References
- Allik, J., & Tuulmets, T. (1991). Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205986
- Amieva, H., Phillips, L. H., Della Sala, S., & Henry, J. D. (2004). Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 127(5), 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh045
- Arnaud, L., Lemaire, P., Allen, P., & Michel, B.-F. (2008). Strategic aspects of young, healthy older adults’, and Alzheimer patients’ arithmetic performance. Cortex, 44(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2006.03.001
- Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. (2001). Attention in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Handbook of Neuropsychology, 6(2), 51–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026432999380834
- Barth, H., Beckmann, L., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Nonsymbolic, approximate arithmetic in children: Abstract addition prior to instruction. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013046
- Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(39), 14116–14121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505512102
- Barth, H. C., & Paladino, A. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science, 14(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00962.x
- Bélanger, S., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2010). Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.021
- Boone, K. B., Lu, P., Back, C., King, C., Lee, A., Philpott, L., … Warner-Chacon, K. (2002). Sensitivity and specificity of the Rey Dot Counting Test in patients with suspect effort and various clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(7), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00166-4
- Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41
- Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
- Brand, M., Kalbe, E., & Kessler, J. (2002). Qualitative and quantitative differences in cognitive estimation of patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease from healthy controls – What are the differences? In P. Calabrese & A. Neugebauer (Eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 425–429). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812776563_0034
- Cappelletti, M., Butterworth, B., & Kopelman, M. (2012). Numeracy skills in patients with degenerative disorders and focal brain lesions: A neuropsychological investigation. Neuropsychology, 26(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026328
- Cappelletti, M., Didino, D., Stoianov, I., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Number skills are maintained in healthy ageing. Cognitive Psychology, 69, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.11.004
- Carlomagno, S., Lavarone, A., Nolfe, G., Bourene, G., Martin, C., & Deloche, G. (1999). Dyscalculia in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 99(3), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1999.tb07339.x
- Castel, A. D., Balota, D. A., Hutchison, K. A., Logan, J. M., & Yap, M. J. (2007). Spatial attention and response control in healthy younger and older adults and individuals with Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for disproportionate selection impairments in the simon task. Neuropsychology, 21(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.170
- Clayton, S., & Gilmore, C. (2015). Inhibition in tasks. Zdm, 47(5), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0655-2
- Clayton, S., Gilmore, C., & Inglis, M. (2015). Dot comparison stimuli are not all alike: The effect of different visual controls on ANS measurement. Acta Psychologica, 161, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.007
- Cohen, D. J., Blanc‐Goldhammer, D., & Quinlan, P. T. (2018). A Mathematical Model of How People Solve Most Variants of the Number‐Line Task. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2621–2647. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12698
- Collette, F., Schmidt, C., Scherrer, C., Adam, S., & Salmon, E. (2009). Specificity of inhibitory deficits in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 30(6), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.09.007
- Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press.
- Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L. H., Sacco, L., & Spinnler, H. (2004). The role of semantic knowledge on the cognitive estimation task – Evidence from Alzheimer s disease and healthy adult aging. Journal of Neurology, 251(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0292-8
- Deloche, G., Mannequin, D., Carlomagno, S., Agniel, A., Dordain, M., Pasquier, F., … Metz-Lutz, M. N. (1995). Calculation and number processing in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(4), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405151
- DeWind, N. K., & Brannon, E. M. (2016). Significant inter-test reliability across approximate number system assessments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00310
- Dietrich, J. F., Huber, S., Moeller, K., & Klein, E. (2015). The influence of math anxiety on symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,1621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01621
- Duchek, J. M., & Balota, D. A. (2005). Failure to control prepotent pathways in early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: Evidence from dichotic listening. Neuropsychology, 19(5), 687. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432999380834
- Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,1001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001
- Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage, 35(2), 940–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.061
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
- Fujimori, M., Imamura, T., Hirono, N., Ishii, K., Sasaki, M., & Mori, E. (2000). Disturbances of spatial vision and object vision correlate differently with regional cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 38(10), 1356–1361. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh051
- Fush, M. W., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low‐income homes: Contributions of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 16(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12013
- Gandini, D., Lemaire, P., & Dufau, S. (2008). Older and younger adults’ strategies in approximate quantification. Acta psychologica, 129(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.009
- Gandini, D., Lemaire, P., & Michel, B. F. (2009). Approximate quantification in young, HOA’, and Alzheimer patients. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.004
- Gebuis, T., & Gevers, W. (2011). Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition, 121(2), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.008
- Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2012). The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026218
- Gilmore, C., Cragg, L., Hogan, G., & Inglis, M. (2016). Congruency effects in dot comparison tasks: Convex hull is more important than dot area. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(8), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1221828
- Gilmore, C., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., & Cragg, L. (2015). The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. Zdm, 47(5), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y
- Girelli, L., & Delazer, M. (2001). Numerical abilities in dementia. Aphasiology, 15(7), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000122
- Goldstein, F. C., Green, J., Presley, R. M., O’Jile, J., Freeman, A., Watts, R., & Green, R. (1996). Cognitive estimation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology & Behavioral Neurology, 9(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00183-5
- Grafman, J., Kampen, D., Rosenberg, J., Salazar, A. M., & Boller, F. (1989). The progressive breakdown of number processing and calculation ability: A case study. Cortex, 25(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80012-7
- Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.121.4.480
- Guarino, A., Favieri, F., Boncompagni, I., Agostini, F., Cantone, M., & Casagrande, M. (2019). Executive functions in Alzheimer disease: A systematic review. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, 437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00437
- Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the” Number Sense”: The Approximateg Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012682
- Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07246
- Hinault, T., Badier, J. M., Baillet, S., & Lemaire, P. (2017). The sources of sequential modulations of control processes in arithmetic strategies: A magnetoencephalography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(6), 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01102
- Hinault, T., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2014). Sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects during strategy execution: An event-related potential study in arithmetic. Brain and Cognition, 91, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.09.001
- Hinault, T., Lemaire, P., & Phillips, N. (2016a). Aging and sequential modulations of poorer strategy effects: An EEG study in arithmetic problem solving. Brain Research, 1630(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.057
- Hinault, T., Lemaire, P., & Touron, D. (2016b). Aging effects in sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects during execution of memory strategies. Memory, 25(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1146300
- Hollands, J. G., & Dyre, B. P. (2000). Bias in proportion judgments: The cyclical power model. Psychological Review, 107(3), 500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.500
- Inglis, M., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Indexing the approximate number system. Acta Psychologica, 145, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.009
- Jekel, K., Damian, M., Wattmo, C., Hausner, L., Bullock, R., Connelly, P. J., … Kramberger, M. G. (2015). Mild cognitive impairment and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living: A systematic review. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0099-0
- Kaufmann, L., Montanes, P., Jacquier, M., Matallana, D., Eibl, G., & Delazer, M. (2002). About the relationship between numerical processing and arithmetics in early Alzheimer’s disease: A follow-up study. Brain and Cognition, 48(2–3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17365
- Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089910
- Kim, D., & Opfer, J. E. (2017). A unified framework for bounded and unbounded numerical estimation. Developmental psychology, 53(6), 1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000305
- Kopelman, M. D. (1991). Frontal dysfunction and memory deficits in the alcoholic Korsakoff syndrome and Alzheimer-type dementia. Brain, 114(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.brain.a101852
- Landy, D., Charlesworth, A., & Ottmar, E. (2017). Categories of large numbers in line estimation. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12342
- Landy, D., Silbert, N., & Goldin, A. (2013). Estimating large numbers. Cognitive Science, 37(5), 775–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12028
- Leibovich, T., & Henik, A. (2013). Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00375
- Leibovich, T., Katzin, N., Harel, M., & Henik, A. (2017). From “sense of number” to “sense of magnitude”: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40,164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000960
- Lemaire, P., & Hinault, T. (2014). Age-related differences in sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects. Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000244
- Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1292–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x
- MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- Mantovan, M. C., Delazer, M., Ermani, M., & Denes, G. (1999). The breakdown of calculation procedures in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 35(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70783-4
- Marshall, G. A., Amariglio, R. E., Sperling, R. A., & Rentz, D. M. (2012). Activities of daily living: Where do they fit in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease? Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 2(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.12.55
- Marterer, A., Danielczyk, W., Simanyi, M., & Fischer, P. (1996). Calculation abilities in dementia of Alzheimer’s type and in vascular dementia. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4943(96)00720-0
- Maylor, E. A., Watson, D. G., & Muller, Z. (2005). Effects of Alzheimer’s disease on visual enumeration. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(3), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.3
- McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Jr, Kawas, C. H., … Mohs, R. C. (2011). The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 7(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
- Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
- Norris, J. E., Clayton, S., Gilmore, C., Inglis, M., & Castronovo, J. (2019). The measurement of approximate number system acuity across the lifespan is compromised by congruency effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818779020
- Norris, J. E., McGeown, W. J., Guerrini, C., & Castronovo, J. (2015). Aging and the number sense: Preserved basic non-symbolic numerical processing and enhanced basic symbolic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00999
- Nys, J., & Content, A. (2012). Judgement of discrete and continuous quantity in adults. Number Counts! Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.619661
- Opfer, J. E., & Martens, M. A. (2012). Learning without representational change: Development of numerical estimation in individuals with Williams syndrome. Developmental Science, 15, 863–875.
- Opfer, J. E., Siegler, R. S., & Young, C. J. (2011). The powers of noise‐fitting: Reply to Barth and Paladino. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1194–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01070.x
- Opfer, J. E., & Thompson, C. A. (2008). The trouble with transfer: Insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude. Child Dev., 79, 788–804. https://doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01158.x
- Parlato, V., Lopez, O. L., Panisset, M., Iavarone, A., Grafman, J., & Boller, F. (1992). Mental calculation in mild Alzheimer’s disease: A pilot study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 7(8), 599–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.930070810
- Perry, R. J., & Hodges, J. R. (1999). Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: A critical review. Brain, 122(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.3.383
- Pesenti, M., Seron, X., & Van Der Linden, M. (1994). Selective impairment as evidence for mental organisation of arithmetical facts: BB, a case of preserved subtraction? Cortex, 30(4), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80242-0
- Revkin, S. K., Piazza, M., Izard, V., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19(6), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02130.x
- Roquet, A., Hinault, T., & Lemaire, P. (2018). Aging and sequential strategy interference: A Magnetoencephalography study in arithmetic problem solving. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, 232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00232
- Roquet, A., & Lemaire, P. (2019). Strategy variability in numerosity comparison task: A study in young and older adults. Open Psychology, 1(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0011
- Seron, X., Deloche, G., Ferrand, I., Cornet, J. A., Frederix, M., & Hirsbrunner, T. (1991). Dot counting by brain damaged subjects. Brain and Cognition, 17(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(91)90072
- Siegel, A. W., Goldsmith, L. T., & Madson, C. R. (1982). Skill in estimation problems of extent and numerosity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/748557
- Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x
- Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02438
- Smets, K., Gebuis, T., Defever, E., & Reynvoet, B. (2014). Concurrent validity of approximate number sense tasks in adults and children. Acta psychologica, 150, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.001
- Smets, K., Sasanguie, D., Szücs, D., & Reynvoet, B. (2015). The effect of different methods to construct non-symbolic stimuli in numerosity estimation and comparison. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.996568
- Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(2), 461. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.461
- Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), 1345–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345
- Sullivan, J. L., Juhasz, B. J., Slattery, T. J., & Barth, H. C. (2011). Adults’ number-line estimation strategies: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0081-1
- Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2010). How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development, 81(6), 1768–1786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01509.x
- Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2016). Learning linear spatial-numeric associations improves accuracy of memory for numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00024
- Tse, C. S., Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Duchek, J. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2010). Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology, 24(3), 300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018274
- Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(4), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.467
- Van der Weijden, F. A., Kamphorst, E., Willemsen, R. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Hoogmoed, A. H. (2018). Strategy use on bounded and unbounded number lines in typically developing adults and adults with dyscalculia: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2363–8761. https://doi:10.5964/jnc.v4i2.115
- Vos, P., van Oeffelen, M. P., Tibosch, H. J., & Allik, J. (1988). Interaction between area and numerosity. Psychological Research, 50(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310175
- Wecker, N. S., Kramer, J. H., Wisniewski, A., Delis, D. C., & Kaplan, E. (2000). Age effects on executive ability. Neuropsychology, 14(3), 409. https://doi.org/10.1037//0894-4105.14.3.409
- Young, C. J., & Opfer, J. E. (2011). Psychophysics of numerical representation. Zeitschrift F€ur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000047