SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 5: A critical appraisal of five widely used eHealth applications for primary care – opportunities and challenges

References

• van der Kleij R, Kasteleyn MJ, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 1: concepts, conditions and challenges. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(4):179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erler A, Bodenheimer T, Baker R, et al. Preparing primary care for the future – perspectives from The Netherlands, England, and USA. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(8):571–580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher RF, Croxson CH, Ashdown HF, et al. GP views on strategies to cope with increasing workload: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(655):e148–e156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan SS, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the Patient-Physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulesius H. Increased importance of digital medicine and eHealth during the covid-19 pandemic. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;38(2):105–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, et al. What is eHealth (6)? development of a conceptual model for eHealth: qualitative study with key informants. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers SN, Jongsma KR, Lucivero F, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 2: exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwink EJF, Kasteleyn MJ, Alpay L, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 3: eHealth education in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versluis A, Van Luenen S, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in Primary care. Part 4: addressing the challenges of implementation. Submitted to Eur J Gen Pract. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Villumsen S, Adler-Milstein J, Nøhr C. National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review. JAMIA Open. 2020;3(1):132–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danish Ministery of Health, Danish Minestery of Finance, Danish Regions, et al. A coherent and trustworthy health network for all – digital health strategy 2018-2022 Odense (Denmark); 2018. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/da/diverse/download.
   Google Scholar
• The Medical Futurist. National digital health strategies around the world: the medical futurist; 2018. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://medicalfuturist.com/national-digital-health-strategies-around-the-world/?utm_source=The%20Medical%20Futurist%20Newsletter&utm_campaign=39368b494f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_10_09_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_efd6a3cd08-39368b494f-420590025.
   Google Scholar
• HealthOne. HealthOne: share knowledge – better, safer care New Zealand. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://healthone.org.nz/.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters JM, Krijgsman JW, Brabers AE, et al. Use and uptake of eHealth in general practice: a cross-sectional survey and focus group study among health care users and general practitioners. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4(2):e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin A, Sattler A, Smith M. Retooling primary care in the COVID-19 era. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(9):1831–1834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Schoemaker FF. Communication of innovations: a cross-cultural approach. 2nd ed. New York: Free Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• de Wilt T, Versluis A, Goedhart A, et al. General practitioners attitude towards the use of eHealth and online testing in primary care. Clinical eHealth. 2020;3:16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters M, Huygens M, Voogdt H, et al. Let's work together – eHealth monitor 2019 [Samen aan zet – eHealth-monitor 2019] Den Haag and Utrecht: Nictiz and NIVEL; 2019. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://www.nictiz.nl/programmas/e-health-monitor/e-health-monitor-2019/.
   Google Scholar
• Odendaal WA, Anstey Watkins J, Leon N, et al. Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3:CD011942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, et al. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiners F, Sturm J, Bouw LJW, et al. Sociodemographic factors influencing the use of eHealth in people with chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson SA, Howard KB, Penney BK. Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008;108(12):699–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the Scale-Up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RE, Mars M. Principles and framework for eHealth strategy development. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcolino MS, Oliveira JAQ, D'Agostino M, et al. The impact of mHealth interventions: Systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(1):e23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal C, Stolee P, Juzwishin D, et al. Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olff M. Mobile mental health: a challenging research agenda. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015;6:27882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoelman WA, Bonten TN, de Waal MW, et al. Effect of an evidence-based website on healthcare usage: an interrupted time-series study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt CJ, Sogaard GI, Clemensen J, et al. Determinants of successful eHealth coaching for consumer lifestyle changes: qualitative interview study among health care professionals. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(7):e237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagatun S, Vedaa O, Harvey AG, et al. Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia and comorbid symptoms. Internet Interv. 2018;12:11–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haste A, Adamson AJ, McColl E, et al. Web-based weight loss intervention for men with type 2 diabetes: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2017;2(2):e14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komkova A, Brandt CJ, Hansen Pedersen D, et al. Electronic health lifestyle coaching among diabetes patients in a real-life municipality setting: observational study. JMIR Diabetes. 2019;4(1):e12140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Ingersoll KS, et al. Effect of a web-based cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia intervention with 1-year follow-up: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(1):68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman K, Dinnes J, Chuchu N, et al. Algorithm based smartphone apps to assess risk of skin cancer in adults: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Br Med J. 2020;368:m127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udrea A, Mitra GD, Costea D, et al. Accuracy of a smartphone application for triage of skin lesions based on machine learning algorithms. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(3):648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springvloed L, Bos N, de Jong J, et al. Thuisarts.nl – How does thuisarts.nl contribute to transparency and the best suitable care? [thuisarts.nl – Hoe draagt thuisarts.nl bij aan transparantie en de best passende zorg?]. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2019. [cited 2021 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/6-Transparantiemonitor-2018-Thuisartsnl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johansen MY, MacDonald CS, Hansen KB, et al. Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(7):637–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogeil RP, Chakraborty SP, Young AC, et al. Clinician and patient barriers to the recognition of insomnia in family practice: a narrative summary of reported literature analysed using the theoretical domains framework. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zweerde T, Lancee J, Ida Luik A, et al. Internet-Delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: tailoring cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia for patients with chronic insomnia. Sleep Med Clin. 2019;14(3):301–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer D. SHUTi: a new insomnia treatment via the internet. 2017. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/reading-between-the-headlines/201702/shuti-new-insomnia-treatment-the-internet.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen H, Batterham PJ, Gosling JA, et al. Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(4):333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariae R, Lyby MS, Ritterband LM, et al. Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;30:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandner MA, Chakravorty S. Insomnia in primary care: misreported, mishandled, and just plain missed. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(8):937–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglioni C, Altena E, Bjorvatn B, et al. The European academy for cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: an initiative of the European insomnia network to promote implementation and dissemination of treatment. J Sleep Res. 2020;29(2):e12967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser H, Coiera E, Wong D. Safety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2263–2264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd. Report of the inspection research of SkinVision in the period from January 2019 to December 2019 [Rapport van het inspectieonderzoek van SkinVision in de periode van januari 2019 tot december 2019] Utrecht: Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd; 2020. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://www.toezichtdocumenten.igj.nl/.
   Google Scholar