References
- Amrine, Frederick, ed (1989). Literature and Science as Modes of Expression. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Atkinson, Dwight (1999). Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Phylosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. London: Routledge.
- Banville, John (1981). Kepler. New York: Vintage.
- Bastide, Françoise (2001). Una notte con Saturno. Meltemi: Scritti semiotici sul discorso scientifico. Rome.
- Battistini, Andrea (2000). Galileo e i Gesuiti. Vita e Pensiero: Miti letterari e retorica della scienza. Milan.
- Beer, Gillian (1983). Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. London: Routledge.
- Berkenkotter, Carol (2007). ‘Genre Evolution? The Case for a Historical Perspective.’ Advances in Discourse Studies. Eds Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew and Rodney H. Jones. London: Routledge. 178–91.
- Berkenkotter, Carol (2012). ‘Genre Change in the Digital Age: Questions about Dynamism, Affordances, Evolution.’ In Insights in Academic Genres. Eds Carol Berkenkotter, Vijay K. Bhatia and Maurizio Gotti. Bern: Peter Lang. 31–46.
- Block, Ed Jr. (1989). ‘T.H. Huxley’s Rhetoric and the Popularization of Victorian Scientific Ideas: 1854–1874.’ In Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Ed. Patrick Brantlinger. Bloomington: Indiana UP. 205–28.
- Brantlinger, Patrick, ed (1989). Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
- Bush, Douglas (1962). Science and English Poetry: A Historical Sketch 1590–1950. New YorkNY: Oxford UP.
- Cadbury, Deborah (2001). The Dinosaur Hunters: A Story of Scientific Rivalry and the Discovery of the Prehistoric World. [2000]. London: Fourth Estate.
- Calsamiglia, Helena (2003). ‘Popularization Discourse.’ Discourse Studies 5.2: 139–46.
- Campagna, Sandra et al. (2012). ‘Introduction.’ In Evolving Genres in Web-Mediated Communication. Eds Sandra Campagna et al. Bern: Peter Lang. 9–26.
- Campbell, J.A. (1997). ‘Charles Darwin: Rhetorician of Science.’ In Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies. Ed. Randy Allen Harris. London: Routledge. 3–17.
- Carlisle, Fred E. (1980). ‘Literature, Science, and Language: A Study of Similarity and Difference.’ Pre-Text 1.1–2: 39–72.
- Chapple, John Alfred Victor (1986). Science and Literature in the Nineteenth Century. London: Macmillan.
- Charney, Davida (2003). ‘Lone Geniuses in Popular Science. The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus.’ Written Communication 20.3: 215–41.
- Christie, John, and Shuttleworth, Sally, eds (1989). Nature Transfigured. Science and Literature 1700–1900. ManchesterNH: Manchester UP.
- Cosslett, Tess (1982). The ‘Scientific Movement’ and Victorian Literature. Brighton: Harvester Press.
- Darwin, Charles (1985). The Origin of Species. London: Penguin.
- Davie, Donald (1963). The Language of Science and the Language of Literature. 1700–1740. London: Sheed & Ward.
- Eastwood, W., ed (1961). A Book of Science Verse: The Poetic Relations of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.
- Evans, Ifor (1954). Literature and Science. London: Allen & Unwin.
- Fahnestock, Jeanne (1999). Rhetorical Figures in Science. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Frayn, Michael (1998). Copenhagen. A Play. New York: Random House.
- Freddi, Maria (2008). ‘Da The Origin of Species a The Descent of Man: Darwin e il “Primitivo”.’ In Il primitivismo e le sue metamorfosi. Archeologia di un discorso culturale. Ed. Gilberta Golinelli. Bologna: CLUEB. 413–28.
- Freddi, Maria (2011). ‘Analogical Reasoning in the Teaching of Science: The Case of Richard Feynman’s Physics.’ In The Promise of Reason: Studies in the New Rhetoric. Ed. John T. Gage. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 206–22.
- Gross, Alan G. (1990). The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
- Gross, Alan G. (2006). Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
- Gross, Alan G. (2011). ‘Solving the Mystery of Presence: Verbal/Visual Interaction in Darwin’s Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs.’ In The Promise of Reason: Studies in the New Rhetoric. Ed. John T. Gage. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 83–102.
- Halliday, M.A.K. (2002). ‘The Construction of Knowledge and Value in the Grammar of Scientific Discourse: With Reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species.’ In Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Vol. 2 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. London: Continuum. 168–92. [Originally published in de Stasio, Clotilde, Gotti, Maurizio and Bonadei, Rossana, eds (1990). La rappresentazione verbale e iconica: valori estetici e funzionali. Milan: Guerini Studio. 57–80.]
- Halliday, M.A.K. (2004a). The Language of Science. Vol. 5 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. London: Continuum.
- Halliday, M.A.K. (2004b) ‘Things and Relations: Regrammaticizing Experience as Technical Knowledge.’ In The Language of Science. Vol. 5 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. London: Continuum. 49–101. [Originally published in Martin, Jim R. and Veel, Robert, eds (1998). Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge. 185–235.]
- Halliday, M.A.K., and Martin, Jim R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer.
- Harris, Randy Allen, ed (1997). Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies. London: Routledge.
- Hawking, Stephen (1988). A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam.
- Heath-Stubbs, John, and Salman, Phillips, eds (1984). Poems of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Hellman, Hal (1998). Great Feuds in Science. Ten of the Liveliest Disputes Ever. New York: Wiley.
- Hüllen, Werner (1989). Their Manner of Discourse: Nachdenken über Sprache im Umkreis der Royal Society. Tübingen: Narr.
- Huxley, Leonard (2012). Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- Hyland, Ken, and Bondi, Marina, eds (2006). Academic Discourse Across Disciplines. Bern: Peter Lang.
- Ingersoll, Earl G. (1992). Representations of Science and Technology in British Literature Since 1880. New YorkNY: Peter Lang.
- Jones, Allan (2012). ‘Mary Adams and the Producer’s Role in Early BBC Science Broadcasts.’ Public Understanding of Science 21.8: 968–83.
- Jones, Richard Forster (1930). ‘Science and English Prose Style in the Third Quarter of the Seventeenth Century.’ Publications of the Modern Language Association 45.4: 997–1009.
- Jones, William Powell (1966). The Rhetoric of Science: A Study of Scientific Ideas and Imagery in Eighteenth-Century Poetry. Berkeley: U of California P.
- Korte, Barbara and Mair, Christian, eds (2010). ‘Linguistics and Cultural Studies.’ Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik. A Quarterly of Language, Literature and Culture, Special Issue 58.3: 195–201.
- Levine, George (1987). ‘One Culture: Science and Literature.’ In One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature. Ed. George Levine. MadisonWI: The U of Wisconsin P. 3–32.
- Levine, George (1988). Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
- Luzón, María José (2013). ‘Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.’ Written Communication 30.4: 428–57.
- Martin, Jim R., and Veel, Robert, eds (1998). Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge.
- Miller, Carolyn and Charney, Davida (2007). ‘Persuasion, Audience and Argument.’ In Handbook of Research on Writing. Ed. Charles Bazerman. London: Routledge. 583–98.
- Moirand, Sophie (2003). ‘Communicative and Cognitive Dimensions of Discourse on Science in the French Mass Media.’ Discourse Studies 5.2: 175–206.
- Montemayor-Borsinger, Ann (2012). ‘A Metafunctional Interpretation of Hybridity in Popular Science Genres.’ Paper presented at the 23rd European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop, ‘Permeable Contexts and Hybrid Discourses’, University Residential Centre of Bertinoro, 9–11 July.
- Myers, Greg (1985). ‘Nineteenth-Century Popularizations of Thermodynamics and the Rhetoric of Social Prophecy.’ Victorian Studies 29: 35–66. [Also in Brantlinger, Patrick, ed. (1989). Energy and Entropy. Science and Culture in Victorian Britain. Essays from Victorian Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP. 307–38.]
- Myers, Greg (1989). ‘Science for Women and Children: The Dialogue of Popular Science in the Nineteenth Century.’ In Nature Transfigured: Science and Literature, 1700–1900. Eds John Christie and Sally Shuttleworth. ManchesterNH: Manchester UP. 171–200.
- Myers, Greg (1990). Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. MadisonWI: U of Wisconsin P.
- Myers, Greg (2003). ‘Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.’ Discourse Studies 5.2: 265–79.
- Nate, Richard (2001). Wissenschaft und Literatur im England der frühen Neuzeit. Munich: Fink.
- Nicolson, Majorie Hope (1946). Newton Demands the Muse: Newton’s ‘Opticks’ and the Eighteenth-Century Poet. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
- Nicolson, Marjorie Hope (1960). The Breaking of the Circle: Studies in the Effect of the ‘New Sciences’ on Seventeenth Century Poetry. New YorkNY: Columbia UP.
- O’Halloran, Kay L. (2005). Mathematical Discourse. Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.
- Otis, Laura, ed (2009). Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century. An Anthology. [2002]. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie (1958). Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. [Eng. translation by Wilkinson, John and Weaver, Purcell (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P.]
- Prelli, Lawrence J. (1989). A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. ColumbiaSC: U of South Carolina P.
- Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth (2012). ‘Open Science and the Re-purposing of Genre: An Analysis of Web-Mediated Laboratory Protocols.’ In Evolving Genres in Web-Mediated Communication. Eds Sandra Campagna et al. Bern: Peter Lang. 127–50.
- Schatzberg, Walter, Waite, Ronald A., and Johnson, Jonathan K. (eds.) (1987). The Relations of Literature and Science: An Annotated Bibliography of Scholarship, 1880–1980. New YorkNY: Modern Language Association.
- Schmied, Josef. (2011). ‘Academic Writing in Europe: A Survey of Approaches and Problems.’ In Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives. Ed. Josef Schmied. Goettingen: Cuvillier. 1–22.
- Shaffer, Elinor S., ed. (1998) The Third Culture: Literature and Science. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Shinn, Terry, and Whitley, Richard, eds (1985). Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Sinclair, John, et al. (2004). English Collocational Studies: The OSTI Report. London: Continuum.
- Sobel, Dava (1995). Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Great Scientific Problem of His Time. London: Fourth Estate.
- Spradley, James P. (1980). Participant Observation. New YorkNY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Sprat, Thomas (1667). The History of the Royal-Society of London, For the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London: J. Martyn.
- Stark, Ryan J. (2009). Rhetoric, Science, and Magic in Seventeenth-Century England. Washington, DC: Catholic U of America P.
- Swales, John (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- Vickers, Brian, and Struever, Nancy (1985). Rhetoric and the Pursuit of Truth: Language Change in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Los AngelesCA: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.
- Winterson, Jeanette (1997). Gut Symmetries. London: Granta.