Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 6: Longitudinal qualitative and mixed-methods approaches for longitudinal and complex health themes in primary care research

References

• Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: introduction. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23(1):271–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: context, research questions and designs. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23(1):274–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 5: co-creative qualitative approaches for emerging themes in primary care research: experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research. Eur J Gen Pract. 2022;28(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R van der K, Kasteleyn M, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(4):179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. Ageing Europe. Looking at the lives of older people in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European; 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/ks-02-20-655.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane AE. Optimising individual and community involvement in health decision-making in general practice consultations and primary care settings: a way forward. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):196–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R, Daker-White G, Esmail A, et al. Threats to patient safety in primary care reported by older people with multimorbidity: baseline findings from a longitudinal qualitative study and implications for intervention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew-Graham CA, Hunter C, Langer S, et al. How QOF is shaping primary care review consultations: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Fam Pr. 2013;14:103.
   Google Scholar
• Lester H, Khan N, Jones P, et al. Service users' views of moving on from early intervention services for psychosis: a longitudinal qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(596):e183–e190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger M, Phillips EW, O'Rielly C, et al. Longitudinal qualitative study describing family physicians' experiences with attempting to integrate physical activity prescriptions in their practice: 'It's not easy to change habits'. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e017265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur N, Vedel I, El Sherif R, et al. Practical mixed methods strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in community-based primary health care research. Fam Pract. 2019;36(5):666–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Klassen A, Plano Clark V, et al. Research for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences, 2011 [Internet] [cited 2021 Sep 15]. Available from: https://obssr.od.nih.gov/research-resources/mixed-methods-research.
   Google Scholar
• Calman L, Brunton L, Molassiotis A. Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: lessons learned and recommendations for health services research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy M, Scott L, Salisbury C, et al. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(704):e166–e177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron A, Johnson EK, Lloyd L, et al. Using longitudinal qualitative research to explore extra care housing. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2019;14(1):647–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson R. The qualitative longitudinal case history: practical, methodological and ethical reflections. Social Policy Soc. 2007;6(4):571–582.
   Google Scholar
• Nevedal A, Ayalon L, Briller S. A qualitative evidence synthesis review of longitudinal qualitative research in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2019;59(6):e791–e801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd L, Calnan M, Cameron A, et al. Older people’s perspectives on dignity: the benefits and challenges of a qualitative longitudinal approach to researching experiences of later life. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(6):647–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer D, Richards B. Longitudinal qualitative research in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(5):306–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossoehme D, Lipstein E. Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: the application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimsmo A, Løhre A, Røsstad T, et al. Disease-specific clinical pathways - are they feasible in primary care? A mixed-methods study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36(2):152–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer M, van der Sande R, Maassen I, et al. Communication between Dutch community nurses and general practitioners lacks structure: an explorative mixed methods study . Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason B, Boyd K, Steyn J, et al. Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(670):e360–e369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonenboom J, Johnson R. How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Hirose M. Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health. Fam Med Community Health. 2019;7(2):e000086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. PCV-L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Vedel I, Kaur N, Hong Q, et al. Why and how to use mixed methods in primary health care research. Fam Pract. 2019;36(3):365–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Q, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version; 2018 [Internet] [cited 2021 Sep 15]. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson R, Holland J. Hindsight, foresight and insight: the challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2003;6(3):233–244.
   Google Scholar