6,001
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Opinion Paper

SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 2: Exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice

, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 26-32 | Received 12 Apr 2019, Accepted 07 Oct 2019, Published online: 30 Oct 2019

References

  • Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e20.
  • Tan R , Cvetkovski B , Kritikos V , et al. Identifying an effective mobile health applications for the self-management of allergic rhinitis and asthma in Australia. J Asthma. 2019;24:1–12.
  • Pinnock H , Hanley J , McCloughan L , et al. Effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services on hospital admission for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;347:f6070.
  • Van der Kleij R , Kasteleyn MJ , Meijer E , et al. eHealth in primary care: hype or revolution? Eur J Gen Pract. 2019. DOI:10.1080/13814788.2019.1658190
  • Castle-Clarke S , Imison C. The Digital Patient: Transforming Primary Care? 2016 [accessed 2019 Oct]. Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2019-08/nt-the-digital-patient-web-update-august-2019.pdf
  • Sharon T. The Googlization of health research: from disruptive innovation to disruptive ethics. Per Med. 2016;13(6):563–574.
  • Shaw T , McGregor D , Brunner M , et al. What is eHealth? Development of a conceptual model for ehealth: qualitative study with key informants. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e324.
  • Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health. 2013;11(3):256–270.
  • Moerenhout T , Devisch I , Cornelis GC. E-health beyond technology: analyzing the paradigm shift that lies beneath. Med Health Care and Philos. 2018;21(1):31–41.
  • Topol EJ. The patient will see you now. The future of medicine is in your hands. New York (NY): Basic Books; 2015.
  • WONCA Europe . The European definition of general practice/family medicine. 2011 ed. [accessed 2019 Aug 19]. Available from: https://www.woncaeurope.org/sites/default/files/documents/Definition%203rd%20ed%202011%20with%20revised%20wonca%20tree.pdf
  • Lanzing M. “Strongly recommended” revisiting decisional privacy to judge hypernudging in self-tracking technologies. Philos Technol. 2019;32:549–568.
  • Chan S , Torous J , Hinton L , et al. Towards a framework for evaluating mobile mental health apps. Telemed e-Health. 2015;21(12):1038–1041.
  • Kleinpeter E. Four ethical issues of eHealth. IRBM. 2017;38(5):245–249.
  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Article 25: Data Protection by Design and by Default. 2016 [accessed 2019 Aug 19]. Available from: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-25-gdpr/
  • Sharon T. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol. 2017;30(1):93–121.
  • Sharon T. Let’s move beyond critique-but please let’s not depolitize the debate. Am J Bioeth. 2018;18(2):20–22.
  • Lucivero F , Jongsma KR. A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2018;44(10):685–689.
  • van der Burg S. Taking the “Soft Impacts” of technology into account: broadening the discourse in research practice. Soc Epistemol. 2009;23(3-4):301–316.
  • Verbeek PP. Accompanying technology: philosphy of technology after the ethical turn. Techné. 2010;14(1):49–54.
  • Siegel Sommers L , Launer J. Clinical uncertainty in primary care. The challenge of collaborative engagement. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013.
  • Mittelstadt BD , Allo P , Taddeo M , et al. The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 2016;3(2). DOI:10.1177/2053951716679679
  • Preliminary Study on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence . United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST); 2019 [accessed 2019 Aug 19]. SHS/COMEST/EXTWG-ETHICS-AI/2019/1.
  • McDougall RJ. Computer knows best? The need fo value-flexibility in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2019;45(3):156–169.
  • Roeser S. Risk, technology, and moral emotions. New York (NY): Routledge; 2018.
  • Thaler R , Sunstein C. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2008.
  • Bodie G , Dutta M. Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: eHealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Heal Mark Q. 2008;25(1-2):175–203.
  • Nyholm S. Attributing agency to automated systems: reflection on human-robot collaborations and responsibility loci. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:1201–1219.
  • Avitzour D , Barnea R , Avitzour E , et al. Nudging in the clinic: the ethical implications of differences in doctors’ and patients’ point of view. J Med Ethics. 2019; 45(3):183–189.
  • Kelley JM , Kraft-Todd G , Schapira L , et al. The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94207.
  • Jongsma KR , Bredenoord AL , Lucivero F. Digital medicine: an opportunity to revisit the role of bioethicists. Am J Bioeth. 2018;18(9):69–70.
  • Wu X , Guo X , Zhang Z. The efficacy of mobile phone apps for lifestyle modification in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;15(7):e12297.
  • Jeminiwa R , Hohmann L , Jingjing Q , et al. Impact of eHealth on medication adherence among patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Med. 2019;149:59–68.