Stratified performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is associated with differential responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI)

References

• American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, L. M., & Chafetz, M. D. (2018). Determination of the smoking gun of intent: Significance testing of forced choice results in social security claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(1), 132–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, M., Whiteside, D., Waters, D., Hellings, J., & Ji, P. (2014). Exploring the reliability and component structure of the personality assessment inventory in a neuropsychological sample. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(2), 237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. J., Cassidy, J. D., Holm, L., Kraus, J., & Coronado, V. G. (2004). Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: The WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36, 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using spss (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gaasedelen, O. J., Whiteside, D. M., Altmaier, E., Welch, C., & Basso, M. R. (2019). The construction and the initial validation of the cognitive bias scale for the personality assessment inventory. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33, 1467–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaasedelen, O. J., Whiteside, D. M., & Basso, M. (2017). Exploring the sensitivity of the personality assessment inventory symptom validity tests in detecting response bias in a mixed neuropsychological outpatient sample. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(5), 844–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. P., & Green, P. (2007). Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 14(2), 196–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2003). Word memory test for windows: User’s manual and program. Edmonton, Alberta: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., Allen, L. M., & Astner, K. (1996). The word memory test: A user’s guide to the oral and computer-administered forms, US version 1.1. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. A., Frazier, T. W., Busch, R. M., & Naugle, R. I. (2007). Relationships among Victoria symptom validity test indices and personality assessment inventory validity scales in a large clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(6), 917–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilsabeck, R. C., Gordon, S. N., Hietpas-Wilson, T., & Zartman, A. L. (2011). Use of trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) as a screening measure of effort: Suggested discontinuation rules. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(7), 1228–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiski, M. A., Shore, D. L., Hamilton, J. M., & Malec, J. F. (2015). Simulation of traumatic brain injury symptoms on the personality assessment inventory: An analogue study. Assessment, 22(2), 233–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., & Rennison, V. L. (2010). Influence of poor effort on self-reported symptoms and neurocognitive test performance following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(9), 961–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Exaggerated MMPI-2 symptom report in personal injury litigants with malingered neurocognitive deficit. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 673–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 18(4), 625–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2014). False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29, 364–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J., Bianchini, K. J., Boone, K. B., & Rohling, M. L. (2017). The MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF symptom validity scale (FBS/FBS-r) is not a measure of ‘litigation response syndrome’: Commentary on Nichols and Gass (2015). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(8), 1387–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippa, S. M. (2017). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: A clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1–35. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality assessment inventory (PAI): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Persinger, V. C., Whiteside, D. M., Bobova, L., Saigal, S. D., Vannucci, M. J., & Basso, M. R. (2017). Using the California verbal learning test, second edition as an embedded performance validity measure among individuals with TBI and individuals with psychiatric disorders. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1419507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., & Odland, A. P. (2016). Expert beliefs and practices regarding neuropsychological validity testing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 515–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. M. (2012). Effort, exaggeration and malingering after concussion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 83, 836–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumanti, M., Boone, K. B., Savodnik, I., & Gorsuch, R. (2006). Noncredible psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in a workers’ compensation “stress” claim sample. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(4), 754–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). The test of memory malingering. Toronto: Multi-Health System.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, S. A., Millis, S. R., Axelrod, B. N., & Hanks, R. A. (2013). Assessing effort: Differentiating performance and symptom validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1234–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, D. M., Dunbar-Mayer, P., & Waters, D. (2009). Relationship between TOMM performance and PAI validity scales in a mixed clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 523–553.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, D. M., Clinton, C., Diamonti, C., Stroemel, J., White, C., Zimberoff, A., & Waters, D. (2010). Relationship between suboptimal cognitive effort and the clinical scales of the personality assessment inventory. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(2), 315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, D. M., Dunbar-Mayer, P., & Waters, D. P. (2008). Relationship between TOMM performance and PAI validity scales in a mixed clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, D. M., Galbreath, J., Brown, M., & Turnbull, J. (2012). Differential response patterns on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in compensation-seeking and non-compensation-seeking mild traumatic brain injury patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(2), 172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar