Student teachers’ and in-service teachers’ peer learning: a realist synthesis

References

• References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland, R. (1991). A review of the peer coaching literature. Journal of Staff Development, 12(1), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• *Amhag, L., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Collaborative learning as a collective competence when students use the potential of meaning in asynchronous dialogues. Computers & Education, 52(3), 656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Amobi, F. A. (2005). Preservice teachers’ reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• *An, H., Kim, S., & Kim, B. (2008). Teacher perspectives on online collaborative learning: Factors perceived as facilitating and impeding successful online group work. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(1), 65–83. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/volume-8/issue-1-08/general/teacher-perspectives-on-online-collaborative-learning-factors-perceived-as-facilitating-and-impeding-successful-online-group-work
   Google Scholar
• An, H., & Shin, S., & Lim, K. (2009). The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students’ interactions during asynchronous online discussions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 749–760. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 133–158. doi: 10.1007/s11412-007-9013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Baran, B., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). The dynamics of online communities in the activity theory framework. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Biasutti, M. (2011). The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1865–1875. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkhorst, F., Poortman, C. L., McKenney, S. E., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2018). Revealing the balancing act of vertical and shared leadership in Teacher Design Teams. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2011). Meeting the challenges of scale: The importance of preparing professional development leaders. Teachers College Record. http://www.tcrecord.org (ID Number: 16358)
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Examining novice teacher leaders’ facilitation of mathematics professional development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 149–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.003
   Google Scholar
• *Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., & Cumbo, K. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(3), 259–278. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00024-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bower, M., Cavanagh, M., Moloney, R., & Dao, M. (2011). Developing communication competence using an online Video Reflection system: Pre-service teachers’ experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 311–326. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2011.614685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2003). Using video in teacher education (Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• *Buchanan, M. T. (2011). Peer reviewing preservice teachers of Christian higher education. Christian Higher Education, 10(5), 464–481. doi: 10.1080/15363759.2010.515455
   Google Scholar
• *Buchanan, M. T., & Stern, J. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the benefits of peer review. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(1), 37–49. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2012.643654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Burron, B., James, M. L., & Ambrosio, A. L. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning in a physical science course for elementary/middle level preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 697–707. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660300708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo, C., Maasen van den Brink, H., & Groot, W. (2016). Professional development programs and their effects on student achievement: A systematic review of evidence (TIER Working Paper No. 16/03). Maastricht: TIER, Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• *Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2012). Collaborative peer video analysis: Insights about literacy assessment and instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 171–199. doi: 10.1177/1086296X12440429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Clarke, M. (2009). The discursive construction of interpersonal relations in an online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2333–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenders, F., & Verhoef, N. (2018). Lesson Study: Professional development (PD) for beginning and experienced teachers. Professional Development in Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1430050
   Google Scholar
• Dalkin, S. (2014). The realist evaluation of a palliative integrated care pathway in primary care: What works, for whom and in what circumstances? (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/18251/
   Google Scholar
• Dalkin, S., Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B., & Lhussier, M. (2015). What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science, 10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., Bolivar, J. M., & Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359–391. doi: 10.1108/09578231011041062
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNeve, D., & Devos, G. (2016). The role of environmental factors in beginning teachers’ professional learning related to differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(4), 357–379. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1122637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNeve, D., & Devos, G. (2017). How do professional learning communities aid and hamper professional learning of beginning teachers related to differentiated instruction? Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 262–283. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1206524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNeve, D., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M. S. R., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. doi: 10.1080/03075079912331379935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Donnelly, A. M. (2005). Let me show you my portfolio! Demonstrating competence through peer interviews. Action in Teacher Education, 27(3), 55–63. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2005.10463390
   Google Scholar
• *El-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Engelen, A., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2002). Op zoek naar factoren die van coaching een krachtige leeromgeving voor docenten maken [Indicators of successful peer coaching in powerful learning environments]. Pedagogische Studiën, 79(4), 305–321.
   Google Scholar
• *Estebaranz, A., Mingorance, P., & Marcelo, C. (1999). Teachers’ work groups as professional development: What do the teachers learn? Teachers and Teaching, 5(2), 153–169. doi: 10.1080/1354060990050202
   Google Scholar
• *Eteläpelto, A., Littleton, K., Lahti, J., & Wirtanen, S. (2005). Students’ accounts of their participation in an intensive long-term learning community. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 183–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.011
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. T., Kreijns, K., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Gerrichhauzen, J. T. G. (2011). An organizational and task perspective model aimed at enhancing teachers’ professional development and occupational expertise. Human Resource Development Review, 10(2), 151–179. doi: 10.1177/1534484310397852
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Forbes, C. T. (2004). Peer mentoring in the development of beginning secondary science teachers: Three case studies. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(2), 219–239. doi: 10.1080/1361126042000239956
   Google Scholar
• *Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1103–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fry, J. M., & Hin, M. K. T. (2006). Peer coaching with interactive wireless technology between student teachers: Satisfaction with role and communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 193–204. doi: 10.1080/10494820600852969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Goos, M. E., & Bennison, A. (2008). Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: Emergence of an online community of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(1), 41–60. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9061-9
   Google Scholar
• *Grion, V., & Varisco, B. M. (2007). On line collaboration for building a teacher professional identity. PsychNology Journal, 5(3), 271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, M., & Jopling, M. (2016). Problematizing lesson study and its impacts: Studying a highly contextualized approach to professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 203–214. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hamilton, E. R. (2013). His ideas are in my head: Peer-to-peer teacher observations as professional development. Professional Development in Education, 39(1), 42–64. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.726202
   Google Scholar
• *Hanewald, R., & Gesthuizen, R. (2009). Sustainability in an online community of practice: The case study of a group of secondary school educators in Victoria. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(5), 26–42. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2009v34n5.3
   Google Scholar
• *Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884–1892. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Harrington, H. L., & Hathaway, R. S. (1994). Computer conferencing, critical reflection, and teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 543–554. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Harrington, H. L., & Quinn-Leering, K. (1996). Considering teaching’s consequences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 591–607. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Helleve, I. (2007). In an ICT-based teacher-education context: Why was our group “the magic group”? European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3), 267–284. doi: 10.1080/02619760701486118
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007). Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 573–595. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9049-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89–112. doi: 10.2190/EC.43.1.f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huang, K., Lubin, I. A., & Ge, X. (2011). Situated learning in an educational technology course for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1200–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hurme, T.-R., Merenluoto, K., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Socially shared metacognition of pre-service primary teachers in a computer-supported mathematics course and their feelings of task difficulty: A case study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 503–524. doi: 10.1080/13803610903444659
   Google Scholar
• *Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 463–481. doi: 10.1348/000709909X402811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Jenkins, J. M., Garn, A., & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(1), 2–23. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.24.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jenkins, J. M., & Veal, M. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 49–68. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.22.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. C., Shipman, S. A., & Ogrinc, G. (2014). Key characteristics of successful quality improvement curricula in physician education: A realist review. BMJ Quality and Safety, 24(1), 77–88. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintz, T., Lane, J., Gotwals, A., & Cisterna, D. (2015). Professional development at the local level: Necessary and sufficient conditions for critical colleagueship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 121–136.doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Koc, M. (2011). Let’s make a movie: Investigating pre-service teachers’ reflections on using video-recorded role playing cases in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lamb, P., Lane, K., & Aldous, D. (2013). Enhancing the spaces of reflection: A buddy peer-review process within physical education initial teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 19(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1177/1356336X12457293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, P. A., Christopher, D. E., Firpo-Triplett, R., & Buchting, F. (2014). The impact of short-term professional development on participant outcomes: A review of the literature. Professional Development in Education, 40(2), 207–227. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2013.776619
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, H.-J., & Baek, E. (2012). Facilitating deep learning in a learning community. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 8(1), 1–13. doi: 10.4018/jthi.2012010101
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lockhorst, D., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2010). CSCL in teacher training: What learning tasks lead to collaboration? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(1), 63–78. doi: 10.1080/14759390903579190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H.-L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 748–753. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Main, K. (2012). Effective middle school teacher teams: A ternary model of interdependency rather than a catch phrase. Teachers and Teaching, 18(1), 75–88. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2011.622556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mallette, B., Maheady, L., & Harper, G. F. (1999). The effects of reciprocal peer coaching on preservice general educators’ instruction of students with special learning needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(4), 201–216. doi: 10.1177/088840649902200402
   Google Scholar
• *Manouchehri, A. (2001). Collegial interaction and reflective practice. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 86–97. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2001.10463032
   Google Scholar
• *Matthew, K. I., Felvegi, E., & Callaway, R. A. (2009). Wiki as a collaborative learning tool in a language arts methods class. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 51–72. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782541
   Google Scholar
• *Meirink, J. A. (2007). Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in teams (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiteit Leiden, Leiden , The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• *Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.481256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching, 13(2), 145–164. doi: 10.1080/13540600601152496
   Google Scholar
• *Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009). How do teachers learn in the workplace? An examination of teacher learning activities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 209–224. doi: 10.1080/02619760802624096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2009). Fostering online social construction of science knowledge with primary pre-service teachers working in virtual teams. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 379–398. doi: 10.1080/13598660903050336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Olson, J. K. (2007). Preservice teachers’ thinking within a research-based framework: What informs decisions? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 49–83. doi: 10.1007/s10763-005-9027-2
   Google Scholar
• *Pachler, N., & Daly, C. (2006). Professional teacher learning in virtual environments. E-Learning, 3(1), 62–74. doi: 10.2304/elea.2006.3.1.62
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: The promise of “realist synthesis”. Evaluation, 8(3), 340–358. doi: 10.1177/135638902401462448
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K., (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction (RMP Methods Paper No. 2/2004). Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review – A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1_suppl), 21–34. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penuel, W., Riel, M., Krause, A., & Frank, K. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 124–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. (2009). Teachers’ talk in professional development activity that supports change in their ICT pedagogical beliefs and practices. Teacher Development, 13(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1080/13664530902858493
   Google Scholar
• Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Decuyper, S., Van den Bossche, P., & Dochy, F. (2015). An exploratory study of group development and team learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(1), 5–30. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ritchie, G., & Peters, S. (2001). Using narratives in conferences to improve the CMC learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 376–385. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00194.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rock, T. C., & Wilson, C. (2005). Improving teaching through lesson study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• *Ross, J. A. (1996). The influence of computer communication skills on participation in a computer conferencing course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(1), 37–52. doi: 10.2190/6TYW-ADV1-W0LC-N9H0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Roychoudhury, A., & Roth, W.-M. (1992). Student involvement in learning: Collaboration in science for preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(2), 47–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02614739
   Google Scholar
• *Ruan, J., & Beach, S. A. (2005). Using online peer dialogue journaling to promote reflection in elementary preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 27(3), 64–75. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2005.10463391
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Marlone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., . . . Wilson, V. (2012). Realist synthesis: Illustrating the method for implementation research. Implementation Science, 7:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-33
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. doi: 10.1177/1046496405277134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD. doi: 10.1787/9789264252059-en
   Google Scholar
• *Schuck, S. (2003). The use of electronic question and answer forums in mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 5, 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• *Shin, E.-K., Wilkins, E. A., & Ainsworth, J. (2007). The nature and effectiveness of peer feedback during an early clinical experience in an elementary education program. Action in Teacher Education, 28(4), 40–52. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2007.10463428
   Google Scholar
• Showers, B, & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shriki, A., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2011). Nurturing a community of practice through a collaborative design of lesson plans on a wiki system. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 339–357.
   Google Scholar
• *Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. L. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 59–78. doi: 10.1080/1470329032000172720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *So, W. W. (2012). Quality of learning outcomes in an online video-based learning community: Potential and challenges for student teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 143–158. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2012.669828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *So, W. W., Hung, V. H., & Yip, W. Y. (2008). The digital video database: A virtual learning community for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 73–90. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thijs, A., & Van den Berg, E. (2002). Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teachers in Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(1), 55–68. doi: 10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00078-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., & Den Brok, P. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: A meta-study. Educational Review, 69(5), 554–576. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2017.1281226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471. doi: 10.3102/0034654314557949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. doi: 10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521. doi: 10.1177/1046496406292938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy & K. Van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vincent, J., & Jones, A. (2008). Using models for understanding pedagogical change in a technology environment: A case study of IWB implementation in a secondary school. Australian Educational Computing, 23(2), 32–37. Retrieved from http://acce.edu.au/journal/23/2/using-models-understanding-pedagogical-change-technology-32-environment-case-study-iwb-
   Google Scholar
• *Wade, S. E., & Fauske, J. R. (2004). Dialogue online: Prospective teachers’ discourse strategies in computer-mediated discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 134–160. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. (2015). Contrived collegiality versus genuine collegiality: Demystifying professional learning communities in Chinese schools. Compare, 45(6), 908–930. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2014.952953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wilkins, E. A., Shin, E.-K., & Ainsworth, J. (2009). The effects of peer feedback practices with elementary education teacher candidates. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses. BMC Medicine, 11:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Westhorp, G., Pawson, R., & Greenhalgh, T. (2013). Realist synthesis: RAMESES training materials. Retrieved from http://www.ramesesproject.org/media/Realist_reviews_training_materials.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, Th., Bolhuis, S., & Bergen, Th. C. M. (2008). Teacher learning through reciprocal peer coaching: An analysis of activity sequences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 982–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar