The EGPRN Research Strategy for general practice in Europe

References

• Hummers-Pradier E, Beyer M, Chevallier P, et al. The research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary health care in Europe. Part 1. Background and methodology. Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(4):243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WONCA Europe. The European definition of general practice/family medicine WONCA Europe 2011 Edition. [cited 2022 May 17]. Available from: http://www.woncaeurope.org/sites/default/files/documents/Definition%203rd%20ed%202011%20with%20revised%20wonca%20tree.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collins C, ed. EGPRN Research Strategy for general practice in Europe 2021. European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN). [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2022 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.egprn.org/page/research-agenda.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley JW, Starfield B, van Weel C, et al. Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(6):518–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Weel C, Rosser WW. Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(suppl_2):S5–S16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mant D, Del Mar CB, Glasziou P, et al. The state of primary care research. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):1004–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Declaration of Astana. [cited 2022 May 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/primary-health/declaration/gcphc-declaration.pdf?sfvrsn=380474fa_22.
   Google Scholar
• Montori VM, Hargraves I, McNellis RJ, et al. The care and learn model: a practice and research model for improving healthcare quality and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(1):154–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kleij RMJJ, Kasteleyn MJ, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 1: concepts, conditions and challenges. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(4):179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. Constitution of the World Health Organization. 2006. [cited 2022 May 17]. Available from: www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, et al. How should we define health? BMJ. 2011;343:d4163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Council of the Netherlands. Publication A10/04. [cited 2022 May 17]. Available from: www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/bijlage%20A1004_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stange KC. The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(2):100–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallacher K, Jani B, Morrison D, et al. Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes – methodological challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn LR, Langlois EV, Bitton A, et al. What kind of evidence do we need to strengthen primary healthcare in the 21st century? BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(Suppl 8):e001668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stange KC, Miller WL, McWhinney I. Developing the knowledge base of family practice. Fam Med. 2001;33(4):286–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green LA. The research domain of family medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S23–S29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huas C, Petek D, Diaz E, et al. Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: the views of members of EGPRN and WONCA Europe. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(1):25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke J, Ariss S, Smith C, et al. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers JS, Wittenberg J, Keuken DG, et al. Development of a research agenda for general practice based on knowledge gaps identified in Dutch guidelines and input from 48 stakeholders. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(1):19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research and Development Directorate, Department of Health (UK). Best research for best health a new national health research strategy. London: Department of Health; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Vinker S, Ungan M. Research agenda in family medicine-should we adopt the Dutch approach? Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(1):5–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan F, Butler C, Cupples M, et al. Primary care research networks in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2007;334(7603):1093–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee J, Kroneman M, Bolíbar B. Conditions for research in general practice. Can the Dutch and British experiences be applied to other countries, for example Spain? Eur J Gen Pract. 2003;9(2):41–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TO-REACH transferring innovation in health systems. Advanced version of the strategic research agenda. May 2019; Ref. Ares(2019)7788239 - 18/12/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney E, McEvoy R, O'Reilly-de Brun M, et al. A critical analysis of the implementation of service user involvement in primary care research and health service development using normalization process theory. Health Expect. 2016;19(3):501–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Brun T, O'Reilly-de Brun M, Van Weel-Baumgarten E, et al. Using participatory learning & action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagley HJ, Short H, Harman NL, et al. A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials – a work in progress. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:15. [cited 2022 May 17]. Available from:.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prihodova L, Guerin S, Tunney C, et al. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: findings from a systematic scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(2):313–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis CC, Mettert KD, Dorsey CN, et al. An updated protocol for a systematic review of implementation-related measures. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar