897
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forensic Applications

Cognition and Competency Restoration: Using the RBANS to Predict Length of Stay for Patients Deemed Incompetent to Stand Trial

, , &
Pages 150-165 | Received 13 Jul 2014, Accepted 05 Jan 2015, Published online: 04 Feb 2015

References

  • Advokat, C. D., Guidry, D., Burnett, D. M. R., Manguno-Mire, G., & Thompson, J. W., Jr. (2012). Competency restoration treatment: differences between defendants declared competent or incompetent to stand trial. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40, 89–97.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Bailie, J. M., King, L. C., Kinney, D., & Nitch, S. R. (2012). The relationship between self-reported neuropsychological risk factors and RBANS test performance among forensically committed psychiatric inpatients. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–8.
  • Bertman, L. J. (2003). Effect of an individualized treatment protocol on restoration of competency in pretrial forensic inpatients. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 27–35.
  • Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 729–741.
  • Carbonell, J. L., Heilbrun, K., & Friedman, F. L. (1992). Predicting who will regain trial competency: Initial promise unfulfilled. Forensic Reports, 5, 67–76.
  • Cochrane, R., Grisso, T., & Frederick, R. I. (2001). The relationship between criminal charges, diagnoses, and psycholegal opinions among federal defendants. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 565–582.
  • Colwell, L. H., & Gianesini, J. (2011). Demographic, criminogenic, and psychiatric factors that predict competency restoration. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 297–306.
  • Cooke, G. (1969). The court study unit: Patient characteristics and differences between patients judged competent and incompetent. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 140–143.
  • Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2003). Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 423–436.
  • Daniel, A. E., Beck, N. C., Herath, A., Schmitz, M., & Menninger, K. (1984). Factors correlated with psychiatric recommendations of incompetency and insanity. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 12, 527–544.
  • Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Philpott, L. M., & Hess, R. A. (2009). Dementia and effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 133–152.
  • Denney, R. L., & Tyner, E. A. (2010). Criminal law, competency, insanity, and dangerousness: Competency to proceed. In A. M. Horton Jr. & L. C. Hartlage (Eds.), The handbook of forensic neuropsychology second edition (pp. 211–233). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Dickerson, F., Boronow, J. J., Stallings, C., Origoni, A. E., Cole, S. K., & Yolken, R. H. (2004). Cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Comparison of performance on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Psychiatry Research, 129, 45–53.
  • Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S. Ct. 788, 4 L. Ed. 2d 824 (1960).
  • Frierson, R. L., & Finkenbine, R. D. (2004). Psychiatric and neurological characteristics of murder defendants referred for pretrial evaluation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49, 604–609.
  • Frierson, R. L., Shea, S. J., & Shea, M. E. C. (2002). Competence-to-stand-trial evaluations of geriatric defendants. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 252–256.
  • Gold, J. M., Queern, C., Iannone, V. N., & Buchanan, R. W. (1999). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, I: Sensitivity, reliability, and validity. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1944–1950.
  • Gorissen, M., Sanz, J. C., & Schmand, B. (2005). Effort and cognition in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Research, 78, 199–208.
  • Grisso, T. (with Borum, R., Edens, J. F., Moye, J., & Otto, R. K.). (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1992). Predicting fitness to stand trial: The relative power of demographic, criminal, and clinical variables. Forensic Reports, 5, 53–65.
  • Heilbronner, R. L. (2004). A status report on the practice of forensic neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 18, 312–326.
  • Heller, M. S., Traylor, W. H., Ehrlich, S. M., & Lester, D. (1981). Intelligence, psychosis, and competency to stand trial. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 9, 267–274.
  • Hobart, M. P., Goldberg, R., Bartko, J. J., & Gold, J. M. (1999). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: Convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1951–1957.
  • Hubbard, K. L., & Zapf, P. A. (2003). The role of demographic, criminal, and psychiatric variables in examiners’ predictions of restorability to competency to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 145–155.
  • Hubbard, K. L., Zapf, P. A., & Ronan, K. A. (2003). Competency restoration: An examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 127–139.
  • In re Davis, 8 Cal. 3d 798 (1973).
  • Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., & Haley, G. M. T. (2009). Interpretation of the RBANS in inpatient psychiatry: Clinical normative data and prevalence of low scores for patients with schizophrenia. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 31–41.
  • Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 92 S. Ct. 1845, 32 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1972).
  • Johnson, W. G., Nicholson, R. A., & Service, N. M (1990). The relationship of competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 169–185.
  • King, L. C., Bailie, J. M., Kinney, D. I., & Nitch, S. R. (2012). Is the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status factor structure appropriate for inpatient psychiatry? An exploratory and higher-order analysis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 756–765.
  • Kirkish, P., & Sreenivasan, S. (1999). Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: A practical conceptual model. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 101–113.
  • Lamb, H. R. (1987). Incompetency to stand trial: Appropriateness and outcome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 754–758.
  • Marcopulos, B. A., Morgan, J. E., & Denney, R. L. (2008). Neuropsychological evaluation of competency to proceed. In R. L. Denney & J. P. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting (pp. 176–203). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Martell, D. A. (1992). Forensic neuropsychology and the criminal law. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 313–336.
  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Miller, R. D. (2003). Hospitalization of criminal defendants for evaluation of competence to stand trial or for restoration of competence: Clinical and legal issues. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 369–391.
  • Moore, R. C., Davine, T., Harmell, A. L., Cardenas, V., Palmer, B. W., & Mausbach, B. T. (2013). Using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index to predict treatment group attendance in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 198–205.
  • Morris, D. R., & DeYoung, N. J. (2012). Psycholegal abilities and restoration of competence to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 710–728.
  • Morris, D. R., & Parker, G. F. (2008). Jackson’s Indiana: State hospital competence restoration in Indiana. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 522–534.
  • Morris, D. R., & Parker, G. F. (2009). Effects of advanced age and dementia on restoration of competence to stand trial. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 156–160.
  • Mossman, D. (2007). Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35, 34–43.
  • Nestor, P. G., Daggett, D., Haycock, J., & Price, M. (1999). Competence to stand trial: A neuropsychological inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 397–412.
  • Nicholson, R. A., Barnard, G. W., Robbins, L., & Hankins, G. (1994). Predicting treatment outcome for incompetent defendants. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22, 367–377.
  • Nicholson, R. A., & Kugler, K. E. (1991). Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: A quantitative review of comparative research. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 355–370.
  • Nicholson, R. A., & McNulty, J. L. (1992). Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 371–383.
  • Noffsinger, S. G. (2001). Restoration to competency practice guidelines. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 3546–3562.
  • Parker, G. F. (2012). The quandary of unrestorability. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40, 171–176.
  • Pinals, D. A. (2005). Where two roads meet: Restoration of competence to stand trial from a clinical perspective. New England Journal of Criminal Civil Confinement, 31, 81–108.
  • Pirelli, G., Gottdiener, W. H., & Zapf, P. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of competency to stand trial research. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17 (1), 1–53.
  • Pirelli, G., Zapf, P. A., & Gottdiener, W. H. (2011). Competency to stand trial research: Guidelines and future directions. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22, 340–370.
  • Randolph, C. (1998). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Rodenhauser, R., & Khamis, H. J. (1988). Relationship between legal and clinical factors among forensic hospital patients. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 321–332.
  • Samuel, S. E., & Michals, T. J. (2011). Competency restoraion. In E. Y. Drogin, F. M. Dattilio, R. L. Sadoff, & T. G. Gutheil (Eds.), Handbook of forensic assessment: Psychological and psychiatric perspectives (pp. 79–96). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
  • Schwalbe, E., & Medalia, A. (2007). Cognitive dysfunction and competency restoration: Using cognitive remediation to help restore the unrestorable. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35, 518–525.
  • Siegel, A. M., & Elwork, A. (1990). Treating incompetence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 57–65.
  • Silverberg, N. D., Wertheimer, J. C., & Fichtenberg, N. L. (2007). An Effort Index for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 841–854.
  • Simpler, A. H., & Parmenter, B. A. (2011). Can neuropsychological assessment inform forensic evaluators’ psycholegal opinions? Evidence through a case report. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11, 351–360.
  • Warren, J. I., Fitch, W. L., Dietz, P. E., & Rosenfeld, B. D. (1991). Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: An analysis of 894 pretrial referrals. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19, 63–69.
  • Warren, J. I., Murrie, D. C., Stejskal, W., Colwell, L. H., Morris, J., Chauhan, P., … Dietz, P. (2006). Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: A review of 8,000 evaluations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 113–132.
  • White, A. J., Batchelor, J., Pulman, S., & Howard, D. (2012). The role of cognitive assessment in determining fitness to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 102–109.
  • Wilk, C. M., Gold, J. M., Bartko, J. J., Dickerson, F., Fenton, W. S., Knable, M., … Buchanan, R. W. (2002). Test–retest stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 838–844.
  • Wilk, C. M., Gold, J. M., Humber, K., Dickerson, F., Fenton, W. S., & Buchanan, R. W. (2004). Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: Normative data for the Repeatable Battery for the Assesment of Neuropsychological Status. Schizophrenia Research, 70, 175–186.
  • Zapf, P. A., Hubbard, K. L., Cooper, V. G., Wheeles, M. C., & Ronan, K. A. (2004). Have the courts abdicated their responsibility for determination of competency to stand trial to clinicians? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 27–44.
  • Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2011). Future directions in the restoration of competency to stand trial. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 43–47.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.