355,146
Views
1,079
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodological Paper

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing

ORCID Icon &
Pages 120-124 | Received 18 Dec 2016, Accepted 09 Aug 2017, Published online: 05 Dec 2017

References

  • Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23:271–273.
  • Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23:274–279.
  • Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24. DOI:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage Publications; 1985.
  • Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:837–851.
  • Moser A, van der Bruggen H, Widdershoven G, et al. Self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative investigation from the perspective of participants in a nurse-led, shared-care programme in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:91.
  • Sim J, Sharp K. A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. Int J Nurs Stud. 1998;35:23–31.
  • Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data. Soc 2003;37:413–431.
  • O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–1251.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.