Is replication possible in qualitative research? A response to Makel et al. (2022)

References

• Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., de Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., Fiedler, S., Funder, D. C., Kliegl, R., Nosek, B. A., Perugini, M., Roberts, B. W., Schmitt, M., van Aken, M. A. G., Weber, H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 607–622). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-038.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., Grange, J. A., Perugini, M., Spies, J. R., & Van't Veer, A. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branney, P. E., Brooks, J., Kilby, L., Newman, K., Norris, E., Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Treharne, G. J., & Whitaker, C. M. (2023). Three steps to open science for qualitative research in psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17, e12728. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. F. (2022). Replication studies: An essay in praise of ground-up conceptual replications in the science of learning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(1-2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.2022308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307306927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V. (2021). Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer? A review essay of the book Reporting Qualitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards, Revised Edition, by Heidi M. Levitt. American Psychological Association. 2020, 173pp., $29.99 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1-4338-3343-4.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2008). Working with pluralism: Determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108315858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, B., & Cornelissen, J. (2020). Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 1094428120937786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, M. K., Pownall, M., & Govaart, G. H. (2022). Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner’s guide. PsyArXiv. [preprint].
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., Langley, A., & Nigam, A. (2021). Navigating the tensions of quality in qualitative research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020985094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, J. B., Douglass, T., Benwell, B., Rhys, C. S., Parry, R., Simmons, R., & Kerrison, A. (2022). Should we share qualitative data? Epistemological and practical insights from conversation analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. In M. M. Mark, & L. Shotland (Eds.), New directions in program evaluation (pp. 57–75). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denizen, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn, pp. 191–216). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., Meyer, M. S., Simonsen, M. A., Roberts, A. M., & Plucker, J. A. (2022). Replication is relevant to qualitative research. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(1-2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.2022310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Kilby, L., & Branney, P. (2023). Opportunities, challenges and tensions: Open science through a lens of qualitative social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(4), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., Kaplan, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). Editorial essay: The tumult over transparency: Decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed, pp. 959–978). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2021). Is replication relevant for qualitative research? Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000217
   Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O'Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar