What factors explain the differences in morbidity estimations among general practice registration networks in the Netherlands? A first analysis

References

• Hoogenveen R, Westert G, Dijkgraaf M, Schellevis F, de Bakker D. Disease prevalence estimations based on contact registrations in general practice. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2271–85
   Google Scholar
• van Weel C, Weel Baumgarten van E, Mold J. The importance of longitudinal studies in family medicine: experiences of two practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 69–74
   Google Scholar
• Fleming DM, Schellevis FG, Van Casteren V. The prevalence of known diabetes in eight European countries. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 10–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Weel C. Longitudinal research and data collection in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2005;3 Suppl 1:S46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Okkes IM, Polderman GO, Fryer GE, Yamada T, Bujak M, Oskam SK, et al. The role of family practice in different health care systems. A comparison of reasons for encounter, diagnoses and interventions in primary care populations in the Netherlands, Japan, Poland and the United States. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 72–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsemakers JF, Knottnerus JA, van Schendel GJ, Kocken RJ, Limonard CB. Unlocking patients’ records in general practice for research, medical education and quality assurance: the Registration Network Family Practices. Int J Biomed Comput 1996; 42: 43–50
   Google Scholar
• Verheij RA, van der Zee J. Chapter 30. Collecting information in general practice: ‘just by pressing a single button?. Morbidity, performance and quality in primary care Dutch general practice on stage, GP Westert, L Jabaaij, FG Schellevis. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford 2006; 265–72
   Google Scholar
• Oliemans AP. Morbiditeit in de huisartspraktijk. Stenfert Kroese, Leiden 1969; 1–257
   Google Scholar
• van Weel C. Validating long term morbidity recording. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995; 49 Suppl 1: 29–32
   Google Scholar
• de Jongh H, Kole H, Metsemakers JFM, Peerden H, Smit C, Stroucken J, et al. Richtlijn adequate dossiervorming met het Elektronisch Medisch Dossier. NHG-Publicatie automatisering. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Urecht 2004
   Google Scholar
• Majeed A. Sources, uses, strengths and limitations of data collected in primary care in England. Health Stat Q 2004; 21: 5–14
   Google Scholar
• Hart HE, van der Wouden JC, Hoppener P, van Schendel GJ, Knottnerus JA. General practice registration networks in the Netherlands: a brief report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6: 173–5
   Google Scholar
• Gijsen R, Poos R. Using registries in general practice to estimate countrywide morbidity in The Netherlands. Public Health 2006; 120: 923–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poos MJJC, Gijsen R. Reumatoide arthritis. Omvang van het probleem. Achtergronden en details bij cijfers uit huisartsregistraties. National Public Health Compass (Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid), part of the Dutch Public Health Status and Forecasts, version 3.11.1 Bilthoven: RIVM; 8 November, 2007. URL: www.nationaalkompas.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Marinus AMF. Inter-doktervariatie in de huisartspraktijk. S.n. 1993. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, Schellevis FG, Spreeuwenberg P, van de Lisdonk EH. Changes in patients’ attitudes towards the management of minor ailments. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 516–21
   Google Scholar
• Huisartsenzorg. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationale Atlas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM, ( www.zorgatlas.nl) versie 3.13; 17 April, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Plat AW, te Wierik MJ, Kroon AA, Schouten HJ, van den Akker M, van Schayck CP, et al. Regional differences in cardiovascular risk factor profile cannot fully explain differences in cardiovascular morbidity in the Netherlands: a comparison of two urban areas. Neth J Med 2005; 63: 309–15
   Google Scholar
• Schellevis F, Westert G, de Bakker D, Foets M, vd Velden J. Kritisch lezen van informatie uit grote registratiebestanden. Huisarts Wet 1999; 42: 591–601
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer V, de Waal MWM, Timmers AP, de Bock GH, Springer MP. Hoe up-to-date is het medisch dossier? Een onderzoek op vijf lokaties. Huisarts Wet 2001; 44: 194–7
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 253–63
   Google Scholar
• van Weel C, de Grauw W. Family practices registration networks contributed to primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 779–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers JG, Paget WJ, Schellevis FG, Fleming DM. European primary care surveillance networks: their structure and operation. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knottnerus JA. Registreren van morbiditeit in de huisartsgeneeskunde, over diversiteit van doelstellingen en vereisten. Huisarts Wet 1994; 37: 136–41
   Google Scholar
• Porcheret M, Hughes R, Evans D, Jordan K, Whitehurst T, Ogden H, et al. Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 78–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinus AMF. Inter-doktervariatie in het Transitieproject. Huisarts Wet 1990; 33: 4–8
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer HJ, van Weert HC, Vintges MMQ, Bindels PJE. De betekenis van interpraktijkvariatie in registratienetwerken. Huisarts Wet 2000; 43: 426–9
   Google Scholar
• Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ. 2003; 326: 1070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, van Dijk L, de Jong JD, de Bakker DH, Westert GP. Huisartsenzorg: Wat doet de poortwachter? Tweede Nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Nivel, Utrecht 2004
   Google Scholar
• Fleming DM, Bartelds A, Chapman RS, Cross KW. The consistency of shingles and its significance for health monitoring. Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 1113–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westert GP, Schellevis FG, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, van de Zee J. Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 59–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lindert H, Droomers M, Westert GP. Een kwestie van verschil: verschillen in zelf-gerapporteerde leefstijl, gezondheid en zorggebruik. Overzicht van bestaand onderzoek naar verschillen in Nederland. Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Utrecht: Nivel; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Biermans MCJ, de Bakker DH, Verheij RA, Gravestein JV, van der Linden MW, de Vries Robbé PF. Development of a case-based system for grouping diagnoses in general practice. Int J Med Inform 2007; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ziekten en aandoeningen. Gezondheidsproblemen. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationale Atlas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM, ( www.zorgatlas.nl) versie 3.13; 17 April, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rangorde naar sociale status van postcodegebieden in Nederland. 26 April, 2007 [ cited 2 June 2007]; Available from URL: www.scp.nl/onderzoek/statusscores/index.shtml.
   Google Scholar