What's in a domain: understanding how students approach questioning in history and science

References

• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404. doi: 10.3102/00346543058004375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, R. (2005). “They thought the world was flat?” Applying the principles of how people learn in teaching high school history. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 179–215). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham, UK: SRHE & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. American psychologist, 41, 1078–1089. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485–522. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2007). Students’ adaptation of study strategies when preparing for classroom tests. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 401–428. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9025-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, M. T., Bishop, A. G., Gersten, R., Klinger, J. K., Penfield, R. D., Dimino, J., … Sindelar, P. T. (2009). The role of domain expertise in beginning special education teacher quality. Exceptional Children, 75, 391–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, L. (2006). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Journal of American History, 92, 1359–1370. doi: 10.2307/4485896
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Ed.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 17–39). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccio-Schirripa, S., & Steiner, E. H. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 210–224. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<210::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denney, D. R. (1975). Developmental changes in concept utilization among normal and retarded children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 359–368. doi: 10.1037/h0076600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 31–41. doi: 10.2307/1981643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G. (1995). Disciplinary differences in knowledge validation. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice (pp. 7–17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hindi, A. E. (2003). Integrating literacy and science in the classroom: From ecomysteries to readers theatre. The Reading Teacher, 56, 536–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A functional linguistic perspective. Science Education, 89, 335–347. doi: 10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children's knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 15–23. doi: 10.1080/016502500383421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 524–536.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104–137. doi: 10.3102/00028312031001104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, M. L., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Keil, F. C., & Gutierrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science, 17, 455–459.
   Google Scholar
• Grigg, W., Donahue, P., & Dion, G. (2007). The Nation’s Report Card [TM]: 12th-grade reading and mathematics 2005 (NCES 2007-468). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child, classification and seriation. (E. A. Lunzer & D. Papert, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children's knowledge construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127–148. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1993.9943857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). The representation of knowledge in minds and machines. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 411–420. doi: 10.1080/002075998400169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212–218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krigolson, O. E., Pierce, L. J., Holroyd, C. B., Tanaka, J. W., & Baijal, S. (2011). Learning to become an expert: Reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise. Annals of Neurosciences, 18, 113–114. doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.1118307
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M. (2008). On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 207–230. doi: 10.1080/09515080801980179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Science education for the future: Which way now? Primary Science Review, 52, 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. G., Soederberg Miller, L. M., Ridolfo, H. E., Magnor, C., Fischer, U. M., Kokayeff, N. K., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2008). Expertise and age difference in pilot decision making. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16, 33–55. doi: 10.1080/13825580802195641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, R. Y., & Singer, H. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement. The Reading Teacher, 39, 24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordell, S. E. (2009). Learning how to learn: A model for teaching students learning strategies. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 35(1), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001016
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on science students’ content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self-regulatory efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110, 382–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00050.x
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2010). Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind – Edited by Regan A. R. Gurung, Nancy L. Chick, and Aeron Haynie. Teaching Theology & Religion, 13, 286–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9647.2010.00631.x
   Google Scholar
• Schellings, G. (2011). Applying learning strategy questionnaires: Problems and possibilities. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 91–109. doi: 10.1007/s11409-011-9069-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 7–18. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 166–185. doi: 10.2307/747482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. M., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). Interactions between causal and statistical learning. In A. Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2006). Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 1–35. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19–41. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1986.9653022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106. doi: 10.3102/0002831209333183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 467–502. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, C. (2007). Researching and developing interdisciplinary teaching: Towards a conceptual framework for classroom communication. Higher Education, 54, 853–866. doi: 10.1007/s10734-006-9027-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar