Global coherence in younger and older adults: Influence of cognitive processes and discourse type

REFERENCES

• Agar, M., & Hobbs, J. R. 1982. Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interview. Discourse Processes, 5, l–32.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, T., & Gold, D. (1993). Aging, inhibition, and verbosity. Journal of Gerontology, 48, 225–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ash, S., Moore, P., Antani, S., McCawley, G., Work, M., & Grossman, M. (2006). Trying to tell a tale: Discourse impairments in progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 66, 1405–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, R. L., Borod, J. C., Santschi-Haywood, C., Pick, L. H., & Obler, L. K. (1996). Left and right hemispheric contributions to discourse coherence and cohesion. International Journal of Neuroscience, 88, 125–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Bush, H. (May–June, 2011). The influence of memory and attention abilities on picture description performance. Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2005). CIU and main event analyses of the structured discourse of older and younger adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38, 431–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, J. A. (1995). Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics. Brain and Language, 51, 291–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C., & Flewellyn, L. (2003). Longitudinal assessment of coherence in an adult with fluent aphasia: A follow-up study. Aphasiology, 17, 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scale and disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H., & Silverman, S. (1978). Hearing and deafness. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A. (1985). Good dog Carl. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M. S., Allen. R. S., & Burgio, L. D. (2004). Conversational coherence: Discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). Building coherence: A framework for exploring the breakdown of links across clause boundaries in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 254–269. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Duchan, J. (1994). Approaches to the study of discourse in the social sciences. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, & S. D. DeSanti et al. (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Elvevåg, B., Foltz, P. W., Weinberger, D., & Goldberg, T. E. (2007). Quantifying incoherence in speech: An automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 304–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing-Cobbs, L., Brookshire, B., Scott, M. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1998). Children’s narratives following traumatic brain injury: Linguistic structure, cohesion, and thematic recall. Brain and Language, 61, 395–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (September, 2011). Global discourse coherence in normal and aphasic discourse. Paper presented at New Trends in Experimental Psycholinguistics, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein, M., & Folstein, S. (2002). Mini-mental state examination (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1990). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1992). A comparison of changes in macrolinguistic and microlinguistic aspects of discourse production in normal aging, Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 266–272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golden, C. (2002). Stroop color and word test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & & Barresi, B. (2001). The Boston diagnostic aphasia examination; the assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1986). Taking a cross-cultural look at narratives. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, M. S., & Barrow, I. (2003). Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 17, 183–191. doi:10.1080/729255221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., McGillivray, L., & Schmidek, M. (1997). Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. E., Burke, D. M., Austin, A., & Hume, E. (1998). Production and perception of “verbosity” in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13, 355–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western aphasia battery—revised. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A., Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. (2009). Discourse coherence in healthy younger & older adults. New Orleans, LA: ASHA Convention.
   Google Scholar
• Krahn, F. (1978). The great ape. New York, NY: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Luakso, M., Vuorinen, E., & Rime, J. (1998). Coherence and informativeness of discourse in two dementia types. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longacre, R. E. (1996). The grammar of discourse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., Brady, M., Norrie, J., & Poedjianto, N. (2007). Picture description in neurologically normal adults: Concepts and topic coherence. Aphasiology, 21, 340–354. doi:10.1080/02687030600911419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Andreetta, S., del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25, 1372–1392.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Boewe, A., Caltagirone, C., & Carlomagno, S. (2005). Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 439–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. S. (2006). Struggling to make sense: Patterns of impairment in adult narrative discourse. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 25, 321–336.
   Google Scholar
• McCully, E. A. (1984). Picnic. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• McDowd, J. M., & Shaw, R. J. (2000). Attention and aging: A functional perspective. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 221–292), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L., & Brookshire, R. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olness, G. S. (2006). Genre, verb, and coherence in picture-elicited discourse of adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 175–187. doi:10.1080/02687030500472710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R. (2002). Comprehensive trail making test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Rogalski, Y., Altmann, L. P., Plummer-D’Amato, P., Behrman, A. L., & Mariske, M. (2010). Discourse coherence and cognition after stroke: A dual task study. Journal of Comunication Disorders, 43, 212–224. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh J. I., & Yesavage J. A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontology: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention. New York, NY : The Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. L. (1985). The causal basis for deciding importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131–154). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leer, E., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion on adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 327–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pyschological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2009). Manipulating task instructions to change narrative discourse performance. Aphasiology, 23, 1295–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2012). Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 656–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Capilouto, G. J., Srinivasan, C., & Fergadiotis, G. (2011). Story processing ability in cognitively healthy younger and older adults. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 54, 900–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Capilouto, G. J., & Wagovich, S. A., Cranfill, T. B., & Davis, J. E. (2005). Development and reliability of a quantitative measure of adults’ narratives. Aphasiology, 19, 263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Koutsoftas, A., Fergadiotis, G., & Capilouto, G. J. (2010). Coherence in stories told by adults with aphasia. Athens: Academy of Aphasia.
   Google Scholar