Does study counselling foster STEM intentions and reduce the STEM gender gap? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial

References

• Barone, C. (2011). Some things never change. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711402099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, C., & Assirelli, G. (2020). Gender segregation in higher education: An empirical test of seven explanations. Higher Education, 79(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00396-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, C., Schizzerotto, A., Assirelli, G., & Abbiati, G. (2019). Nudging gender desegregation: A field experiment on the causal effect of information barriers on gender inequalities in higher education. European Societies, 21(1), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1442929
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J. (2021). Gendered career expectations in context: The relevance of normative and comparative reference groups. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(7), 968–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1914547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S. (2016). Der Übergang von der Schule in die Hochschule: Empirische Erkenntnisse zu mathematikbezogenen Studiengängen. In A. Hoppenbrock, R. Biehler, R. Hochmuth, & H.-G. Rück (Eds.), Konzepte und Studien zur Hochschuldidaktik und Lehrerbildung Mathematik. Lehren und Lernen von Mathematik in der Studieneingangsphase: Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze (1st ed., pp. 3–13). Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10261-6_1.
   Google Scholar
• Borgen, N. T., & Mastekaasa, A. (2018). Horizontal stratification of higher education: The relative importance of field of study, institution, and department for candidates’ wages. Social Forces, 97(2), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P., Mangan, J., Hughes, A., & Slack, K. (2013). Labour market motivation and undergraduates’ choice of degree subject. British Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.646239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destatis. (2019). Genesis-online datenbank: studierende: Deutschland, semester, nationalität, geschlecht, studienfach. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online/data;sid=4E99294813B9C28601324B33819E6535.GO_2_1?operation=ergebnistabelleUmfang&levelindex=3&levelid=1569830665884&downloadname=21311-0003
   Google Scholar
• Donohoe, C., Topping, K., & Hannah, E. (2012). The impact of an online intervention (Brainology) on the mindset and resiliency of secondary school pupils: A preliminary mixed methods study. Educational Psychology, 32(5), 641–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2011). Understanding women’s achievement choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office. (2018). Education and Culture. Students in Tertiary Education. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/Publikationen/Downloads-Hochschulen/studierende-hochschulen-endg-2110410197004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Finger, C., Solga, H., Ehlert, M., & Rusconi, A. (2020). Gender differences in the choice of field of study and the relevance of income information. Insights from a field experiment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 65, 100457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Häfner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlke, A., Hachmeister, C.-D., & Hüning, L. (2019). Der CHE Numerus Clausus-Check 2019/20. Eine Analyse des Anteils von NC-Studiengängen in den einzelnen Bundesländern. CHE AP223. Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung gGmbH (CHE Arbeitspapier).
   Google Scholar
• Glass, J. L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2013). What’s so special about stem? A comparison of women's retention in stem and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görlitz, K., & Gravert, C. (2018). The effects of a high school curriculum reform on university enrollment and the choice of college major. Education Economics, 26(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1426731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund, A. E., & Lörz, M. (2020). Warum wählen männer und frauen unterschiedliche studienfächer? Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 49(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0005
   Google Scholar
• Herbaut, E., & Barone, C. (2021). Explaining gender segregation in higher education: Longitudinal evidence on the French case. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(2), 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1875199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschulrektorenkonferenz HRK (Hg. (2019). Statistiken zur Hochschulpolitik; 2/2019. Studiengänge, Studierende, Absolventinnen und Absolventen. Berlin. ISBN 978-3-942600-82-8.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., & Klein, M. (2019). Social origin, field of study and graduates’ career progression: Does social inequality vary across fields?. The British Journal of Sociology, 70, 1850–1873. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, Y., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2008). Comparing the impacts of tutorial and edutainment software programs on students’ achievements, misconceptions, and attitudes towards biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9077-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. P., Pekkarinen, T., Sarvimäki, M., & Uusitalo, R. (2015). Post-secondary education and information on labor market prospects: A randomized field experiment. (IZA Discussion Paper, No. 9372.). Bonn. IZA. http://ftp.iza.org/dp9372.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-K., & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of science–technology–society teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1315–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600972974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2012). School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412440802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R. (2020). Do family privileges bring gender equality? Instrumentalism and (de) stereotyping of stem career aspiration among Chinese adolescents. Social Forces, 99(2), 230–254. Article soz137, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz137
   Google Scholar
• MAGS. (2022). Kein Abschlus ohne Anschluss - ÜbergangSchule-Beruf NRW. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://www.mags.nrw/uebergang-schule-beruf-startseite
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, A. (2016). The role of cultural contexts in explaining cross-national gender gaps in stem expectations. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S.-J. (2015). Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., Gelbgiser, D., & Weeden, K. A. (2013). Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection. Social Science Research, 42(4), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsenfeld, F. (2016). Preferences, constraints, and the process of sex segregation in college majors: A choice analysis. Social Science Research, 56, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Felkner, L., Nix, S., & Thomas, K. (2017). Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepenburg, J., & Fervers, L. (2022). Do students need more information to leave the beaten paths? The impact of a counseling intervention on high school students’ choice of major. Higher Education, 84(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00770-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrzyk, I., & Erdmann, M. (2020). Investigating the impact of interventions on educational disparities: Estimating average treatment effects (ates) is not sufficient. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 65, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasničák, R. (2007). Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8
   Google Scholar
• Quadlin, N. (2017). Funding sources, family income, and fields of study in college. Social Forces, 96(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6)1048–1073. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211435229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ stem preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), 909–914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607386114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon, I., & Heckhausen, J. (2019). Conceptualizing individual agency in the transition from school to work: A social-ecological developmental perspective. Adolescent Research Review, 4, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2002). Teenage aspirations for future careers and occupational outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 262–288. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, E., Shen, Y., & Alfaro, E. C. (2019). Adolescents’ beliefs about math ability and their relations to stem career attainment: Joint consideration of race/ethnicity and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0911-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). Students’ intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics: The importance of how good you think you are. British Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 462–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2011). Women into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education stem subjects. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.515019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. (2009). Academic self-concept, gender and single-sex schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, R. (2006). The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.2190/3QTU-6EEL-HQHF-XYF0
   Google Scholar
• van den Hurk, A., Meelissen, M., & van Langen, A. (2019). Interventions in education to prevent stem pipeline leakage. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, T. J., Seymour, E., Koch, A. K., & Drake, B. M. (2019). Weed-out classes and their consequences. In E. Seymour, & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate stem education (1st ed., pp. 197–243). Springer International Publishing; Imprint: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_7
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar