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1844–1851. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sach, M., Seitz, R. J., & Indefrey, P. (2004). Unified inflectional processing of regular and irregular verbs: A PET study. Neuroreport, 15(3), 533–537. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000113529.32218.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2804622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, K., & Caramazza, A. (2003a). Grammatical processing of nouns and verbs in left frontal cortex? Neuropsychologia, 41(9), 1189–1198. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, K., & Caramazza, A. (2003b). The representation of grammatical categories in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). CAT: Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Székely, A., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer, G., … Bates, E. (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex, 41(1), 7–25. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70174-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2003). Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2), 151–167. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00014-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., Lange, K. L., Schneider, S. L., & Shapiro, L. P. (1997). Agrammatic and non-brain damaged subject’s verb and verb argument structure production. Aphasiology, 11(4–5), 473–490. doi:10.1080/02687039708248485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranel, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). A neural basis for the retrieval of words for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(7), 655–674. doi:10.1080/02643290143000015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranel, D., Kemmerer, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2003). Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 409–432. doi:10.1080/02643290244000248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapkini, K., Jarema, G., & Kehayia, E. (2002). A morphological processing deficit in verbs but not in nouns: A case study in a highly inflected language. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 265–288. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00039-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsigka, S., Papadelis, C., Braun, C., & Miceli, G. (2014). Distinguishable neural correlates of verbs and nouns: A MEG study on homonyms. Neuropsychologia, 54, 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L., Bright, P., Fletcher, P., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2004). Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia, 42(4), 512–523. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanVoorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50. Retrieved from http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol03-2/p043/p043.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E., & Freund, R. D. (1987). Use of multiple regression in counseling psychology research: A flexible data-analytic strategy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 372–382. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106(4), 859–878. doi:10.1093/brain/106.4.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107(3), 829–854. doi:10.1093/brain/107.3.829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A., Webster, J., & Howard, D. (2005). Identifying and characterizing impairments: Principles and evidence. In A. Whitworth, J. Webster, & D. Howard (Eds.), A cognitive neuropsychological approach to assessment and intervention in aphasia (pp. 11–22). Hove: Taylor & Francis
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E. (1983). Factors influencing naming performance in aphasia: A review of the literature. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16. 357–372. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(83)90018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E., & Canter, G. J. (1982). The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syndromes. Brain and Language, 17, 92–106. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(82)90007-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. P., Carey, C. L., Tröster, A. I., & Grant, I. (2005). Action verb generation in HIV-1 infection. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1144–1151. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokohama, S., Miyamoto, T., Riera, J., Kim, J., Akitsuki, Y., Iwata, K., … Kawashima, R. (2006). Cortical mechanisms involved in the processing of verbs: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1304–1313. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16859416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45(1), 27–36. doi:10.1044/jshd.4501.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zingeser, L. B., & Berndt, R. (1988). Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications of models of language production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(4), 473–516. doi:10.1080/02643298808253270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingeser, L. B., & Berndt, R. S. (1990). Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia.Brain and Language, 39(1), 14–32. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(90)90002-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar