Association of EFEMP1 with juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma in a patient with concomitant COL11A1-related Stickler syndrome

References

• Gupta V, Somarajan BI, Gupta S, Chaurasia AK, Kumar S, Dutta P, Sharma A, Tayo BO, Nischal K. The inheritance of juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Genet. 2017;92(2):134–42. doi:10.1111/cge.12906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Amero KK, Morales J, Aljasim LA, Edward DP. CYP1B1 mutations are a major contributor to juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(2):184–87. doi:10.3109/13816810.2013.841961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alward WL, Kwon YH, Khanna CL, Johnson AT, Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Narkiewicz J, Andorf JL, Moore PA, Fingert JH, et al. Variations in the myocilin gene in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(9):1189–97. eog20000. pii. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.9.1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Somarajan BI, Walia GK, Kaur J, Kumar S, Gupta S, Chaurasia AK, Gupta D, Kaushik A, Mehta A, et al. Role of CYP1B1, p.E229k and p.R368h mutations among 120 families with sporadic juvenile onset open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(2):355–62. doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3853-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Xie L, Wu Z, Cao Y, Zheng Y, Pang CP, Zhang M. Detection of mutations in MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1 in Chinese juvenile onset open-angle glaucoma using exome sequencing. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4498. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22337-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svidnicki PV, Braghini CA, Costa VP, Schimiti RB, de Vasconcellos JPC, de Melo MB. Occurrence of MYOC and CYP1B1 variants in juvenile open angle glaucoma Brazilian patients. Ophthalmic Genet. 2018;39(6):717–24. doi:10.1080/13816810.2018.1546405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collantes ERA, Delfin MS, Fan B, Torregosa JMR, Siguan-Bell C, Florcruz NVG, Martinez JMD, Masna-Hidalgo BJ, Guzman VPT, Anotado-Flores JF, et al. EFEMP1 rare variants cause familial juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mutat. 2021;43(2):240–52. doi:10.1002/humu.24320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay DS, Bennett TM, Shiels A, den Hollander AI. Exome sequencing identifies a missense variant in EFEMP1 co-segregating in a family with autosomal dominant primary open-angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132529. PONE-D-15-08694. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Tang C, Shi X. Analysis of variants in Chinese individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma using molecular inversion probe (MIP)-based panel sequencing. Mol Vis. 2020;26:378–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor S, Ong JS, An J, Han X, Zhou T, Siggs OM, Law MH, Souzeau E, Sharma S, Lynn DJ, et al. Genome-Wide association study of intraocular pressure uncovers new pathways to glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50(8):1067–71. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0176-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springelkamp H, Iglesias AI, Mishra A, Hohn R, Wojciechowski R, Khawaja AP, Nag A, Wang YX, Wang JJ, Cuellar-Partida G, et al. New insights into the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma based on meta-analyses of intraocular pressure and optic disc characteristics. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(2):438–53. ddw399. pii. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmorstein LY, Munier FL, Arsenijevic Y, Schorderet DF, McLaughlin PJ, Chung D, Traboulsi E, Marmorstein AD. Aberrant accumulation of EFEMP1 underlies drusen formation in Malattia Leventinese and age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(20):13067–72. doi:10.1073/pnas.202491599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickler GB, Hughes W, Houchin P. Clinical features of hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy (Stickler syndrome): a survey. Genet Med. 2001;3(3):192–96. doi:10.1097/00125817-200105000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Huang L, Xu Y, Xiao X, Li S, Jia X, Gao B, Wang P, Guo X, Zhang Q. Exome sequencing on 298 probands with early-onset high myopia: approximately one-fourth show potential pathogenic mutations in RetNet genes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(13):8365–72. 2480515. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotufo D, Ritch R, Szmyd L Jr., Burris JE. Juvenile glaucoma, race, and refraction. JAMA. 1989;261(2):249–52. doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03420020103038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggs JL, Del Bono EA, Schuman JS, Hutchinson BT, Walton DS. Clinical features of five pedigrees genetically linked to the juvenile glaucoma locus on chromosome 1q21-q31. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(12):1782–89. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30793-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annunen S, Korkko J, Czarny M, Warman ML, Brunner HG, Kaariainen H, Mulliken JB, Tranebjaerg L, Brooks DG, Cox GF, et al. Splicing mutations of 54-bp exons in the COL11A1 gene cause Marshall syndrome, but other mutations cause overlapping Marshall/Stickler phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65(4):974–83. S0002-9297(07)62600-7. doi:10.1086/302585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards AJ, Laidlaw M, Whittaker J, Treacy B, Rai H, Bearcroft P, Baguley DM, Poulson A, Ang A, Scott JD, et al. High efficiency of mutation detection in type 1 stickler syndrome using a two-stage approach: vitreoretinal assessment coupled with exon sequencing for screening COL2A1. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(7):696–704. doi:10.1002/humu.20347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snead MP, McNinch AM, Poulson AV, Bearcroft P, Silverman B, Gomersall P, Parfect V, Richards AJ. Stickler syndrome, ocular-only variants and a key diagnostic role for the ophthalmologist. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(11):1389–400. eye2011201 [pii]. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vithana EN, Khor CC, Qiao C, Nongpiur ME, George R, Chen LJ, Do T, Abu-Amero K, Huang CK, Low S, et al. Genome-Wide association analyses identify three new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44(10):1142–46. doi:10.1038/ng.2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar