References
- Bauer, M., Oostenveld, R., Peeters, M., & Fries, P. (2006). Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(2), 490–501.
- Benwell, C. S. Y., Harvey, M., & Thut, G. (2014). On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length. NeuroImage, 86, 370–380.
- Benwell, C. S. Y., Thut, G., Grant, A., & Harvey, M. (2014). A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 113.
- Benwell, C. S. Y., Thut, G., Learmonth, G., & Harvey, M. (2013). Spatial attention: Differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2747–2756.
- Berlingeri, M., Danelli, L., Bottini, G., Sberna, M., & Paulesu, E. (2013). Reassessing the HAROLD model: Is the hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults a special case of compensatory-related utilisation of neural circuits? Experimental Brain Research, 224(3), 393–410.
- Berquin, A. D., Lijesevic, V., Blond, S., & Plaghki, L. (2010). An adaptive procedure for routine measurement of light-touch sensitivity threshold. Muscle & Nerve, 42(3), 328–338.
- Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18(4–5), 491–498.
- Brooks, J. L., Darling, S., Malvaso, C., & Della Sala, S. (2016). Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length. Brain and Cognition, 103, 12–22.
- Buitenhuis, S. M., Pondaag, W., Wolterbeek, R., & Malessy, M. J. A. (2018). Hand sensibility in healthy young children. Pediatric Neurology, 86, 52–56.
- Cabeza, R., McIntosh, A. R., Tulving, E., Nyberg, L., & Grady, C. L. (1997). Age-related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall. Neuroreport, 8(16), 3479–3483.
- Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 85–100.
- de Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image – Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 669–680.
- Di Vita, A., Boccia, M., Palermo, L., & Guariglia, C. (2016). To move or not to move, that is the question! Body schema and non-action oriented body representations: An fMRI meta-analytic study. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 37–46.
- Dolcos, F., Rice, H. J., & Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: Right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 819–825.
- Duverne, S., Motamedinia, S., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). The relationship between aging, performance, and the neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex (new York, N.Y. : 1991), 19(3), 733–744.
- Fruhstorfer, H., Gross, W., & Selbmann, O. (2001). von Frey hairs: New materials for a new design. European Journal of Pain (london, England), 5(3), 341–342.
- Guidotti Breting, L. M., Tuminello, E. R., & Duke Han, S. (2011). Functional neuroimaging studies in normal aging. In Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 10, 91–111.
- Head, H., & Holmes, G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34(2–3), 102–254.
- Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5(2), 166–170.
- Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (2012). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (5th ed., pp. 296–348). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Heilman, K. M., & Van Den Abell, T. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology, 30(3), 327–330.
- Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (2002). Spatial neglect. In A. Karnath, A. Milner, & G. Vallar (Eds.), The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglec (pp. 3–30). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93–110.
- Kesayan, T., Lamb, D. G., Falchook, A. D., Williamson, J. B., Salazar, L., Malaty, I. A., … Heilman, K. M. (2015). Abnormal tactile pressure perception in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(8), 808–815.
- Kesayan, T., Williamson, J. B., Falchook, A. D., Skidmore, F. M., & Heilman, K. M. (2016). Allocentric but not egocentric pseudoneglect of peripersonal space. Cognitive And Behavioral Neurology, 29(1), 18–23.
- Kinsbourne, M. (1977). Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Advances in Neurology, 18, 41–49.
- Li, Z., Moore, A. B., Tyner, C., & Hu, X. (2009). Asymmetric connectivity reduction and its relationship to “HAROLD” in aging brain. Brain Research, 1295, 149–158.
- Mark, V. W., & Heilman, K. M. (1990). Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects. Neurology, 40(4), 640–643.
- McCourt, M. E., & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37(7), 843–855.
- Nielson, K. A., Langenecker, S. A., & Garavan, H. (2002). Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 56–71.
- Ochando, A., & Zago, L. (2018). What are the contributions of handedness, sighting dominance, hand used to bisect, and visuospatial line processing to the behavioral line bisection bias? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1688.
- Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 177–182.
- Rossi, S., Miniussi, C., Pasqualetti, P., Babiloni, C., Rossini, P. M., & Cappa, S. F. (2004). Age-related functional changes of prefrontal cortex in long-term memory: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 24(36), 7939–7944.
- Schmitz, R., & Peigneux, P. (2011). Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect. Brain and Cognition, 76(3), 382–389.
- Schwoebel, J., & Branch Coslett, H. (2005). Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(4), 543–553.
- Semmes, J., Weinstein, S., Ghent, L., & Teuber, H.-L. (1960). Somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Stevens, S. S. (1961). To honor fechner and repeal his law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. Science (New York, N.Y.), 133(3446), 80–86.
- Stevens, S. S. (1970). Neural events and the psychophysical law. Science (New York, N.Y.), 170(3962), 1043–1050.
- Thambisetty, M., Wan, J., Carass, A., An, Y., Prince, J. L., & Resnick, S. M. (2010). Longitudinal changes in cortical thickness associated with normal aging. NeuroImage, 52(4), 1215–1223.
- Weinstein, S., & Sersen, E. A. (1961). Tactual sensitivity as a function of handedness and laterality. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 665–669.