188
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Cross-validation of the Trail Making Test as a non-memory-based embedded performance validity test among veterans with and without cognitive impairment

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 16-24 | Received 27 Jul 2023, Accepted 20 Nov 2023, Published online: 25 Nov 2023

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013) . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Ashendorf, L., Clark, E. L., & Sugarman, M. A. (2017). Performance validity and processing speed in a VA polytrauma sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(5), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1285961
  • Ausloos-Lozano, J. E., Bing-Canar, H., Khan, H., Singh, P. G., Wisinger, A. M., Rauch, A. A., Ogram Buckley, C. M., Petry, L. G., Jennette, K. J., Soble, J. R., & Resch, Z. J. (2022). Assessing performance validity during attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations: Cross-validation of select non-memory embedded validity indicators. Developmental Neuropsychology, 47(5), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2022.2096889
  • Bailey, K. C., Soble, J. R., Bain, K. M., & Fullen, C. (2018). Embedded performance validity tests in the Hopkins verbal learning test—Revised and the brief visuospatial memory test—Revised: A replication study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(7), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx111
  • Bain, K. M., & Soble, J. R. (2019). Validation of the advanced Clinical solutions word choice test (WCT) in a mixed clinical sample: Establishing classification accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and cutoff scores. Assessment, 26(7), 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117725172
  • Bernstein, M. T., Resch, Z. J., Ovsiew, G. P., & Soble, J. R. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the advanced clinical solutions word choice test as a performance validity test. Neuropsychology Review, 31(2), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09468-y
  • Berthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A. P., Miller, L. J., & Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7–8), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.793400
  • Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802427803
  • Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology: An evidenced-based approach. Guilford Press.
  • Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Herzberg, D. S. (2002). The dot counting test manual. Western Psychological Services.
  • Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Wen, J. (2005). Comparison of various RAVLT scores in the detection of noncredible memory performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.08.001
  • Busse, M., & Whiteside, D. (2012). Detecting suboptimal cognitive effort: Classification accuracy of the conner’s continuous performance test-II, brief test of attention, and trail making test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.679623
  • Cohen, C. D., Rhoads, T., Keezer, R. D., Jennette, K. J., Williams, C. P., Hansen, N. D., Ovsiew, G. P., Resch, Z. J., & Soble, J. R. (2022). All of the accuracy in half of the time: Assessing abbreviated versions of the test of memory malingering in the context of verbal and visual memory impairment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(7), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1908596
  • Critchfield, E., Soble, J. R., Marceaux, J. C., Bain, K. M., Bailey, K. C., Webber, T. A., Alverson, W. A., Messerly, J., Gonzalez, D. A., & O’Rourke, J. J. F. (2019). Cognitive impairment does not cause performance validity failure: Analyzing performance patterns among unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(6), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1508615
  • Davis, J. J., & Millis, S. R. (2014). Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.884633
  • Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Philpott, L. M., & Hess, R. A. (2009). Dementia and effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701819050
  • Duering, M., Gesierich, B., Seiler, S., Pirpamer, L., Gonik, M., Hofer, E., Jouvent, E., Duchesnay, E., Chabriat, H., Ropele, S., Schmidt, R., & Dichgans, M. (2014). Strategic white matter tracts for processing speed deficits in age-related small vessel disease. Neurology, 82(22), 1946–1950. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000475
  • Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, M. J., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. (3rd ed.) John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jak, A. J., Bondi, M. W., Delano-Wood, L., Wierenga, C., Corey-Bloom, J., Salmon, D. P., & Delis, D. C. (2009). Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(5), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31819431d5
  • Jennette, K. J., Williams, C. P., Resch, Z. J., Ovsiew, G. P., Durkin, N. M., O’Rourke, J. J. F., Marceaux, J. C., Critchfield, E. C., & Soble, J. R. (2022). Assessment of differential neurocognitive performance based on the number of performance validity tests failures: A cross-validation study across multiple mixed clinical samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(7), 1915–1932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1900398
  • Kortte, K. B., Horner, M. D., & Windham, W. K. (2002). The trail making test, part B: Cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Applied Neuropsychology, 9(2), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5
  • Kraemer, L. D. R., Soble, J. R., Phillips, J. I., Webber, T. A., Fullen, C. T., Highsmith, J. M., Alverson, W. A., & Critchfield, E. C. (2020). Minimizing evaluation time while maintaining accuracy: Cross-validation of the test of memory malingering (TOMM) trial 1 and first 10-item errors as briefer performance validity tests. Psychological Assessment, 32(5), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000802
  • Lu, P. H., Rogers, S. A., & Boone, K. B. (2007). Use of standard memory tests to detect suspect effort. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 128–151). Guilford.
  • Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Olsen, D. H. (2022). Performance validity in the dementia clinic: Specificity of validity tests when used individually and in aggregate across levels of cognitive impairment severity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(1), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1778790
  • Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., Olsen, D. H., Maloy, H., Boettcher, A., Ernst, N., & Okut, H. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the test of memory malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 88–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1637027
  • Miele, A. S., Gunner, J. H., Lynch, J. K., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2012). Are embedded validity indices equivalent to free-standing symptom validity tests? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr084
  • Neale, A. C., Ovsiew, G. P., Resch, Z. J., & Soble, J. R. (2022). Feigning or forgetfulness: The effect of memory impairment severity on word choice test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(3), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1799076
  • Onandia-Hinchado, I., Pardo-Palenzuela, N., & Diaz-Orueta, U. (2021). Cognitive characterization of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder by domains: A systematic review. Journal of Neural Transmission, 128(7), 893–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02302-6
  • Ovsiew, G. P., Resch, Z. J., Nayar, K., Williams, C. P., & Soble, J. R. (2020). Not so fast! Limitations of processing speed and working memory indices as embedded performance validity tests in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(5), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1758635
  • Paredes, A. M., Carrasco, J., Kamalyan, L., Cherner, M., Umlauf, A., Rivera Mindt, M., Suarez, P., Fortuny, A. I., Franklin, L., Heaton, D., & Marquine, M. J. (2021). Demographically adjusted normative data for the Halstead category test in a Spanish-speaking adult population: Results from the Neuropsychological Norms for the U.S.-Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(2), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1709660
  • Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(1), 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.02.005
  • Rao, S. M., St Aubin-Faubert, P., & Leo, G. J. (1989). Information processing speed in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(4), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638908400907
  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead–Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical applications (2nd ed.). Neuropsychology Press.
  • Resch, Z. J., Webber, T. A., Bernstein, M. T., Rhoads, T., Ovsiew, G. P., & Soble, J. R. (2021). Victoria symptom validity test: A systematic review and cross-validation study. Neuropsychology Review, 31(2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09477-5
  • Rhoads, T., Neale, A. C., Resch, Z. J., Cohen, C. D., Keezer, R. D., Cerny, B. M., Jennette, K. J., Ovsiew, G. P., & Soble, J. R. (2021). Psychometric implications of failure on one performance validity test: A cross-validation study to inform criterion group definition. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 43(5), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2021.1945540
  • Rohling, M. L., Binder, L. M., Demakis, G. J., Larrabee, G. J., Ploetz, D. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of neuropsychological outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: Re-analyses and reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.565076
  • Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., Heinrichs, R. J., & Baade, L. E. (2019). Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1484517
  • Schroeder, R. W., Twumasi-Ankrah, P., Baade, L. E., & Marshall, P. S. (2012). Reliable digit span: A systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment, 19(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111428764
  • Sherman, E. M. S., Tan, J. E., & Hrabok, M. (2021). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Fundamentals of neuropsychological assessment and test reviews for clinical practice (4th Ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Shura, R. D., Miskey, H. M., Rowland, J. A., Yoash-Gantz, R. E., & Denning, J. H. (2016). Embedded performance validity measures with postdeployment veterans: Cross-validation and efficiency with multiple measures. Applied Neuropsychology Adult, 23(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1014556
  • Soble, J. R., Alverson, W. A., Phillips, J. I., Critchfield, E. A., Fullen, C., O’Rourke, J. J. F., Marceaux, J. M., Highsmith, J. M., Bailey, K. C., Webber, T. A., & Marceaux, J. C. (2020). Strength in numbers or quality over quantity? Examining the importance of criterion measure selection to define validity groups in performance validity test (PVT) research. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09370-w
  • Soble, J. R., Santos, O. A., Bain, K. M., Kirton, J. W., Bailey, K. C., Critchfield, E. A., O’Rourke, J. J. F., Highsmith, J. M., & Gonzalez, D. A. (2018). The dot counting test adds up: Validation and response pattern analysis in a mixed clinical veteran sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2017.1342773
  • Soble, J. R., Sharp, D. W., Carter, D. A., Jennette, K. J., Resch, Z. J., Ovsiew, G. P., & Critchfield, E. A. (2021). Cross-validation of a forced-choice validity indicator to enhance the clinical utility of the rey auditory verbal learning test. Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 568–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001018
  • Soble, J. R., Webber, T. A., & Bailey, K. C. (2021). An overview of common stand-alone and embedded PVTs for the practicing clinician: Cutoffs, classification accuracy, and administration times. In R. W. Schroeder & P. K. Martin (Eds.), Validity assessment in clinical neuropsychological practice: Evaluating and managing noncredible performance (pp. 126–149). Guilford.
  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & the Conference Participants. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
  • Webber, T. A., & Soble, J. R. (2018). Utility of various WAIS-IV digit span indices for identifying noncredible performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(4), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1415374
  • White, D. J., Korinek, D., Bernstein, M. T., Ovsiew, G. P., Resch, Z. J., & Soble, J. R. (2020). Cross-validation of non-memory-based embedded performance validity tests for detecting invalid performance among patients with and without neurocognitive impairment. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(5), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1758634

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.