Impact of primary care physicians working part-time on patient care: A scoping review

References

• Hedden L, Barer ML, Cardiff K, et al. The implications of the feminization of the primary care physician workforce on service supply: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, et al. The new generation of family physicians - career motivation, life goals and work-life balance. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2008;138:305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisler LB, Bachofner M, Moser-Bucher CN, et al. From practice employee to (co-)owner: young GPs predict their future careers: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0591-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber T, Giezendanner S, Zeller A. Measuring workload of Swiss general practice: a five-yearly questionnaire-based survey on general practitioners’ self-reported working activities (2005–2020). Swiss Med Wkly. 2022;152(2526):w30196. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodes S, Hussain S, Panja A, et al. When part time means full time: the GP paradox. BMJ. 2022;377:o1271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Haq C, Lehmann W. Continuity and access in the era of Part-Time practice. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(4):359–360. doi: 10.1370/afm.2267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Walraven C, Oake N, Jennings A, et al. The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(5):947–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primary care. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/clinical-services-and-systems/primary-care.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaschek R, Lampart P, Scheel-Sailer A, et al. Improvement strategies for the challenging collaboration of general practitioners and specialists for patients with complex chronic conditions: a scoping review. Int J Integr Care. 2022;22(3):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cody R, Gysin S, Merlo C, et al. Complexity as a factor for task allocation among general practitioners and nurse practitioners: a narrative review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1089-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada. MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 5]. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosland A-M, Krein SL, Kim HM, et al. Measuring patient-centered medical home access and continuity in clinics with part-time clinicians. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21:e320-328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panattoni L, Stone A, Chung S, et al. Patients report better satisfaction with part-time primary care physicians, despite less continuity of care and access. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):327–333. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3104-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray A, Safran DG, Rogers WH, et al. Part-time physicians. Physician workload and patient-based assessments of primary care performance. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(4):327–332. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.4.327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairchild DG, McLoughlin KS, Gharib S, et al. Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(10):663–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01111.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkerton PH, Wagner EH, Smith DG, et al. Effect of part-time practice on patient outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):717–724. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20401.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolius D, Gunzler D, Hopkins M, et al. Panel size, clinician time in clinic, and access to appointments. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(6):546–548. doi: 10.1370/afm.2313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechaber HF, Levine RB, Manwell LB, et al. Part-time physicians…prevalent, connected, and satisfied. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):300–303. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0514-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, et al. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(2):122–128. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02219.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré-Plante A-A, Boivin A, Berbiche D, et al. Primary health care organizational characteristics associated with better accessibility: data from the QUALICO-PC survey in Quebec. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0871-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swami M, Gravelle H, Scott A, et al. Hours worked by general practitioners and waiting times for primary care. Health Econ. 2018;27(10):1513–1532. doi: 10.1002/hec.3782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heje HN, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, et al. Doctor and practice characteristics associated with differences in patient evaluations of general practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Hombergh P, Künzi B, Elwyn G, et al. High workload and job stress are associated with lower practice performance in general practice: an observational study in 239 general practices in The Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):118. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Vedsted P, Kersnik J, et al. Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(2):111–118. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a002597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer WLA, van den Berg MJ, Groenewegen PP. The association between the workload of general practitioners and patient experiences with care: results of a cross-sectional study in 33 countries. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00520-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROPEP Patientenbefragungen. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 3]. Available from: https://www.aqua-institut.de/projekte/europep-patientenbefragungen.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer WL, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, et al. QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12(1):115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. [cited 2023 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/.
   Google Scholar
• Gerd FM. Effects and experiences of part-time work in the health- and community-care services [Internet]. Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2019. [cited 2023 Jul 6]. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/publ/2019/Effects-and-experiences-of-part-time-work-in-the-health-and-community-care-services/.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar