Development of a measure for assessing malingered incompetency in criminal proceedings: Denney competency related test (D-CRT)

References

• Acklin, M. W. (2012). The forensic clinician’s toolbox I: A review of competency to stand trial (CST) instruments. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(2), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627970
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ardolf, B. R., Denney, R. L., & Houston, C. M. (2007). Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(6), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580600966391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attix, D. K., Donders, J., Johnson-Greene, D., Grote, C. L., Harris, J. G., & Bauer, R. M. (2007). Disclosure of neuropsychological test data: Official position of division 40 (clinical neuropsychology) of the american psychological association, association of postdoctoral programs in clinical neuropsychology, and american academy of clinical neuropsychology. (clinical neuropsychology) of the american psychological association, association of postdoctoral programs in clinical neuropsychology, and american academy of clinical neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040601042928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K.W., & Glynn, G. G. (2005). On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal, 5(4), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binder, L. M., & Chafetz, M. D. (2018). Determination of the smoking gun of intent: Significance testing of forced choice results in social security claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1337931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, L. M., Larrabee, G. J., & Millis, S. R. (2014). Intent to fail: Significance testing of forced choice test results. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1366–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.978383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2007). A reconsideration of the slick et al. (1999). Criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 29–49). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (2000). Technical manual for the accuracy level test. Revrac Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, L. H., & Colwell, K. (2011). Assessing feigned cognitive impairment in defendants hospitalized for competency restoration: Further validation of the TOMI. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(4), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2011.562804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Colwell, L. H., Perry, A. T., Wasieleski, D., & Billings, T. (2008). The test of malingered incompetence (TOMI): A forced-choice instrument for assessing cognitive malingering in competence to stand trial evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 26(3), 17–42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234115496_TOMI_Further_Validation_Final_Revision_012711
   Google Scholar
• Cowden, V., & McKee, G. (1995). Competency to stand trial in juvenile delinquency proceedings: Cognitive maturity and the attorney-client relationship. University of Louisville Journal of Family Law, 33, 629–659. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/branlaj33&div=43&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Danzer, G. S., & Wasser, T. D. (2021, November). A literature analysis of the inventory of legal knowledge. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 49(1). Online. https://jaapl.org/content/early/2020/11/24/JAAPL.200042-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denney, R. L. (2008a). Evaluating competency to stand trial and sanity in the face of marked amnesia and claimed psychosis. In J. E. Morgan & J. J. Sweet (Eds.), Neuropsychology of Malingering Casebook (pp. 413–427). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Denney, R. L. (2008b). Negative response bias and malingering during neuropsychological assessment in criminal forensic settings. In R. L. Denney & J. P. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting (pp. 91–134). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denney, R. L. (2012). Criminal forensic neuropsychology and assessment of competency. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (2nd ed., pp. 438–472). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denney, R. L., & Fazio, R. L. (2021). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment in criminal forensic neuropsychological settings. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 656–688). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Everington, C. T., & Luckasson, R. (1992, 2022). Competence assessment for standing trial for defendants with intellectual disability (CAST*ID): Test manual. IDS Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, R. I., Crosby, R. D., & Wynkoop, T. F. (2000). Performance curve classification of invalid responding on the validity indicator profile. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/15.4.281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, R. I., & Foster, H. G., Jr. (1991). Multiple measures of malingereing on a forced-choice test of cognitive ability. Psychological Assessment, 3(4), 596–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.596
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, E., & Carbonell, J. (2014). The role of intelligence on performance on the inventory of legal knowledge (ILK). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(4), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.920900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2005). Green’s word memory test for windows: User’s manual (revis ed.). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2008). Green’s nonverbal medical symptom validity test: User’s manual. Green’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & Astner, K. (1995). Oral word memory test: User’s manual. Cognisyst.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., Rohling, M., Lees-Haley, & Allen, L. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15(12), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050110088254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., Lexcen, F., Reppucci, N. D., & Schwartz, R. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024065015717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, C. C., & Otto, R. K. (2010). Identifying persons feigning limitations in their competence to proceed in the legal process. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28(5), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, D. E. (2002). The unexamined lie is a lie worth fibbing: Neuropsychological malingering and the word memory test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(7), 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/17.7.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, W. L. (1973). Undefined (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S., & Conference Participants. (2009). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903155063
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Hawk, G., & Tate, D. C. (1996). Juvenile competence to stand trial: Research issues in practice. Law and Human Behavior, 20(5), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S., Kois, L. E., Peck, A. T., Elbogen, E. B., & LaDuke, C. (2023). The prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among people impacted by the criminal legal system: An updated meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 47(5), 539–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laboratory of Community Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (DHEW Publication No. ADM77–103).
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, A. L., Lelos, D., & Lipsitt, P. D. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness. U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, C., Crawford, S., & Evans, J. J. (2019). Effort testing in dementia assessment: A systematic review. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., B´edirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Of Directors, B., & Board of Directors. (2007). American academy of clinical neuropsychology (AACN) practice guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580601025932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, R. K., Musick, J. E., & Sherrod, C. B. (2010). Inventory of legal knowledge: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R. K., Musick, J. E., & Sherrod, C. B. (2011). Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competence to stand trial. Assessment, 18(1), 60–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110377162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankratz, L., & Erickson, R. C. (1990). Two views of malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049008401832
   Google Scholar
• Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R., Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., & Hoge, S. K. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool — criminal adjudication: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, A. (1958). L’examen clinique en psychologie [The psychological examination]. Presses Universitaries de France.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. A. (1998, March). Introducing the revised-CAI and assessment of trial competency — use of the revised-competency assessment instrument handbook. Presentation at American Psychology–Law Society Biennial Conference, Redondo Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R., Zapf, P., & Eaves, D. (2006). FIT-R: Fitness interview test — revised: A structured interview for assessing competency to stand trial. Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2007). Introduction. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Handbook of diagnostic and structured interviewing (pp. 1–19). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2018). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 18–41). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Robinson, E. V., & Henry, S. A. (2017). Feigned adjudicative incompetence: Testing effectiveness of the ILK and SAMA with jail detainees. Assessment, 24(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115605613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial–revised. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenzer, S. (2011). Review of the inventory of legal knowledge. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 70–81. https://www.oajfp.com/_files/ugd/166e3f_17e7e50774cb4b2e8b625f1832af30e1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S. P. (2011). In the twilight zone: Adolescent capacity in the criminal justices arena. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 17(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.108.006254
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky, J., & Karras, D. (1984). Competency to stand trial among adolescents. Adolescence, 14, 349–358. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6464817/
   Google Scholar
• Shipley, W., Gruber, C., Martin, T., & Klein, M. (2009). Shipley-2 professional manual. Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., Gildeh, N., & Holmes, C. (2007). The montreal cognitive assessment: Validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(5), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370705200508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Conference Participants. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35, 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). TOMM. test of memory malingering. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Trzepacz, P. T., Hochstetler, H., Wang, S., Walker, B., & Saykin, A. J. (2015). Relationship between the montreal cognitive assessment and mini-mental state examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0103-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl, K. D., Vitacco, M. J., Panza, N. R., & Hyde, T. F. (2018). Utility of the inventory of legal knowledge in detecting feigning. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(3), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1421249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, M. E., & Kivisto, A. J. (2017). The inventory of legal knowledge (ILK) and adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 8(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-10-2016-0018
   Google Scholar
• Wildman, R., Batchelor, E., Thompson, L., Nelson, F., Moore, J., Patterson, M., & Deloasa, M. (1980). The Georgia Court Competency Test: An Attempt to Develop a Rapid, Quantitative Measure for Fitness for Trial [ Unpublished manuscript]. Forensic Services Division, Central State Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Stafford, K. P., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2007). The relation between symptom validity testing and MMPI-2 scores as a function of forensic evaluation context. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynkoop, T. F., & Denney, R. L. (1999). Exaggeration of neuropsychological deficit in competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1(2), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v01n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Wynkoop, T. F., & Denney, R. L. (2005). Test review: Green’s word memory test (WMT) for windows. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(3), 101–105.
   Google Scholar