Patient involvement in the encounter between general practice and patients with a chronic disease. Results of a scoping review focusing on type 2 diabetes and obstructive pulmonary disease

References

• Boote J, Wong R, Booth A. ‘Talking the talk or walking the walk?’ A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. Health Expect. 2015;18(1):44–57. Epub 2012/10/05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pii KH, Schou LH, Piil K, et al. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2019;22(1):3–20. Epub 2018/11/01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Patient and public involvement: a tool kit for GPs. London: British Medical Association; 2015. [cited 2022 November28]. Available from: https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1938/bma-patient-and-public-involvement-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy AP, Rogers AE. Improving patient involvement in chronic disease management: the views of patients, GPs and specialists on a guidebook for ulcerative colitis. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47(3):257–263. Epub 2002/06/29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(1):114–131. Epub 2014/10/30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, et al. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(6):566–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):Cd001431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RA, Pfeifer M, Shillington AC, et al. Effect of a patient decision aid (PDA) for type 2 diabetes on knowledge, decisional self-efficacy, and decisional conflict. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, et al. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(1):53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Grol R. Patients’ views on healthcare: a driving force for improvement in disease management. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2000;7(3):117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell C. Patient and public involvement in health: the evidence for policy implementation: a summary of the results of the health in partnership research programme. London: Department of Health; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hajat C, Stein E. The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: a narrative review. Prev Med Rep. 2018;12:284–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danske Regioner & PLO. Collective agreement between Danish Regions and General Practice; 2018. [Overenskomst om almen praksis]; [cited 2022 November 24]. Available from: https://www.laeger.dk/sites/default/files/overenskomst_om_almen_praksis_ok18_endelig_udgave.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen M, Titlestad SB, Lee K, et al. General practitioners’ perceptions of treatment of chronically ill patients managed in general practice: an interview study. Eur J Gen Pract. 2021;27(1):103–110. Epub 2021/06/04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermer T, van Weel C, Barten F, et al. Prevention and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care: position paper of the European Forum for Primary Care. Qual Prim Care. 2008;16(5):363–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill PJ, Roberts NW, Wang KY, et al. Development of a search filter for identifying studies completed in primary care. Fam Pract. 2014;31(6):739–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers M, Bethel A, Boddy K. Development and testing of a medline search filter for identifying patient and public involvement in health research. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(2):125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Joanne Briggs Inst. 2015:1–24. [cited 2022 November 28]. Available from: https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/jbi/docs/reviewersmanuals/scoping-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, et al. Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7(1):4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball L, Davmor R, Leveritt M, et al. Understanding the nutrition care needs of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a need for open communication and patient-focussed consultations. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(5):416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge LH, Foster MM, Donald M, et al. Making sense of change: patients’ views of diabetes and GP-led integrated diabetes care. Health Expect. 2016;19(1):74–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortus T, Kemp L, McKenzie S, et al. ‘Managing patient involvement’: provider perspectives on diabetes decision-making. Health Expect. 2013;16(2):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao J, Spooner C, Lo W, et al. Factors influencing self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice: a qualitative study. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25(2):176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchman ML, Zeber JE, Palmer RF. Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence, and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a STARNet study. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(5):410–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, et al. When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(11):893–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant RW, Altschuler A, Uratsu CS, et al. Primary care visit preparation and communication for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a qualitative study of patients and physicians. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(2):148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulhadi N, Al Shafaee M, Freudenthal S, et al. Patient-provider interaction from the perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients in Muscat, Oman: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdulhadi NM, Al-Shafaee MA, Wahlstrom R, et al. Doctors’ and nurses’ views on patient care for type 2 diabetes: an interview study in primary health care in Oman. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2013;14(3):258–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oftedal B, Karlsen B, Bru E. Perceived support from healthcare practitioners among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(7):1500–1509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laue J, Melbye H, Halvorsen PA, et al. How do general practitioners implement decision-making regarding COPD patients with exacerbations? An international focus group study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11(1):3109–3119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dambha-Miller H, Silarova B, Irving G, et al. Patients’ views on interactions with practitioners for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal qualitative study in primary care over 10 years. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(666):e36–e43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooley CG, Gerrard C, Hollis S, et al. ‘Oh it’s a wonderful practice… you can talk to them’: a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ views on the management of type 2 diabetes. Health Soc Care Community. 2001;9(5):318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell A, Stubbe M, Macdonald L, et al. A longitudinal study of interactions between health professionals and people with newly diagnosed diabetes. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(1):37–44. Epub 2018/01/10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliwell J, Mulcahy P, Buetow S, et al. GP discussion of prognosis with patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54(509):904–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wens J, Vermeire E, Royen PV, et al. GPs’ perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients’ adherence to treatment: a qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6(1):20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Coenen S, et al. The adherence of type 2 diabetes patients to their therapeutic regimens: a qualitative study from the patient’s perspective. Pract Diab Int. 2003;20(6):209–214.
   Google Scholar
• Syed A, Don ZM, Ng CJ, et al. Using a patient decision aid for insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative analysis of doctor-patient conversations in primary care consultations in Malaysia. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e014260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy BM, Rehman M, Johnson WD, et al. Healthcare providers versus patients’ understanding of health beliefs and values. Patient Exp J. 2017;4(3):29–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMillan SS, Kendall E, Sav A, et al. Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(6):567–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Hassan H, Tohid H, Mohd Amin R, et al. Factors influencing insulin acceptance among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a primary care clinic: a qualitative exploration. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose S, Paul C, Boyes A, et al. Stigma-related experiences in non-communicable respiratory diseases: a systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2017;14(3):199–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger BE, Kapella MC, Larson JL. The experience of stigma in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. West J Nurs Res. 2011;33(7):916–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BREATHE the Lung Association. Stigma report. www.lung.ca; 2018. [cited 2022 November 28]. Available from: https://nb.lung.ca/sites/default/files/StigmaReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bos-Touwen ID, Trappenburg JCA, van der Wulp I, et al. Patient factors that influence clinicians’ decision making in self-management support: a clinical vignette study. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heltberg A, Andersen JS, Kragstrup J, et al. Social disparities in diabetes care: a general population study in Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35(1):54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahnfeldt-Mollerup P, Søndergaard J, Barwell F, et al. The relationships between use of quality-of-care feedback reports on chronic diseases and medical engagement in general practice. Qual Manag Health Care. 2018;27(4):191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar