Understanding Dutch students’ subject choices in secondary education using the Theory of Planned Behavior

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (1st ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekema, A. F., & Habraken, A. M. J. (2012). Wat zal ik kiezen? Een onderzoek naar de overwegingen die een rol spelen bij het kiezen van een profiel in de derde klas [Masters’ thesis]. Downloaded on 9 April 2020, from http://www.dspace.library.uu.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of Fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. (2016). Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour Model to Investigate Students’ Intentions to Enroll in University [Doctoral Dissertation]. Melbourne: RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Diederen, K. J. T., Van Helden, R., van Rossem, L., & Wanningen, S. D. W. M. (2012). De interpersoonlijke relatie tussen de bèta-docent en leerling en de keuze voor het profiel en de keuzevakken [Masters’ thesis]. University of Utrecht, Centrum voor Onderwijs en Leren. Downloaded on 9 April 2020, from: http://www.dspace.library.uu.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, W., & Topping, K. (2022). The relationship of deprivation and gender to perception of barriers, optimism and attachment during the postsecondary transition. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 20(58), 561–590. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v20i58.5261
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. L., & Sanders, M. G. (2002). Family, school, and community partnerships. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Vol. 5: Practical issues in parenting (pp. 407–437). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A. E., Grimshaw, J. M., Foy, R., Kaner, E. F. S., Smith, L., & Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Freeney, Y., & O’Connell, M. (2012). The predictors of the intention to leave school early among a representative sample of Irish second-level students. British Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.563838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gati, I., Krausz, M., & Osipow, S. H. (1996). A taxonomy of difficulties in career decision making. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2008). Is science a middle-class phenomenon? The SES determinants of 16–19 participation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740802141345
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hipkins, R., & Vaughan, K. (2019). Subject Choice for the future work: Insights from research literature. New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/NZC_NZCP%20-%20Research%20Literature%20Report.FINAL_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannelli, C., & Duta, A. (2018). Inequalities in school leavers’ labour market outcomes: Do school subject choices matter? Oxford Review of Education, 44(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1409970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2017). Ibm SPSS statistics for windows, version 25.0. IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, D., Curtis, D. D., & Conner, L. N. (2020). Student factors influencing STEM subject choice in year 12: A structural equation model using PISA/LSAY Data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09972-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H. (2010). Search for science talent in the Netherlands [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Groningen, Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., Bosker, R. J., & Van der Werf, G. (2013). Students leaving the STEM pipeline: An investigation of their attitudes and the influence of significant others on their study choice. Research Papers in Education, 28(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.698299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufteros, X., Babbar, S., & Kaighobadi, M. (2009). A paradigm for examining second-order factor models employing structural equation modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(2), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larose, S., Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Harvey, M. (2006). Trajectories of science self-efficacy beliefs during the college transition and academic and vocational adjustment in science and technology programs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765836
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. (2011). Introduction to the practice of statistics (7th ed). W. H. Freeman & Co Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Onderwijs in cijfers. (2021). Profielen in het vo. Consulted on 20 August 2021 at https://www.onderwijsincijfers.nl/kengetallen/vo/leerlingen-vo/vakken–profielen-profielen-vo.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, L., Care, E., & Ainley, M. (2011). The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy, and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710382615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics. (2005). Qualtrics XM, Version 2020. Qualtrics.
   Google Scholar
• Rekers-Mombarg, L., Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & Van der Werf, M. (2010). Van studiehuis naar studentenhuis, de studeer-, werk- en persoonlijke situatie van havo- en vwo eindexamen leerlingen. GION, Gronings Instituut voor Onderzoek van Onderwijs, Opvoeding en Ontwikkeling, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. (2019). Regeling aanmelding en toelating hoger onderwijs. Consulted on 20 August 2021 at https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0035059/2019-09-01#Aanhef.
   Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50(11/12), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, H., Knappstein, M., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Kabst, R. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224(3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. C. (2015). Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand students’ subject choices in post-compulsory education. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.880732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lange, A., & Vierke, H. (2009). Wat bepaalt de keuze voor een natuurprofiel? De invloed van de leerling, de school, de ouders en de peergroup. Platform Bèta Techniek.
   Google Scholar
• Van Langen, A. (2005). Unequal participation in mathematics and science education. ITS.
   Google Scholar
• Van Langen, A., Rekers-Mombarg, L., & Dekkers, H. (2006). Exact kiezen na de invoering van profielen in havo en vwo. Pedagogische Studiën, 83(2), 122–138.
   Google Scholar
• Yonezawa, S. (2000). Unpacking the black box of tracking decisions: Critical tales of families navigating the course of placement process. In M. G. Sanders (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 109–140). Erlbau.
   Google Scholar