Exploration of direct and indirect associations of system-level policy-amenable variables with reading literacy performance

References

• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. H. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on Achievement (CAHRS Working Paper Series). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1142&context=cahrswp
   Google Scholar
• Bosker, R. J., & Scheerens, J. (1994) Alternative models of educational effectiveness put to the test. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 159–180. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(94)90030-2
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., Elmore, R., & Siskin, L. (Eds.). (2003). The new accountability. High schools and high-stakes testing. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London, UK: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Improving quality in education. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X019001003
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F., & Associates. (1990). Restructuring school: The next generation of educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. (1972). The many faces of “educational accountability”. Phi Delta Kappan, 53, 636–639.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying school leadership effects as a reciprocal process. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 149–173. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2011.565777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2009). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation (NBER Working Paper, No. 14633). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, R., & Tymms, P. (2004).The effects of student composition on school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 177–200. doi: 10.1076/sesi.15.2.177.30432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. (2006). Using international comparative studies to develop the theoretical framework of educational effectiveness research: A secondary analysis of TIMSS 1999 data. Educational Research and Evaluation. 12, 513–534. doi: 10.1080/13803610600873986
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Structural equation modelling: A Bayesian approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M. (2006). Why is educational entrepreneurship so difficult? Retrieved from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Schenker, N. (1995). Missing data. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 39–75). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009). The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3049–3067. doi: 10.1002/sim.3680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. (1998). Finding keys to school change: A 40-year odyssey. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. W. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 37–69). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/social_sector/latest_thinking/worlds_most_improved_schools
   Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). The importance of identifying levels in multilevel analyses: An illustration of the effects of ignoring the top or intermediate levels in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 103–130. doi: 10.1076/0924-3453(200006)11:2;1-Q;FT165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010a). Education at a glance. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010b). The high costs of low performance. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010c). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices(Volume IV). Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010d). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2013). What is effective schooling. A review of current thought and practice. Washington, DC: International Baccalaureate Organization. Retrieved from http://www.ibo.org/globalassets/publications/ib-research/whatiseffectiveschoolingfinal-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2014). School, teaching, and system effectiveness: Some comments on three state-of-the-art reviews. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 282–290. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2014.885453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2015). Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26, 10–31. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2013.858754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., & Van Ravens, J. (2011). Perspectives on educational quality. Illustrative outcomes on primary and secondary schooling in the Netherlands. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management. Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Wildy, H. (2014). The progress of pupils in their first school year across classes and educational systems. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/berj.3156
   Google Scholar
• Van Amelsvoort, H. W. C. H., & Scheerens, J. (1997). Policy issues surrounding processes of centralization and decentralization in European education systems. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3, 340–363. doi: 10.1080/1380361970030404
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., &Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294. doi: 10.3102/00346543063003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Woessmann, L., Luedemann, E., Schuetz, G., & West, M. R. (2009). School accountability, autonomy and choice around the world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar