Process models of verbal memory in cancer survivors: Bayesian process modeling approach to variation in test scores

References

• Aleman, A., Hijman, R., De Haan, E. H., & Kahn, R. S. (1999). Memory impairment in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(9), 1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.9.1358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, G. E., Satalich, T. A., Shankle, W. R., & Batchelder, W. H. (2016). A cognitive psychometric model for the psychodiagnostic assessment of memory-related deficits. Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 279. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, L. J., McCreath, G. A., Komeylian, Z., & Rich, J. B. (2017). Cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy depends on control group type and cognitive domains assessed: A multilevel meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilder, R. M., & Reise, S. P. (2019). Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J., Hara, J., Fortier, D., Lee, M., Petersen, R., Shankle, W., & ADNI. (2021). Application of digital cognitive biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: Identifying cognitive process changes and impending cognitive decline. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease, 8, 123–126. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, J. (1991). The Hopkins verbal learning test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 5(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049108403297
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, M. K., & Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov chain monte carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, P. K., Choi, S. E., Lee, M., Scollard, P., Sanders, R. E., Klinedinst, B., & Mukherjee, S. (2023). Measurement precision across cognitive domains in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) data set. Neuropsychology, 37(4), 373. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. (2000). California verbal learning test-II (research ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• de Valpine, P., Paciorek, C., Turek, D., Michaud, N., Anderson-Bergman, C., Obermeyer, F., & Paganin, S. (2022). NIMBLE: MCMC, particle filtering, and programmable hierarchical modeling [computer software manual]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=nimble ( R package version 0.13.1)
   Google Scholar
• de Valpine, P., Turek, D., Paciorek, C., Anderson-Bergman, C., Temple Lang, D., & Bodik, R. (2017). Programming with models: Writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with NIMBLE. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 26(2), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2016.1172487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, H. E., Murre, J. M., Vermeulen, I. E., Kieffer, J. M., & Schagen, S. B. (2018). Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam cognition scan. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2017.1339017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, H. E., Vermeulen, I. E., Murre, J. M., & Schagen, S. B. (2018). Online self-administered cognitive testing using the Amsterdam cognition scan: Establishing psychometric properties and normative data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5), e192. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graves, R. E., Bezeau, S. C., Fogarty, J., & Blair, R. (2004). Boston naming test short forms: A comparison of previous forms with new item response theory based forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26(7), 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490510716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grober, E., Hall, C. B., Lipton, R. B., Zonderman, A. B., Resnick, S. M., & Kawas, C. (2008). Memory impairment, executive dysfunction, and intellectual decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617708080302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, N., Kvam, P. D., & Turner, B. M. (2023). Explaining the description-experience gap in risky decision-making: Learning and memory retention during experience as causal mechanisms. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 23, 557–577. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-023-01099-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, N., Sullivan Toole, H., & Olino, T. (2023). From classical methods to generative models: Tackling the unreliability of neuroscientific measures in mental health research. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 8(8), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.01.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. D., Bock, J. R., Cushman, I., & Shankle, W. R. (2020). An application of multinomial processing tree models and bayesian methods to understanding memory impairment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 95, 102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring, D. W., Saurman, J. L., John, S. E., Bowden, S. C., Lah, J. J., & Goldstein, F. C. (2022). The Rey auditory verbal learning test: Cross-validation of Mayo Normative Studies (MNS) demographically corrected norms with confidence interval estimates. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617721000199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch, S. M., & Western, B. (2004). Bayesian posterior predictive checks for complex models. Sociological Methods & Research, 32(3), 301–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103257303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software manual]. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rey, A. (1958). L’examen clinique en psychologie [The psychological examination]. Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2022). Rstudio: Integrated development environment for R [computer software manual]. http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Schoenberg, M. R., Dawson, K. A., Duff, K., Patton, D., Scott, J. G., & Adams, R. L. (2006). Test performance and classification statistics for the Rey auditory verbal learning test in selected clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(7), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorgusen, S. R., Suchy, Y., Chelune, G. J., & Baucom, B. R. (2016). Neuropsychological practice effects in the context of cognitive decline: Contributions from learning and task novelty. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715001332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar